Channel
@The_Big_BangTheory
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
239subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002198869432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Big_BangTheory |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Big_BangTheory |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 239 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:23 | 236 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 236 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5353025608832004653 | 44 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5323547156630483403 | 28 | 20.4% | |
| custom 5197564405650307134 | 26 | 19.0% | |
| custom 5217824874487101321 | 11 | 8.03% | |
| custom 5339267587337370029 | 11 | 8.03% | |
| custom 5323772371830588991 | 9 | 6.57% | |
| custom 5197706972794731241 | 8 | 5.84% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2025 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Немного глупых фактов: Cуществует миф, что лист бумаги нельзя сложить больше 8 раз. На самом деле, если у вас будет достаточно большой лист можно сложить его сколько угодно. Однако есть одна проблема: если сложить лист 103 раза получится стопка толщиной больше известной Вселенной — 93 миллиарда световых лет.
custom 53530256088320046532custom 51975644056503071341custom 51977069727947312411
⭕️Долины Маринер ➡️Гигантская система каньонов на Марсе. Обнаружена в 1971–1972 годах космическим аппаратом «Маринер-9». В 1973 году по предложению Уильяма Пикеринга названа в честь программы «Маринер» ➡️Расположены вдоль экватора Марса, на восточной стороне выпуклости Тарсис, простираются почти на четверть окружности планеты. ✅Характеристики Длина — 4500 км (четверть окружности планеты). Ширина — до 600 км (в сре…
custom 51975644056503071343custom 53235471566304834031custom 53392675873373700291
🚀Очередной пост о размерах. Некоторые спутники газовых гигантов, не так сильно отличаются по размерам от планет.
custom 53235471566304834033custom 53392675873373700292custom 51975644056503071341
Антарктида скоро исчезнет? 😱
custom 51975644056503071344custom 52178248744871013212custom 53235471566304834032custom 53392675873373700291
Почему космонавты носят сапоги? 🧑🏻🚀
custom 51975644056503071345custom 53235471566304834032custom 53392675873373700292
Зачем космонавтам игрушки в космосе? 🛰
custom 52178248744871013215custom 51975644056503071342custom 53235471566304834032
⭕️Орбитальная станция "Мир" на первом этапе сборки и за несколько лет перед затоплением. ⭕️Станция проработала в три раза дольше первоначально установленного срока эксплуатации.
custom 51975644056503071343custom 52178248744871013211custom 53235471566304834031custom 53392675873373700291
⭕️Лицо на Марсе - выветренный холм, который на первых снимках в 1976 году с аппарата Viking-1, выглядел, как огромное человекоподобное лицо, что вызвало множество фантастических и псевдонаучных теорий. ⭕️Позднее в 2001 году, снимки со станции MGS показали, что ничего необычного в этой горе нет, а раннее сделанный снимок это лишь игра света, теней и привычка человеческого мозга искать во всех предметах знакомые очерт…
custom 51975644056503071344custom 53235471566304834032custom 53392675873373700291
Так, каждое столетие вращение Земли замедляется на 0.002 секунды, в результате чего продолжительность суток на планете увеличивается на ~15 микросекунд в год, а Луна ежегодно удаляется от нас на 3.8см
custom 53530256088320046536custom 51977069727947312412custom 53235471566304834032custom 53237723718305889912
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53530256088320046538custom 53235471566304834033custom 53392675873373700292
⚡️Зодиакальный свет. Объектив смотрит на запад, через несколько минут после заката Солнца. Зодиакальный свет - это солнечный свет, отраженный частицами пыли, рассеянными между Солнцем и Землей.
custom 52178248744871013213custom 53530256088320046533custom 53235471566304834032
Так землю почти никогда не показывают, а тем временем это наша планета со стороны тихого океана.
custom 53530256088320046535custom 53235471566304834032custom 53392675873373700291
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @The_Big_BangTheory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🪐The Big Bang Theory🌏” (@The_Big_BangTheory), 239 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Big_BangTheory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.