Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trilogy Development | Новости

Channel

Trilogy Development | Новости

@TrilogyDevelopment

Not marked by Telegram, checked 19 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

332subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002231231966
TypeChannel
Username@TrilogyDevelopment
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TrilogyDevelopment

Growth

33233433318 August 2026 — 334 subscribers19 August 2026 — 333 subscribers1 September 2026 — 332 subscribers18 August 20261 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 332–334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:36332-1
19 Aug 2026, 07:43333-1
18 Aug 2026, 14:30334first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 07s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

256 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6425.0%
👍5722.3%
🔥3915.2%
😁207.81%
155.86%
💩103.91%
👏93.52%
😱93.52%
👎72.73%
😈51.95%
🤯51.95%
🥰51.95%
🍌31.17%
💘20.781%
😍20.781%
🤡20.781%
💋10.391%
🤮10.391%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2025, 12:51 UTC857 views9 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @livesampPhoto

🙏 Нужна ваша помощь У нашего редактора Романа Грудова беда — его мама, Анна Васильевна, борется с раком сигмовидной кишки 4 стадии. Лечение длительное и очень дорогостоящее. Перед каждым курсом химиотерапии нужно проходить новые обследования и сдавать анализы. А часть исследований недоступна в государственной поликлинике, поэтому семье приходится ездить в другие области и обращаться в частные клиники. Общая сумма,

9

22 May 2025, 09:14 UTC≈1,570 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026

#TrilogySAMP@TrilogyDevelopment Друзья, предложение все еще актуальное, у Вас есть шанс внести свой вклад в разработку, даже если вы представляете какой-либо проект. Связаться вы можете: @yura625, @sssecretway

1

20 Apr 2025, 21:38 UTC≈1,960 views5 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Arizona API так-же обновлено, ошибок с загрузкой скриптов больше нет, и ссылка на тему с библиотекой исправна. Ссылка на скачивание: https://www.blast.hk/threads/222392/ Огромное спасибо @mtg_mods за тесты библиотеки ❤️

2👍1🤡1🥰1

20 Apr 2025, 21:21 UTC≈2,400 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

#TrilogyLoader@TrilogyDevelopment 🤯Обновление 0.12.4: - Исправлена загрузка на лаунчере Arizona.

👍5😍2💩1

20 Apr 2025, 21:14 UTC≈1,580 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026

#TrilogyLoader@TrilogyDevelopment Обновлению быть (в том числе и для Arizona API) 🥹

🔥21😁1

1 Apr 2025, 05:24 UTC≈2,510 views35 reactionsread 18 August 2026

В общем и целом. Проект "TrilogyLoader" был полностью продан "Arizona Games". Все исходники и наработки мультиплеера, включая отдельную ветку с отдельным сервером/клиентом (которые должны были стать новым мультиплеером) были проданы проекту "Pears Project". Отдельное спасибо всем, кто поддерживал нас все это время. Через неделю группа так же перейдет во владение "Pears Project". Всем удачи 🤙

😁18💩8😱71🔥1

7 Mar 2025, 17:50 UTC≈2,120 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026

#TrilogySAMP Привет. Есть ли среди вас люди которые разбираются в Unreal Engine 4? Мы столкнулись с проблемой на моменте подгрузки SAMP'овских моделей в игру. Пытались подгрузить модели через игровые .dat/.ide файлы, место в игровом массиве CModelInfo::ms_aModelInfoPtrs выделяется, но сами модели не подгружаются. Будем весьма благодарны за любую информацию по поводу подгрузки моделей Unreal Engine. Для связи може

4👍4🔥2

27 Feb 2025, 11:11 UTC≈1,880 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

04.25?😐 Новостей не было почти месяц, но все вроде живые из команды

👏9👍2🔥2

8 Feb 2025, 16:21 UTC≈1,860 views21 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

В SAMP Reborn вышло обновление где добавили интеграцию Trilogy Multiplayer. Как только клиент будет доступен для всех, вы сможете подключаться к серверам именно через него. Переключение находится на скриншоте.

🔥16🥰2💩1🤡1🤮1

1 Feb 2025, 01:19 UTC≈1,710 views19 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

В перерывах между разработкой можем позволить себе поблядовать на HackMySoftware

🔥143🥰2

30 Jan 2025, 10:48 UTC≈3,330 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

😎 Подключаться на сервера с Trilogy Multiplayer можно будет с помощью лаунчера SA:MP Reborn от MrCreepTon

👍17😈2🍌1

25 Jan 2025, 12:24 UTC≈1,520 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Именно так решаются конфликты между разработчиками Trilogy Multiplayer

11🍌2👍1💋1🔥1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TrilogyDevelopment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 679,518 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Аризона РП ХОТ | Новости!
@arizonarphot · 77,249
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
Форумник GTA 🍁
@forumnick · 82,840
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trilogy Development | Новости” (@TrilogyDevelopment), 332 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrilogyDevelopment.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.