Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Archive

Channel

The Archive

@Thearchiveiq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

686subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221728157
TypeChannel
Username@Thearchiveiq
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Thearchiveiq

Growth

68669869210 August 2026 — 698 subscribers11 August 2026 — 698 subscribers17 August 2026 — 697 subscribers24 August 2026 — 692 subscribers31 August 2026 — 690 subscribers8 September 2026 — 686 subscribers10 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 684–700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:37686-4
31 Aug 2026, 00:28690-2
24 Aug 2026, 19:52692-5
17 Aug 2026, 17:08697-1
11 Aug 2026, 03:55698no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:31698first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3056.6%
🔥713.2%
👏59.43%
❤‍🔥47.55%
🏆23.77%
11.89%
🎉11.89%
🕊11.89%
😍11.89%
🤩11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC115 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

البحث الخاص بالموضوع عمل سما غسان The Archive Property

8❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC130 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Techno feudalism.. A big word... but it made me stop and think..! We often say technology gives us freedom, but what if we're paying for that freedom with something we barely notice our time,our attention and our data? Don't get me wrong, Technology has changed our lives for the better in so many ways But maybe it's worth asking ourselves once in a while Are we really using technology or is it slowly using us?

8

31 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC222 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

التكنولوجيا إقطاع هارب من العصور الوسطى أم مجرد سبيل للهروب من الواقع المؤلم؟

51❤‍🔥1👏1🔥1

10 May 2026, 17:04 UTC360 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

البحث الخاص بالموضوع عمل مريم حيدر The Archive Property

3❤‍🔥1🎉1🔥1🕊1

10 May 2026, 17:02 UTC343 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Imagine standing in one exact spot and being able to step into three different countries within seconds sounds like something out of a movie right?!! But this place actually exists in Europe! where the borders of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany meet! Yet the real story goes way beyond geography. This area once included a strange little territory that wasn’t fully owned by one country mainly because of valuabl

🔥2🏆1👏1

10 May 2026, 17:01 UTC272 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

إذا جان عندك خيار تزور مكان غريب بالعالم، تختار هيج مكان لو تفضل الأماكن الهادئة والتقليدية؟

🔥2👏1🤩1

7 May 2026, 18:38 UTC222 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

البحث الخاص بالموضوع عمل سما غسان The Archive Property

4👏2🏆1🔥1

7 May 2026, 18:38 UTC193 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

COVID-19 wasn't just a temporary disease, but a global event that changed human life!! It first appeared in Wuhan..China, in late 2019 and spread quickly around the world.. The virus caused a worldwide pandemic, leading to social isolation, the closure of schools and borders and the suspension of air travel!! Although it created major crises in supplies and daily life it also encouraged the use of online educatio

2❤‍🔥1😍1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Thearchiveiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Archive” (@Thearchiveiq), 686 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Thearchiveiq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.