Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gtfarh

Channel

Gtfarh

@Tommyupdates

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

-34,708 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002679049745
TypeChannel
Username@Tommyupdates
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tommyupdates

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ggupdatez/25945 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC@Tommyupdates/5000 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC1.0021 hours
@ggupdatez/26037 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC@Tommyupdates/5006 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@Tommyupdates/5007 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC@ggupdatez/26047 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC1.00under a minute
@Tommyupdates/5008 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC@ggupdatez/26057 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@Tommyupdates/5011 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC@ggupdatez/26067 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@ggupdatez/26077 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC@Tommyupdates/5012 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ggupdatez8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@ggupdatez (6–2)
@oluwaskid_official6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0040 minutes@oluwaskid_official (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 12 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @ggupdatez. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6934,77717,4237 August 2026 — 34,777 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,777 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,759 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,539 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,448 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,357 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,252 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,070 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,932 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,826 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,739 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,616 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,493 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33,365 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33,341 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,303 subscribers26 August 2026 — 34,044 subscribers27 August 2026 — 34,186 subscribers28 August 2026 — 34,330 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,739 subscribers30 August 2026 — 34,512 subscribers31 August 2026 — 34,414 subscribers5 October 2026 — 69 subscribers7 August 20265 October 2026
24 measurements spanning 59 days, net -34,708. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 22:5569-34,345
31 Aug 2026, 06:0934,414-98
30 Aug 2026, 07:0334,512-227
29 Aug 2026, 05:5934,739+409
28 Aug 2026, 06:3834,330+144
27 Aug 2026, 06:3734,186+142
26 Aug 2026, 03:0234,044+741
25 Aug 2026, 04:2833,303-38
23 Aug 2026, 23:1533,341-24
22 Aug 2026, 05:5433,365-128
20 Aug 2026, 18:2733,493-123
19 Aug 2026, 15:3433,616-123
18 Aug 2026, 12:4433,739-87
17 Aug 2026, 09:5533,826-106
15 Aug 2026, 18:1833,932-138
14 Aug 2026, 06:3834,070-182
13 Aug 2026, 00:1634,252-105
11 Aug 2026, 22:4534,357-91
11 Aug 2026, 00:1134,448-91
9 Aug 2026, 21:1134,539first reading

Engagement

242 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 242 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

519 reactions across 185 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28154.1%
👍23044.3%
🔥50.963%
😁20.385%
😱10.193%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 242 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 242 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 242 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tommyupdates. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 242 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC47 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🚨 USDC AIRDROP IS LIVE! 🚨 💰 Free USDC rewards are available now! 🎁 Instant wallet distribution ⚡ No claiming fee 🔗 Join & check your eligibility: https://t.me/Usdcbnbblockchainpaybot?start=8561596060 🔥 Spots may be limited — don’t miss out! 💎 Join now and see what you can claim!

👍1

Signed Legit

30 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC117 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Promoter only https://t.me/+5ayXmHYrjexhNDJk

❤1👍1

Signed Legit

30 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC140 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026

One space left 🙄 @dailyupdatttbot

❤2👍1

Signed Legit

30 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC176 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

New bot coming Dm for promotion 2k per space 200+ users @dailyupdatttbot

👍3❤1

Signed Legit

30 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC184 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Claim Free 1USDT Here Join And Verify CAPTCHA

👍2

Signed Tomiwa.eth

30 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC207 views6 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Third Withdrawal Recived From Eht Usdt https://t.me/EHTUSDTBot?start=ref_7681039075

❤5👍1

Signed Tomiwa.eth

30 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC190 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026

New bot coming Dm for promotion 2k per space 200+ users @dailyupdatttbot

❤1👍1

Signed Legit

30 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC204 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Payment Dropping Loot Bag Upto 100$ USDT https://t.me/EHTUSDTBot?start=ref_7681039075

👍1

Signed Tomiwa.eth

30 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC200 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Claim Free 1USDT Here Join And Verify CAPTCHA

👍2

Signed Tomiwa.eth

30 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC223 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

First Withdrawal Recived From Eht Usdt 0.1$ Per Ref 1$ Minimum Withdrawal https://t.me/EHTUSDTBot?start=ref_7681039075 Bag Bag

👍2

Signed Tomiwa.eth

29 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC286 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

First Withdrawal Of ₦6,300 Received From Playtok Steps:👇 °•Register And Use ₦2,500 Free Bet(Compulsory Before You Loot) °•Loot Multiple Accounts And Withdraw °•Use Multispace Or Clone Master For looting https://playtok.win/app_ngn.html?userId=9250917&currency=NGN&from=earncash

👍2❤1

Signed Tomiwa.eth

29 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC301 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026

If your phone is eSIM enabled it works also for Androids

👍2❤1

Signed •Kami 

Showing the 12 most recent of 242 posts we hold for @Tommyupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gtfarh” (@Tommyupdates), 69 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tommyupdates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.