Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 星冠 内部频道

Channel

星冠 内部频道

@TkML01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,220subscribers

+462 since we began measuring on 21 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002418455481
TypeChannel
Username@TkML01
Created3 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded21 October 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/TkML01

Growth

11,75812,22011,98921 October 2026 — 11,758 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,853 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,923 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,981 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,009 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,032 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,064 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,105 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,145 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,172 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,220 subscribers21 October 202631 October 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +462. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,689–12,289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 08:0812,220+48
30 Oct 2026, 11:3512,172+27
29 Oct 2026, 14:0912,145+40
28 Oct 2026, 12:2912,105+41
27 Oct 2026, 11:0612,064+32
26 Oct 2026, 09:1012,032+23
25 Oct 2026, 07:0012,009+28
24 Oct 2026, 04:5911,981+58
23 Oct 2026, 08:0411,923+70
22 Oct 2026, 07:0711,853+95
21 Oct 2026, 07:2211,758first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 3 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.36%
avg views ÷ 12,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
777
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.901%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held4 (3 January 2025 – 21 October 2026)
Views total1,554
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1285.7%
❤17.14%
🎉17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2025 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2026, 05:30 UTC234 views6 reactionsread 21 October 2026

想稳定的兄弟们 找客服一对一定制 一机一包 无任何标记 无特征码 星冠能给你的 只有稳定 定制联系:@XingGua123

👍5🎉1

21 Oct 2026, 05:19 UTC≈1,320 views8 reactionsread 21 October 2026

⚜️星冠 StarCrown|内部专属项目 全新版本 业内顶配全功能配齐,你所想的极致上分体验,星冠全部拥有! 对比市面普通游戏优化方案,我们直接降维打击 摒弃花里胡哨的冗余设计,只专注两件事:极致体验、全程稳定 ✨项目核心优势 ✔️精准手感优化——指哪打哪,操作手感直接拉满,先手压制全场 ✔️全局同步视野——开黑组队信息互通,对局节奏尽在掌握 ✔️极速阵容切换——BP环节秒切阵容配置,抢占开局优势 ✔️独立自研算法+高清养眼绘制——运行流畅零卡顿,对局体验拉满 不玩套路,专注品质! 所有功能一站式配齐,想轻松登顶上分,星冠全权安排! 🔥关于品质 定价高端,不做廉价流水线产品 专属适配优化,拒绝批量同质化 郑重承诺:体验不稳,全额退款!!! 以星为冕,实力为王 用极致细节,碾压全场对局 想解锁顶级上分体验,直接联系作者专属定制:@XingGua123 官方频道:https://t.me/TkML01 卡网:htt…

👍7❤1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @TkML01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“星冠 内部频道” (@TkML01), 12,220 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TkML01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.