Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trading Avizor

Channel

Trading Avizor

@TradingAvizor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,101subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001479479723
TypeChannel
Username@TradingAvizor
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TradingAvizor

Growth

3,1013,1293,1157 August 2026 — 3,129 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,129 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,128 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,125 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,121 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,120 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,119 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,115 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,106 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,101 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,097–3,133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:373,101-5
31 Aug 2026, 03:133,106-9
27 Aug 2026, 21:583,115-4
24 Aug 2026, 15:353,119-1
20 Aug 2026, 21:483,120-1
13 Aug 2026, 23:273,121-4
10 Aug 2026, 19:423,125-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:363,128-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:313,129no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:203,129first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

448 reactions across 21 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24454.5%
🔥357.81%
👏337.37%
👍316.92%
🤣306.70%
81.79%
🌭61.34%
💋61.34%
💊51.12%
😁51.12%
😍51.12%
🤷‍♂51.12%
🍌40.893%
🍓30.67%
🐳30.67%
😱30.67%
🤯30.67%
🍾20.446%
🎄20.446%
🎉20.446%
8 further kinds132.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC369 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/VQaal4P6_O8?is=kNn1GSd_5cnAbKd_

5👍4

5 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC588 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/M0xBLoiyVnc?is=aga2LQG1nFQGuPLy

13👏3👍1💊1💘1

3 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC830 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/ac24b9dHIfY?is=QTVpLLji7PtB54c6

8👍3🤯3🌭2🤷‍♂1

1 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,140 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Vamos a ver. Viendo que hay demasiada gente preocupada con lo ocurrido con ColdCard, voy a escribir un correo hablando de un elemento fundamental que todos aquellos que han sido hackeados no han tenido en cuenta. Es demencial que haya gente haciéndose llamar bitcoiner y no tenga ni puta idea de cómo proteger correctamente sus bitcoin. También me parece acojonante que haya personas que no investiguen mínimamente en

21👏7🐳3💊3🎄2👍1

31 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,140 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Por si te preocupa esta vulnerabilidad, mientras no tengas una ColdCard puedes estar tranquilo. Y digo más. Si tienes la hardwallet que llevo usando años y la única que he recomendado públicamente, más tranquilo puedes estar. Es esta. Abajo. https://l1nq.com/enlzuxk Tecnología suiza, chavalote.

14👏8👍3😍2🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,070 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/ge6xylgrV4Y?is=jFWnGJ6vD9G6tr0w

10😁3💊1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,170 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/3zEPslSOtoI?is=YmDYy4AvbJ3WOZyg

14🔥3🌭2❤‍🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,310 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/tf2m8fnRg1s?is=8w0X1CS-0KFzSARr

12👏2🔥2👍1

24 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,440 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/3yGutzUPinE?is=Kg-MUwsstSUi-VqY

105🤷‍♂3👍2🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,370 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/gnNTcfmWx7I?is=QydkV7rfHAl838mK

11👏4💋3😱2👍1

20 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,380 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/aLcCMX_eAb0?is=iU4xrZtUtYw07oz7 Y… 🇪🇸😏

13🔥4🍓3🍾2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @TradingAvizor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Alex Ruiz | Canal Oficial
@joinalexruiz · 34,809
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Invertir Desde Cero Oficial
@invertirdesdecero_oficial · 53,501
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trading Avizor” (@TradingAvizor), 3,101 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradingAvizor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.