الان بهتر دقیق تر میزنه بازدید ؟ کامنت کنید
❤22👍14🤣6☃5
Signed Edi Ros

Channel
@Tproseen
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
23,785subscribers
+3,043 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003209704072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tproseen |
| Description | ربات: @TproFaBot وبسایت مادر: Ntgrf.com |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tproseen |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:36 | 23,785 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:51 | 23,787 | +20 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:26 | 23,767 | -19 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:38 | 23,786 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 23,799 | +30 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:34 | 23,769 | +21 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:35 | 23,748 | +60 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 23,688 | +46 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 23,642 | +49 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:00 | 23,593 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 23,607 | -96 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 23,703 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 23,707 | +97 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 23,610 | +21 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 23,589 | +40 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 23,549 | +36 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 23,513 | +30 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 23,483 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:11 | 23,486 | +41 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:54 | 23,445 | first reading |
138 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 138 (20 February 2026 – 28 October 2026) |
| Views total | 155,363 |
| Reactions total | 17,590 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 11:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
20,189 reactions across 123 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11,430 | 56.6% | |
| 👍 | 5,542 | 27.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1,197 | 5.93% | |
| 🤣 | 723 | 3.58% | |
| 👎 | 390 | 1.93% | |
| 😭 | 242 | 1.20% | |
| ❤🔥 | 137 | 0.679% | |
| 💔 | 109 | 0.54% | |
| 🌚 | 105 | 0.52% | |
| 💘 | 62 | 0.307% | |
| 💋 | 50 | 0.248% | |
| 🍓 | 47 | 0.233% | |
| 💯 | 28 | 0.139% | |
| 🫡 | 27 | 0.134% | |
| 🖕 | 25 | 0.124% | |
| 👻 | 23 | 0.114% | |
| 🍾 | 16 | 0.079% | |
| ☃ | 12 | 0.059% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 0.054% | |
| 😇 | 7 | 0.035% | |
| 3 further kinds | 6 | 0.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tproseen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 February 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (5.77%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
الان بهتر دقیق تر میزنه بازدید ؟ کامنت کنید
❤22👍14🤣6☃5
Signed Edi Ros
تست 50 هزار بازدید 10000 ری اکشن لایک ❤️ 5000 ری اکشن 👍 1000 ری اکشن 🔥 این موارد روی همین پست ثبت و ارسال خواهند شد.
❤10,100👍5,010🔥1,010🤣37💯3☃2🤗2🫡2
Signed Edi Ros
🤗 10 تا قابلبیت جدید ربات شما در کامنت ها بگید و اخر پیامتون شناسه کاربری هم بزارید تا بهتون سکه هدیه بدم! باید قابلیتی بگید که دیگران نگفتند:
❤11🔥3👍2
Signed Edi Ros
ریاکشن و بازدید فعلی! میتونی ریاکشن و بازدید فعلی قبل سفارش ببینی و بعد اینکه تکمیل شد مقایسه کنی و دیگه یادت نمیره قبل ثبت سفارش چند تا از اون ریاکشن خورده بود بریم بعدی؟ 🤗
❤31❤🔥6🍓2👍2🔥2😇2
Signed Edi Ros
ضد اشتباه ! اگر ریاکشنی که قصد سفارش دارید در کانال مورد نظر فعال نباشه برای جلوگیری از سوختن سکه ها هشدار میده که ریاکشن در کانال موردنظر فعال نیست.🤗 بریم قابلیت بعدی؟
❤54🤣6🔥3❤🔥2🌚2🍓2👍2💯2
Signed Edi Ros
🤗 من قابلیت های جدید ربات رو میگم شما لایک کنید بدونم دنبال میکنید…
❤38👍4🔥4🤣4🍓2
Signed Edi Ros
✅ بروزرسانی تکمیل شد. چندین سرور قدرتمند و 18 هزار اکانت کمکی اضافه شدند, اکنون هر سفارش با الگورتیم سطح بالایی برای تکمیل شدن خود تلاش میکند, و هیچ سفارشی نیمه تمام یا اختلال نخواهد داشت, باتشکر پیگیری سفارش ها جدی تر و کامل تر شده است, بخش ظاهری ربات کامل تغییر یافته است, اکنون به فصل جدید سلام کنید.
🔥25❤13👍2💘2
Signed Edi Ros
امروز یک وبسرویس قدرتمند طراحی میکنیم! 1- شما سفارش میدهید, بلافاصله سیستم ما بازدید فعلی پست را چک میکند! 2- دیگه کاری نداریم, وقتی سیستم اطلاعیه تکمیل صادر میکنه قبل رسیدن به شما همون سیستم مجدد بازدید چک میکنه و باید دقیقا بازدید فعلی + بازدید سفارش + نتیجه ای که انتظار داره! -3 اگر بازدید حتی 1 عدد کمتر از حالت مورد انتظار باشه اینجا سیستم مجدد خودش بدون هزینه مجدد مقدار کم بود سفارش میده... 4- در نتیجه دیگه …
❤34💘18❤🔥5👍2🔥2
Signed Edi Ros
فحش بدین ببینم چی واسه گفتن دارید ناشناس عمو ادی: https://t.me/HarfgoBot?start=T0x61wta
🤣7🫡1😭1
Signed Edi Ros
ربات زیرو رو کنم ؟
🤣30✍4🌚3❤1
Signed Edi Ros
خب جالب تر نبود ؟ 😔
🍓3💯1
Signed Edi Ros
تازه اسباب کشی کرده بودیم طبقه دوم خونه ی پدربزرگم صبح رفتم در هال باز کنم دیدم ننه جونم با بابابزرگ بغل هم خوابیده بودن با یه تشک و با یه پتو وقتی در و باز کردم ترسیدن منم تاحالا این جوری شو ندیده بودم اولین بارم بود خیلی جا خوردم دیدم نسبت به پدربزرگ مادر بزرگا عوض شد😂😂😂
🤣6🌚1😭1
Signed Edi Ros
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @Tproseen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 3 posts on @Tproseen as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tpro” (@Tproseen), 23,785 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tproseen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.