Now Iโm gonna focus on the Inner Circle! If you want all the signals, pm me now! @Top1Trades_LiveChat
๐4โค2๐2๐คฉ1

Channel
@Top1Trades
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
15,105subscribers
-170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002144761347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Top1Trades |
| Description | Welcome To The No 1 Trading Community. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Top1Trades |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:08 | 15,105 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 15,119 | -25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 15,144 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 15,153 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 15,160 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 15,161 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 15,172 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 15,167 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 15,163 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 15,172 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 15,181 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 15,200 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 15,215 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 15,226 | -16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 15,242 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 15,254 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 15,246 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 15,248 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 15,245 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 15,249 | first reading |
442 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 440 of 442 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 442 (7 August 2026 โ 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 172,592 |
| Reactions total | 5,022 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 17:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 2 September 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
5,022 reactions across 440 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 1,520 | 30.3% | |
| ๐ | 1,239 | 24.7% | |
| ๐ฅ | 874 | 17.4% | |
| ๐ฏ | 338 | 6.73% | |
| ๐คฉ | 323 | 6.43% | |
| ๐ | 221 | 4.40% | |
| ๐ณ | 94 | 1.87% | |
| ๐ | 90 | 1.79% | |
| โก | 70 | 1.39% | |
| ๐ | 56 | 1.12% | |
| ๐คฏ | 53 | 1.06% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 25 | 0.498% | |
| ๐ | 24 | 0.478% | |
| ๐ | 23 | 0.458% | |
| ๐ | 18 | 0.358% | |
| ๐ | 16 | 0.319% | |
| ๐ | 15 | 0.299% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 0.179% | |
| ๐ค | 6 | 0.119% | |
| ๐ญ | 5 | 0.1% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 0.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 440 of the 442 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 5,022 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 442 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Now Iโm gonna focus on the Inner Circle! If you want all the signals, pm me now! @Top1Trades_LiveChat
๐4โค2๐2๐คฉ1
Settle recovery yeah ๐ค
โค6๐2๐ฅ2๐1๐คฉ1
Fly Away!! ๐ TP2 Hit! Running +122pips from lowest entries! ๐ฏ Secure some, set BEโs if you want to hold๐ Personally, I closed all my positions๐ต
๐4โค2๐ฏ2๐ณ1๐คฉ1๐1
Fly Goldie! ๐ TP1 Hit! Running +72pips from lowest entries! ๐ฏ Secure your entries and set BE if want to hold๐
๐6โค3๐2๐ฏ2๐ณ1
GOLD BUY NOW @ 4330 TP1: 4335 TP2: 4340 SL: 4320
๐6โค3๐ณ2๐ฅ2๐คฉ1
Ready Recovery!
๐5โค2๐2๐คฉ2
Spiked & Hit SL for this news setup.
โค4๐2๐ฅ2๐1๐คฉ1
GOLD SELL NOW @ 4332 TP1: 4327 TP2: 4322 SL: 4342
๐4โค2๐ฏ2๐คฏ2๐คฉ1
Ready Signal!
๐4โค2๐ฅ2๐ณ1
Want to try a news setup? High Risk!
โค6๐2๐คฉ2๐ฏ1๐1
๐คฉ MEDIUM IMPACT NEWS ๐คฉ MIDWEEK VOLATILITY WINDOW LOADINGโฆ โณ Tonight gives the market another read on the U.S. labour picture. Prediction isnโt required. Sources: https://www.forexfactory.com
๐ฅ4โค3๐2๐1๐1๐1
Video, posted without a caption
โค5๐ฅ3๐2๐1๐1๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 442 posts we hold for @Top1Trades. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ITโS DAY 3. WHATโS MORE IMPORTANT TO YOU RIGHT NOW?
The shares total 233%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ready for next trade or you guys done for this week!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How selective are you planning to be today? ๐
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Day 3 check-in: Whatโs your biggest focus today? ๐
The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Midweek question: when do you know your bias is wrong? ๐ค
The shares total 192%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How are you reading Gold ahead of tonightโs news? ๐ซ
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 442 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โTOP 1% TRADES ๐ฅโ (@Top1Trades), 15,105 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Top1Trades.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.