زمانی پخته میشی که میفهمی نیازی نیست به هر چیزی واکنش نشون بدی.

Channel
توسکا
@Toscaland
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,160subscribers
+3,629 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001992021252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Toscaland |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Toscaland |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 17,160 | -28 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 17,188 | -38 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 17,226 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 17,253 | -35 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 17,288 | -34 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 17,322 | -43 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 17,365 | -36 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 17,401 | -31 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 17,432 | -46 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 17,478 | -61 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 17,539 | -62 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 17,601 | -42 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 17,643 | +158 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:12 | 17,485 | +75 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:08 | 17,410 | +180 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 17,230 | -168 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 17,398 | -199 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 17,597 | +662 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 16,935 | +2,063 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 14,872 | first reading |
Engagement
197 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 197 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 20
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 16
- of 196 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Toscaland. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 197 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
«و حالا میخواهم از خودم به شدت مراقبت کنم؛حداقل به همان شدتی که از آدمهای دیگر زندگیام مراقبت میکنم. خودم را تنها نمیگذارم،خودم را نادیده نمیگیرم، دوباره خود را گم نمیکنم.» کتاب خودم را بیشتر دوست دارم
Photo, posted without a caption
[ پادکست هشت گام موفقیت - رادیو راه ] موفقیت، نه مقصد است و نه یک ایستگاهِ نهایی؛ موفقیت همان کیفیتِ بودنِ ما در مسیر است.مجتبی شکوری در پادکست «هشت گام موفقیت» (رادیو راه)، دستِ ما رو میگیره و از هزارتویِ تعاریفِ سمیِ موفقیت بیرون میاره. او به ما یاد میده که چطور به جایِ «تند دویدن»، «عمیق زیستن» رو تمرین کنیم. «دانلود فایل گام اول و دوم»
تیکه کتاب فروغ فرخزاد
تیکه کتاب داستایفسکی
تیکه کتاب صادق هدایت
- چرا گریه میکنی اون فقط یه چنله تیکه کتابای اون چنل: @Tikeketab
فقط نوستالژی بازا قدر این آهنگو میدونن؛ «بامنگوشکن»
؛
«داشتن مغز دلیل بر انسان بودن نیست پسته و بادام هم مغز دارند…! برای انسان بودن باید شعور داشت.» کتاب بیشعوری
نوشتهای برای خودم؛ هیچکس ارزش استرس بیش از حد رو نداره، ادامه بده، آدم ها را پشت سرت رها کن و خودت را پیدا کن، جهان برای توست.
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @Toscaland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Avay_eDaryaa · 3,8314 postsحِیرانی؛
@Heyranii_1 · 5,1933 postsزیـرِسـوزنِگِـرامـافـون
@GramoMusic · 20,6092 postsهَذیون
@hazy0on · 3,2762 postsجنوبی!🌴
@Jonob_6 · 39,7152 postsmusic sepehr
@musicam · 1,5022 posts«آرشیو توسکا»
@Archivetoscaland · 1261 postبهاره منفرد
@BaharehMonfared · 1,3601 postClassical Music
@music · 90,8761 postRemix | ریمیکس
@Remix · 71,3531 postویرانهنشین
@Viraneh_neshin · 8941 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Toscaland named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bislull · 35,475
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توسکا” (@Toscaland), 17,160 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Toscaland.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.