😀Hiện tượng lạ trong ca trực đêm của một nữ sinh viên tại bệnh viện… Trên cái cây trước mặt, có một chiếc lá được đưa liên tục. Nghe qua thì có vẻ bình thường. Lá lay động thì chắc là làm gió thôi, đúng không - nhưng xung quanh đâu có gió
❤1

Channel
@TichTacVn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,877subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002278707013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TichTacVn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TichTacVn |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 10,877 | -7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 10,884 | -36 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 10,920 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 10,916 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 10,917 | -8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 10,925 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 10,928 | +6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 10,922 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:33 | 10,924 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 10,927 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 10,919 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 10,917 | +7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 10,910 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 10,912 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 10,905 | +9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 10,896 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 10,898 | +16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 10,882 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 10,876 | +12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 10,864 | first reading |
164 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 164 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,002 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 164 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 22 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 58.3% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 29.2% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 164 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀Hiện tượng lạ trong ca trực đêm của một nữ sinh viên tại bệnh viện… Trên cái cây trước mặt, có một chiếc lá được đưa liên tục. Nghe qua thì có vẻ bình thường. Lá lay động thì chắc là làm gió thôi, đúng không - nhưng xung quanh đâu có gió
❤1
😀 Một khi đã đam mê là mưa gió chỉ là thử thách, nắng nóng chỉ là gia vị, còn bỏ cuộc thì không có trong từ điển - nể mấy chị quá
😀 NẾP NGOÀI BẮC có thật sự ngon không mà thấy ai củng đòi ăn - đúng là từ ngữ Việt Nam có thể nói là phong phú nhất trên thế giới
😀 Mệt ghê cái này chơi khó thế ai mà đoán được phải chi có khoai củ này củ kia thì nó lại hấp dẫn hơn - có khi lên cá triệu view luôn
😀 Nhìn thấy tưởng sướng nhưng chắc chỉ có chị khách sướng thôi chứ mấy anh KTV làm 1 ngày mấy khách chắc chân tay rụng rời
😀 Trả kèo tóp tóp - tôi cực kỳ lên án hành vi tự làm tổn hại bản thân như này vì ngoài kia hiện nhiều người ko có mà xài ở đây lại lãng phí
😀 Ko rõ em có cần người thoa kem dùm không chứ anh đang rảnh tay lắm - tự mình thoa thì ko thể nào đều bằng người khác được
😀 Tôi nghĩ đây là thiên đường vì bầu không khí và năng lượng toả ra từ đây khiến tôi cảm thấy bình yên hơn bao giờ hết - địa chị ở đâu mình cần đến để xem
😀 Trả kèo tóp tóp - việc nhỏ sáp đèn cầy vào những vùng da mỏng có thể gây bỏng nhẹ hoặc khó chịu khuyến cáo ko nên làm theo
😀 Không rõ chú lượm quần xì vể cho vợ hay là chú lấy luyện bùa ngãi nữa - lần này thôi chứ lần sau là báo công an đấy nhé ông chú biến thái khổ lắm cứ mất hoài tốn tiền
😀 Sáng sớm gặp biến thái : theo em gái chủ clip chia sẻ thấy ảnh đứng củng lâu tưởng đợi giao nhưng khựng lại vài giây thì thấy có điều gì đó rất bất ổn làm cả ngày ế khách
😀 Món Việt và Tây có gì khác nhau không - tất nhiên là khác nhưng ko có nghĩa là ta không được trải nghiệm ẩm thực văn hoá của nước bạn đúng không các anh em
Showing the 12 most recent of 164 posts we hold for @TichTacVn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tích Tắc Scandal💥” (@TichTacVn), 10,877 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TichTacVn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.