刷到一个频道后,通常还想找更多同类入口。 SOSO 精选频道会随机推荐一批已收录频道。 适合继续发现相近内容。 🔗 本频道专属邀请链接 https://t.me/sooo?start=autopromo_-1001704558015_2097466703_channels_8d092764

Channel
🪩吃瓜娱乐 🤩 霸凌/抓奸
@Tke_cctv66
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,046subscribers
+722 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001704558015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tke_cctv66 |
| Description | 国内外劲爆吃瓜资讯! 免费代理: @Tke_cctv1 视频投稿拿现金: @cctv66_bot 广告商务: @Tke005 #中文吃瓜 #网红 #霸凌 #抓奸 #打架砍人 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tke_cctv66 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:54 | 53,046 | -15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 53,061 | +14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 53,047 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 53,045 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 53,050 | +19 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 53,031 | +26 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 53,005 | +27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:54 | 52,978 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 52,975 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 52,978 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 52,970 | +31 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 52,939 | +18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 52,921 | -12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 52,933 | +52 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 52,881 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 52,892 | +32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 52,860 | +41 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 52,819 | +56 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 52,763 | +53 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 52,710 | first reading |
Engagement
601 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.76%
- avg views ÷ 53,046 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 403
- 412 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.287%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 414
- of 601 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 200 of 412 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 601 (6 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 166,044 |
| Reactions total | 259 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈33,000
- Videos
- ≈57,600
- Links
- ≈6,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 11m
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 391 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
382 reactions across 263 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 284 | 74.3% | |
| ❤ | 72 | 18.8% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 3.40% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.785% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.524% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.262% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.262% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.262% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.262% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 277 of the 601 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 382 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 601 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
被白衣男子打死了 ?#打架
👍2❤1
⚡️腾云腾云,让您腾云人生⚡️ ✅ 腾云全网上押1000万美金!新人福利领不停,爆率爽翻天 ✅ 支持支付宝/微信/USDT/Okpay 在线秒上下分 🔥放心玩 · 放心赢 · 放心提 ,上亿资金储备,提款秒到! 🎁福利待遇: 1.新人首充福利返100%,充100送100,需本金加彩金5倍流水即可提现! 2.复存固定额外赠送3%,不限新老用户,充值完自行领取 3.日返水高达3%,让您边娱乐边赚钱! 🫴不娱乐的老哥也可以加入我们,实现👑财富自由!不卡活跃不卡新增,直享60%合营! ⚡️腾云专员: @tenyun1 ⚡️官方飞投: @TYDZ_BOT
专卖店【私人付费代理】 👆不限速代理,不限设备👆 店铺网址: https://1.heeh.help/ 👈复制到浏览器打开
新用户首充100送100充588送388 壹号官网: y33vu.top 【备用链接】 亿万官网: 5wyw.top 【备用链接】 问鼎官网: wnw83.top 【备用链接】 金沙国际: 484.lv 电子娱乐城: 82k.lv 人生就是一场赌博 不赌 你怎么翻身? 三十年河东 三十年河西 莫欺少年穷!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 💞💞💞💞💞💞✡️😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀九博官方频道:👉@JBGJ 😀九博官方开奖:👉@JBKJ 😀九博上下分群:👉@jiubovip 😀九博国际主营: ⚡️😀😀😀 ⚡️ 😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀⚡️😀😀❤️😀😀等多种游戏... 🔥九博扫雷点击进入🔥 全新玩法,震撼上线! 热门彩种,火力全开! 激情升级,精彩加倍! 抢先体验,赢在每一局 九博国际放心玩 · 放心赢 · 放心提! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🏦钱包验资: @kpay 💁♀️官方客服: @J111~@J888 💁♀️官方财务: @j444~@j666
⚡️🌈⚡️⚡️8K国际 U投首选综合平台|百亿大盘|值得信赖 ❤️🔥不限IP免实名网址 8k2519.COM 大额出款无忧 🤑以小博大 PG电子 赏金大对决一发入魂 单笔提款81万U 🤑百家乐战神 真人收割机 大佬一天收割150万U 🤑PA战神记录: 在真人百家乐中达成“一周净赚1555万U ”的小目标💥 🎯大户首选 免实名 免手机号 电子可3000U一拉 首存5000U 赠送彩金588U 首存10000U 赠送彩金1288U 首存50000U 赠送彩金5888U 首存100000U 赠送彩金8888U 首存200000U 赠送彩金12888U 👍全网福利天花板 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💎 大额提款送福利,最高可领取88888U奖励 💎 支持任意平台vip等级平移 💎 每笔存款加增1% 每日提款额度无上限 💎 电子游戏反水1%起 最高3% 每日返水无上限 U存U…
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验 😀 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 😀 🔝好品牌,实力派: 78.COM 无需标签,本身便是最好的辨识度 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中➕四全中,每注100U,开出4个号码。7000U的本钱,命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 客户充150U,狂赚79万U,已提款50万U 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款500万…
这样揍你了 #打女人 又是恐婚的一天 !
求助,这是谁的责任啊,车开的已经很小心了
#按摩 放松一哈 #合集
❤1
安徽一男子发视频称,妻子患淋巴癌,在武汉医院治疗快一年,盼望很久 120万一针 的药终于到来!以为能救她的命! 由于时间过长,用了六天之后,一场欢喜一场空,还是离开了人间! 没能挽回爱妻的生命,男子很悲伤很惭愧:用我的命换她的命有多好啊。
Showing the 12 most recent of 601 posts we hold for @Tke_cctv66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hgwzcd · 254,335#1
@YouWang888 · 533#2
@baojiang888 · 4,905#3
@gydl6 · 149,930#4
@Tke_cctv1 · 27,574#5
@dalidianzi · 22,604#6
@chiguaniu · 60,867#7
@XG_6666 · 140,843#8
@SYHTBP · 2,502#9
@aikun · 48,025#10
@httpsln9dy1E9MN1lZWQ1 · 4,081#11
@DNYTJL3 · 95,275#12
@yazhou · 32,284#13
@c555 · 46,703#14
@dzxz666 · 1,652#15
@dzxz6 · 3,523#16
@ndsss · 150,883#17
@XG_0001 · 219,434#18
@BP6699 · 9,099#19
@sc28q · 1,796#20
@MTPGY · 29,586#21
@tgt66669 · 23,279#22
@dianfeng6699 · 1,832#23
@HTGG8 · 913#24
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chiguaniu · 60,867
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 22 August 2026
@ndsss · 150,883
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🪩吃瓜娱乐 🤩 霸凌/抓奸” (@Tke_cctv66), 53,046 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tke_cctv66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.