1325 #藍田 啟田道 啟田商場 譚仔外 1衝停泊 至少4軍裝落地並截查市民 AM9717 KT 6

Channel
The Watcher 狩望者哨兵頻道
@The_watcher_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,776subscribers
-257 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001402425048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_watcher_channel |
| Description | The Watcher狩望者哨兵公會哨頻 本哨台致力以最專業態度 快速準確為手足 提供日常及各類型活動期間資訊 歡迎提供各類型資訊 車牌車類型車種區牌無任歡迎 越準確越充足資料 絕對可以加強我地每次於活動期間作出分析 p.s. 本哨台近日已新增 地圖功能 加上文字分析整合 希望能夠更加方便用家 本頻道設有教學頻道如想閱讀詳細步驟教學請前往 @Sentinel_Training 報料請用 @watchoutzentrie_bot |
| Created | 25 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_watcher_channel |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:36 | 7,776 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:47 | 7,788 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 7,794 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 7,802 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 7,811 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:19 | 7,823 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:14 | 7,835 | -7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 7,842 | -8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 7,850 | -13 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 7,863 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 7,877 | -18 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 7,895 | -42 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 7,937 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 7,939 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 7,950 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:15 | 7,967 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 7,983 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 7,989 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 7,997 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 8,005 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.17%
- avg views ÷ 7,776 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 480
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (28 July 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 6,714 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,240
- Videos
- ≈37
- Links
- ≈721
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
1122 #上環 德輔道中 禧利街 永安 1巡閃燈停泊 AM7661 C 3/4
1107 #上環 黨鐵站 ABCD出口 大堂 2軍裝1便衣戒備
1051 #上環 德輔道中 禧利街 永安 1衝閃燈停泊 AM8466 C 4
0946 #佐敦 白加士街 至尊養生 1豬停泊 另 彌敦道 近寧波街 1衝停泊 3軍裝落地進入金漢大廈 AM6581 EUKW 23
較早前 1840 #愉景灣 愉景灣道 愉景灣商場巴士站 1衝停泊 區屬 LT 2/4
1300 #藍田 安田街 平田邨 平真樓 1鬼私停泊
2355 #藍田 啟田道 啟田商場 1衝往 德田/平田 方向行駛
2348 #藍田 黨鐵站 AD出口3軍裝1便衣截查市民
2154 #藍田 黨鐵站 AD出口閘內 3黃有cam捉出入閘 另 3軍裝1便衣進入控制室
0948 #東涌 黨鐵站 B出口 3軍裝截查途人
2217 #藍田 鯉魚門道 匯景巴士總站 1衝停泊 4軍裝1便衣往匯景商場及黨鐵C出口方向巡邏
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @The_watcher_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@testing_channel_001 · 113 posts612兩周年 旺角見
@daybreakoperation · 2437 posts獴能救港哨兵Channel
@munglunsavehk · 3,4174 posts香港獨立革命
@hkwarofindependence · 9073 posts石籬石蔭安蔭梨木樹即時資訊
@ShekLeiShekYamOnYamRealtimeinfo · 6012 posts齊上齊落Channel
@togetherwestandhk · 182 posts皇天擊殺五毛-哨兵
@Deathto50cents_scout · 701 post港島特訓 HKITC
@HKisland_training · 4961 post📡 民防事務管理局
@HongKongStateCDMA · 701 post張可森 Sam Cheung Ho Sum
@samcheunghs · 1761 post南區文宣渠道 請廣傳🔊
@southernmansuenchannel · 4751 post學生革命陣線
@student_revolution · 401 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@youarenotalonehk · 48,011
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@HK_Traffic_News · 43,652
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
@HK_Schedule · 23,156
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,578
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@hktgb · 37,743
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@youarenotalonehk_live · 31,547
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@weatherjj · 42,174
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Watcher 狩望者哨兵頻道” (@The_watcher_channel), 7,776 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_watcher_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.