Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 41 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,905–12,008 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 14:20
11,917
-17
13 Sept 2026, 21:36
11,934
-16
12 Sept 2026, 05:56
11,950
-17
10 Sept 2026, 03:21
11,967
-11
6 Sept 2026, 19:18
11,978
-3
4 Sept 2026, 03:59
11,981
-4
2 Sept 2026, 20:46
11,985
-6
1 Sept 2026, 20:53
11,991
-4
29 Aug 2026, 17:59
11,995
-1
8 Aug 2026, 19:21
11,996
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:03
11,996
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 11,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,700
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
91 (26 October 2025 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
86,490
Reactions total
1,939
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14m 27s
Average length
2m 04s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,438 reactions across 89 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,166
39.8%
🔥
1,558
28.7%
❤
1,206
22.2%
👀
129
2.37%
🤣
99
1.82%
😢
62
1.14%
🤡
48
0.883%
💯
35
0.644%
😱
32
0.588%
🙏
22
0.405%
💘
20
0.368%
🤓
20
0.368%
🏆
16
0.294%
🆒
15
0.276%
👻
10
0.184%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Статуя Свободы - знаменитый символ США, была сделана французским скульптором. Прообразом послужила французская модель.
Скульптор Фредерик Огюст Бартольди назвал свое творение “Свобода, озаряющая мир”.
Сперва ее планировалось продать в Египет. Статуя должна была называться «Египет, несущий свет в Азию». Но глава страны подсчитал, что бюджет не потянет такой масштабный проект.
Статую профинансировала Франция в чест…
🦛 Бегемоты вовсе не такие жирные, какими кажутся. Ученые измерили состав их тела, и оказалось, что средний процент жира в организме бегемота составляет всего 6,3%.
Если бы бегемот был человеком, то он выглядел бы, как хорошо сложенный атлет.
Почему же внешность бегемота столь обманчива? Ведь они выглядят очень толстыми, люди даже ругательство популярное придумали: «жирный, как бегемот!».
Причин две. Первая – скеле…
На фото - подводный морской кабель в поперечном сечении. Кабели довольно дорогие, установить их - целый масштабный проект. Поэтому на них, как правило, скидывается несколько крупных телекоммуникационных компаний. Эти кабели супернадежны. Россия сейчас реализует аналогичный амбициозный проект, правда не между континентами, а внутри страны - от Мурманска до Владивостока вдоль Северного морского пути.
Самым выдающимся пиратом всех времён считается китаянка Чинг Ши. Ранее она занималась проституцией, но затем смогла создать мощный флот, состоящий из 2000 кораблей. Под её руководством 70 тысяч пиратов были воспитаны благодаря строгой дисциплине и жёстким мерам наказания.
👩 Так выглядела древняя женщина, жившая 4000 лет назад на территории современной Швеции.
Она была похоронена вместе с семилетним мальчиком, вероятно сыном. Женщине было около 30 лет, рост составлял 150 см. Она была не высокой даже по меркам своего времени.
У нее был довольно хороший рацион для своего времени. У нее не было следов травм или недоедания. Скорее всего, вместе с сыном она скончалась от какой-то болезни.…
Нет, это не инопланетный монстр и не фотошоп
На фото - самец африканской яканы. Он прячет своих цыплят под крыльями, чтобы им было тепло и сухо.
Редкий случай заботы со стороны птиц-самцов, которые обычно не проявляют интереса к потомству. У африканских якан самцы заботятся и о яйцах и о вылупившихся цыплятах.
Самки же меняют самцов, откладывают яйца и уходят к следующему самцу, оставляя заботу о потомстве ему цел…
Огромный портрет-лабиринт Бетховена на поле в Германии
Портрет немецкого композитора Людвига ван Бетховена в форме огромного лабиринта появился на одном из полей подсолнухов в Германии, пишет «Ридус».
Необычный портрет создала семья баварских фермеров из города Уттинг-ам-Аммерзе. Выяснилось, что они разрабатывают лабиринты на протяжении более 20 лет. Портрет Бетховена Коринн и Ули Эрнст создали к 250-летию со дня ро…
🐹 На видео – сурок принимает душ. Очень важный и спокойный!
Сурки – грызуны, близкие родственники белкам. Однако крупнее их – могут весить по несколько килограммов (рекордсмен весил аж 11 кг!).
Сурки удобны в качестве домашних животных. Они довольны умны и коммуникабельны. Но, как и всех грызунов, их лучше держать в клетках. Потому что без присмотра могут поломать предметы и погрызть комнатные растения.
👬 Любопытн…
Женщины демонстрируют, что можно было купить на 1,34 доллара в 1918 и 1945 годах.
👍31🤓20👀16
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @TraceTheMaps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“След на карте” (@TraceTheMaps), 11,917 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraceTheMaps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
