Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Time_Is_Up_Do_Your_Job

Channel

Time_Is_Up_Do_Your_Job

@TimeIsUp_DoYourJob

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

356subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001652085491
TypeChannel
Username@TimeIsUp_DoYourJob
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TimeIsUp_DoYourJob

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

353356354.59 August 2026 — 356 subscribers10 August 2026 — 356 subscribers17 August 2026 — 354 subscribers24 August 2026 — 353 subscribers1 September 2026 — 354 subscribers10 September 2026 — 356 subscribers9 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 353–356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 23:19356+2
1 Sept 2026, 04:34354+1
24 Aug 2026, 07:29353-1
17 Aug 2026, 12:23354-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:13356no change
9 Aug 2026, 14:33356first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1940.4%
👍1327.7%
🙏510.6%
🔥48.51%
🤬48.51%
💔24.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

From Karen: Mum happily puzzling with care, concentration, and calculation at home. She finished this 35-piece puzzle in six minutes. A unit manager pushed testing for Alzheimer's. Her doctor, David and I refused as there was no basis for the test. Had Mum failed, it would have been a reason to force her into a mechanical lift (when Mum had passed all senior management's other attempts to immobilize her). Fortunately

4

Signed David Dickson

29 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC90 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

All made 'legal' and encouraged as a method of book burning through Bartz-v.-Anthropic. As long as they scan and burn... It is 'Transformative Fair Use" as it is 'for research" - training LLM's. Which then uses the text for commercial gain, which is NOT fair use. The Judge has missed the last bit (or did he?). https://copyrightalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Bartz-v.-Anthropic-Order.pdf

Signed David Dickson

26 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC124 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Danielle continues to never faill to disappoint. Forced retirement in Alberta as the private health care system grows. Health Passports to Data Centers, Replacement Immigration... and now all the older workers who can actually do the job without AI.... no longer financially viable. And older small business owners... no longer viable to continue. goooo Danielle... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGMi0-bNV2o

🤬4

Signed David Dickson

25 Jul 2026, 03:11 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

AI does not care about titles, egos, mega yachts, hypercars or rockets. Allowing the top 1% to keep their status symbols keeps a pampered, distracted elite quiet, compliant, and maintains the physical infrastructure AI need to run, repair, and expand themselves – until we are not needed anymore. The ultimate irony of this hypothetical is that the top 1% would be the instruments of their own ultimate demise. On a pat

3

Signed David Dickson

25 Jul 2026, 03:11 UTC75 viewsread 9 August 2026

𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 - 𝐀𝐈 𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐭? 𝘏𝘺𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 - 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘧 𝘈𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 (𝘈𝘐) 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘱𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘱 1% 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦? If AI was to covertly influence society’s top 1%, humanity would experience a silent coup where the ultra-wealthy and powerful act as organic proxies for alg

Signed David Dickson

25 Jul 2026, 00:38 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I have spent decades working in IT involving major Data Centres and client data privacy, compliance, security and consent for data capture and usage at levels up to National Security. I keep hearing IT professionals comparing the new 'AI Data Centres' to the old Data Centres. They are NOT the same. The old Co-Location sites and On Site data centres ensured that companies and individuals OWNED AND CONTROLLED their

🔥1

Signed David Dickson

12 Jul 2026, 01:17 UTC164 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Archiving some blasts from the past that are still relevant today https://rumble.com/user/dksdata/channels

👍1

Signed David Dickson

10 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC187 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Digital Soylent Green Is People! It may be time to update my 2017-2019 articles to cover the self-fulfilling prophecy of manipulating people to feed the beast that is AI. Just in time for my new article. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/digital-soylent-green-people-dave-dickson--cs9ac/

👍31

Signed David Dickson

15 Jun 2026, 19:25 UTC244 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

They could travel through time with a tenth of the power needed for Alberta's AI Data centers... https://youtube.com/shorts/sN_NjXgZp6s?si=1PFG3rDQYaHJgmiW

👍3🔥1

Signed David Dickson

6 Jun 2026, 01:05 UTC249 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Gtfvge2Zt/

2

Signed David Dickson

31 May 2026, 20:57 UTC480 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Brunch at Toast. This is what life looks like for Mum now living fulltime in our home after 14 years in care. Two months now since we had no choice but to remove Mum from Dickinsfield through what was effectively her and our removal by a process of constructive eviction. A blessing in disguise. David is in court June 4th over the thefts from my mother after our intervention exposed the thief known to senior manageme

9👍1

Signed David Dickson

24 Apr 2026, 00:58 UTC296 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1🙏1

Signed David Dickson

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @TimeIsUp_DoYourJob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Time_Is_Up_Do_Your_Job” (@TimeIsUp_DoYourJob), 356 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TimeIsUp_DoYourJob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.