Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐫𝐝 ✨

Channel

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐫𝐝 ✨

@TheWizardNft

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,335subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002813414008
TypeChannel
Username@TheWizardNft
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheWizardNft

Growth

1,3351,4211,3788 August 2026 — 1,421 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,411 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,408 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,401 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,392 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,383 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,371 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,375 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,352 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,335 subscribers8 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,322–1,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 16:171,335-17
2 Sept 2026, 12:371,352-16
30 Aug 2026, 08:561,368-7
27 Aug 2026, 08:241,375+4
24 Aug 2026, 06:381,371-12
21 Aug 2026, 00:261,383-9
17 Aug 2026, 18:241,392-9
14 Aug 2026, 18:481,401-7
11 Aug 2026, 15:521,408-3
8 Aug 2026, 23:511,411-10
8 Aug 2026, 00:031,421first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53146234515399972061734.7%
1734.7%
🍾918.4%
🔥612.2%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheWizardNft. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC9 viewsread 8 August 2026

Вже скоро мають видати гроші за цього бота, тому поспішіть ‼️

5 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC82 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Серед перших 5 хто пройде перевірку розіграю 🧸

4 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026

Першому хто пройде перевірку в боті кину 🧸

3 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC106 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лутаєм халявні гроші 💵 Я натрапив на бота який реально виплачує гроші. Вам дають можливість халявно покрутити рулетку де може випасти сума в районі 10 - 100 грн 🔥 Також можна отримати ще прокрути за запрошених друзів ☄️ Ось посилання: https://t.me/zaproshui_vygravai_bot?start=ref_5106381585

1

2 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC147 viewsread 8 August 2026

Реферальний розіграш з сочними призами

25 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC259 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Забираємо прості 200 грн + 100 - 300 грн за друга ‼️ Єдина умова це вік від 14 років та мати Дію 🗣️ Скачуємо Alliance Bank Відкриваємо картку "Стартова"' Проходимо легку реєстрацію Одразу забираємо 200 грн та 100 - 300 грн за кожного друга 💵 Alliance Bank

1

25 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC224 viewsread 8 August 2026

Раджу зайти в цю тему пораніше, тому не зволікаємо Заходимо ‼️ Всеодно це абсолютно безкоштовно 🔥

25 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC218 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новий бот по типу нот - коіна, залітаєм поки не пізно ‼️ Недавно вийшов новий бот SixSeven. Капіталізація токену проєкту вже близько 20 млн $, тому на скам не схоже 🔥 Що потрібно робити❓ Вам потрібно виконувати завдання, запрошувати друзів та фармити 67 поінти. Все дуже просто та багато часу не забирає 🔝 Я вже залетів в цю тєму і вам раджу не затягувати. Бо якщо монету і справді випустять то можна буде непогано за

2custom 53146234515399972062🍾1

24 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC198 viewsread 8 August 2026

Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. Ярослав (6909224708)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheWizardNft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐫𝐝 ✨” (@TheWizardNft), 1,335 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheWizardNft.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.