Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tree

Channel

Tree

@Tree_Ramblings

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,034subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001926036916
TypeChannel
Username@Tree_Ramblings
Created2 July 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tree_Ramblings

Growth

3,0343,0813,057.57 August 2026 — 3,081 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,081 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,077 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,070 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,062 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,061 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,059 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,053 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,047 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,041 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,034 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,027–3,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:213,034-7
2 Sept 2026, 15:343,041-6
30 Aug 2026, 10:043,047-6
27 Aug 2026, 10:463,053-6
24 Aug 2026, 12:063,059-2
20 Aug 2026, 15:483,061-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:143,062-8
14 Aug 2026, 07:453,070-7
10 Aug 2026, 18:313,077-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:313,081no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:233,081first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 2 July 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,928 reactions across 9 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79041.0%
🔥32917.1%
👍26813.9%
🤣1628.40%
🫡713.68%
😁442.28%
🎄361.87%
🎉241.24%
😭231.19%
👾211.09%
🗿180.934%
👀130.674%
😨120.622%
🤪110.571%
🦄110.571%
🐳100.519%
🌭90.467%
🍾80.415%
🙏80.415%
🥱80.415%
18 further kinds522.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,928 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2023 to 5 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2024, 01:19 UTC≈6,590 views183 reactionsread 7 August 2026

had the "only" part right need to work on direction next time

🤣111😭23😁1412🤪11👎4🎄3🤝3

16 Jul 2024, 11:05 UTC≈17,100 views362 reactionsread 7 August 2026

gm up only soon

240🔥52🎉18🎄15🥱8🙏8👀6👍6

25 Dec 2023, 23:59 UTC≈16,700 views190 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Few thoughts posted in $TREE discord wrt ETF plays next 2 weeks

🔥11236🫡17🎄7💯6❤‍🔥3👍3💩2

13 Jul 2023, 18:26 UTC≈24,900 views233 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Well that went faster than I anticipated.

121🤣47🔥14🫡12🍾8👍8😁8👀7

13 Jul 2023, 17:22 UTC≈23,400 views158 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Congrats on Ripple trade. Still holding a decent amount, this is a massive partial win and blow to the SEC. Good odds it keeps grinding over the next week and carries ETH and any altcoin that was "maybe a security" or sued by the SEC with it. 80c as obvious target and $1 for the meme after that.

105👍21🔥16👾8🎄7🤬1

11 Jul 2023, 21:36 UTC≈20,000 views170 reactionsread 7 August 2026

CPI tomorrow, will probably be longing <=0.1% headline && <= 0.1% core, shorting >=0.5% headline && >=0.5% core for a quick bot swing. CPI numbers broadcast to everyone on Tree News ws as usual. I ultimately believe dips are for buying until at least the next set of remarks on the ETFs (which could be next week). Most of your attention should still be focused on catching the next SEC remarks on ETFs (long, short BTC

99🫡30👍27🎄4🎉3😁3🌭2👻2

2 Jul 2023, 11:47 UTC≈16,100 views192 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Both the BTC BlackRock long and long-term ETH bags are doing good, but closing only half of the Doge long on the rocket nonsense was a clear mistake. I still believe current prices are cheap, but the fact its future hinges a lot on Elon's mental instability is a clear issue. Personal plan is, ideally, to hold the BTC long for the rest of the year at least while closely monitoring the ETF situation. The fact the SEC

118🔥28👍19👾5🖕5🐳4🦄4😁4

2 Jul 2023, 11:47 UTC≈12,000 views164 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tree positions update: -Long $5.6m BTC @ 26535 avg, +$730k uPNL -Long $1.4m DOGE @ 0.082 avg, -$317k uPNL Spot long-term: -1475 ETH @ ~$1600 avg

🔥10016🫡12😨12😁10👍7🐳6🌚1

2 Jul 2023, 10:17 UTC≈10,600 views276 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Will be using this channel to post some more content/ramblings/thoughts on market, trading and positions. Don't expect calls on shitcoins.

👍17743🗿18🌭7🔥7🦄7👾5🤓5

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Tree_Ramblings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tree News
@TreeNewsFeed · 34,740
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 106,391
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
方程式新闻 BWEnews
@BWEnews · 72,813
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tree” (@Tree_Ramblings), 3,034 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tree_Ramblings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.