Channel
@Thoughtsandmeanings
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
768subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002122622716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Thoughtsandmeanings |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Thoughtsandmeanings |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 768 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 777 | +17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 760 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 769 | -15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 784 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 800 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 802 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 27.1% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 15.7% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 7.14% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот интервью Екатерины Гордеевой (признана иностранным агентом) с Олегом Воскобойниковым порекомендовать могу! Оно правда идёт 3,5 часа, а посмотрел я меньше часа - но пока интересно. С Олегом до этого в медиа-пространстве ни разу не сталкивался, а на тему "нового" средневековья в основном слушал и читал у одного из самых заметных писателей современной России Е. Водолазкина. Поэтому интересно послушать другую при…
👍2🔥1
Минутка макроэкономики. «Мысли о смысле» - точно не экономический блог, и я не буду залезать на профессорскую кафедру. Но, обладая все-таки экономическим образованием и даже немного занимаясь «экономической наукой», не могу спокойно проходить мимо рассуждений про некие деньги - вкладчиков или государства, - которые лежат в банках 🏦, а не работают в экономике. В общем, сегодня я ненадолго применю роль эксперта)). Да…
👍4❤2
Полгода назад писал в один журнал колонку про мечты. О том что мечты не равно планы и не надо их декомпозировать и каскадировать. А тут у Андрея Шапенко наткнулся на интересный пост по исследованию взаимосвязи мечт с достижениями для длинном отрезке времени. Очень мне откликается. Мечтайте господа! Мечтать не только не вредно, а очень даже полезно!
ПОЧЕМУ ВАЖНО МЕЧТАТЬ? Готовлюсь к одному выступлению, и нашел неожиданное исследование. Учёные взяли 17 000 человек, которые родились на одной и той же неделе в 1958 году и сделали 10 волн опросов в течение их жизни. Оказалось, что мечты и стремления, сформированные в детстве и подростковом возрасте, предсказывают образовательные и профессиональные достижения к 50 годам, при чем независимо от социального класса и к…
❤3👍2🔥1😁1
В некоторых странах* сотрудник не обязан подтверждать болезнь справкой 📃, а иногда даже раскрывать диагноз 🤒. На несколько дней можно буквально выписать больничный самому - без врача и даже попыток убедительно выглядеть больным 🤧 кашляя в трубку. У нас законодательство строже. Но знаю немало компаний, где людей спокойно отпускают без оформления больничного листа. Если человек говорит «не могу» - значит он действите…
❤3🎉1
О работе с корнями и многом другом говорим во втором сезоне подкаста 🎙️ "Рыбу на стол" - Культурный код. В новом выпуске поговорили с художником Рустамом Усмановым о том, как старые вещи становятся современным искусством и как искать объекты культуры на блошиных рынках. Слушайте на всех популярных подкаст-платформах: Яндекс.музыка Apple Podcast Castbox Telegram
👌1👍1🔥1🤝1😁1
Про "Бессоницу", тень и проявленность. Ездил на выходных на фестиваль «Бессонница» 👁 и вчера рассказывал о нем своему преподавателю по английскому. Ну а так как на английском вокабуляр у меня, конечно, скромнее, чем на русском, приходится иногда упрощать мысли. Рассказываю про карнавал, который является одним из центральных событий мероприятия. Говорю, что это вообще хороший способ выгулять dark side of your Ident…
🔥3❤1👌1👏1😁1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍11🔥1😁1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
А вы используете эмодзи при переписке с сотрудниками?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Меняют ли эмодзи восприятие руководителя? Большая часть управленческой коммуникации сегодня происходит в цифровой среде. Кажется, что эмодзи — незначительная деталь, которая просто делает сообщение более дружелюбным. Однако исследование, опубликованное в International Journal of Business Communication, показывает: даже один эмодзи может повлиять на то, какое впечатление руководитель производит на сотрудников. Автор…
👍3💯1🤔1😁1
Вышел 1-й выпуск 2-го сезона 🎙️«Рыбу на стол». В гости к нам пришла Ольга Касьян и мы поговорили о том, каким прошлым однажды станет наше настоящее. Почему предприниматели и сообщества все чаще оглядываются назад, ищут культурный код, собирают историю компании, города, семьи. Где в этом настоящая опора, а где просто очередные красивые слова, которые потом печатают на стене переговорки. Вообще наследие - странная шт…
👍3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Thoughtsandmeanings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы используете эмодзи при переписке с сотрудниками?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мысли о смысле. Михаил Краев” (@Thoughtsandmeanings), 768 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Thoughtsandmeanings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.