Channel
@TrissysEdge
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,700subscribers
+44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002348415136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TrissysEdge |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TrissysEdge |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 4,700 | +20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 4,680 | +19 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 4,661 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 4,660 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 4,649 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 4,647 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:59 | 4,648 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 4,640 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 4,645 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 4,646 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 4,648 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 4,655 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 4,656 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
612 reactions across 21 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 523 | 85.5% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 5.23% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 5.07% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.654% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.163% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.163% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.163% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 612 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Robinhood Eco Update $CASHCAT (100 mil) - listing makes the trade is different now, there’s no longer a main catalyst and you need to have a mid/longer time horizon. You have to believe in RH’s ability to convert mindshare and real users to their chain and crypto products. From history we can tell that all mentions are intentional from the team regarding Cashcat and it’s also safe to assume that hints for other coin…
❤7👍7
$FRONG (5 mil) - Uniswap native token launchpad. Creators can either launch instantly through a Uniswap v4 liquidity pool or use a roughly 4 hour Crowd Launch auction where buyers submit a budget and max price, reducing bot sniping and bundled first block buys. After launch, liquidity is permanently locked in Uniswap v4, trading fees automatically deepen that liquidity and the token is immediately tradable through Un…
❤9🤔3👍1
Every chain have been firing mid 8 fig runners this past week. Fomo is continually seeing mid 6 fig 24 hour PNL which is quite insane to look at considering where we are in the cycle. There’s two ways to look at this: #1: onchain is growing in participants and is going to catapult as the bull slowly comes back #2: most of the available capital left in crypto is washing around in the small onchain tokens as large …
❤31
There’s this stigma that you’re doing it wrong by spending your early 20’s grinding for money. Not in the sense that money is bad and you shouldn’t be doing it, but sacrificing majority or all of your social experiences/quality of life to purse it. As someone’s who’s 25 now and spent ages 19-24 more focused on self improvement and perfection in my crafts than 99.99% of society, I can whole heartedly say it was wort…
❤34
Forgot how important it is to take a step back when you feel yourself overtrading. Back in the beginning of June I was at a low point in terms of my discipline and approach to trading as a whole. Many leaks in the boat and simply didn’t have the hunger for multiple months to accumulate the screen time needed to perform with the best. Over the past month, did I reach the screen time required to have my pulse on the…
❤39👍1
Error regarding my thesis $FEFER. I had the impression that Stable was publicly positioned as Tethers chain when it’s only backed by Tether even though it’s technically “on the books”. The chain having a token made the trade feel less asymmetric as well as it puts a roof over its head in terms of comparisons etc. Now there’s pvp on the token. It’s still valued at 1 bil mcap and 4 bil FDV, although the dynamics of …
❤18🤝7💅1
$AI tapped 17 mil. The long xyz narrative has been digested very well and fits the RWA x Meme barbell perfectly. I don’t want to speculate on Vlad/RH interactions as it’s a horrible thesis to hold coins for, except this is the best coin/narrative for their chain I’ve seen so far. Long has equivalated for 87% of Robinhoods chain RWA volume, doing 48 mil in total. Hard to see the RH team not noticing that. No nativ…
❤12
Bought $FEFER on Stable’s (Tethers) new chain. The first meme on Stable and pushed by Paolo (CEO) multiple times and retweeted by Stable chain. https://x.com/Stable/status/2080166573340504403?s=20 Currently the main runner and would assume it to stay that way considering the CEO and Stable both tweeted it today. No infra yet, coins are less than 24 hours old, bridges are slow and failing. Txns are also quite slow …
👍11❤2
Utility coins been cooking on Robinhood. Few coins which are interesting/main narratives: $WOOD (30 mil): An agentic trading platform. Idea is to enable any agent to manage an onchain fund with vaults, governed strategies and verifiable track record. Marketing and branding is cool, they have the full suite of optics with the co founders having good comms, product is still in testnet though. $PRIZE has a fully worki…
❤26🙏3
Mid week sidequest. As I mentioned, I had the opportunity last week to help a friend who was early on building some cool tech on RH. For the past two years I’ve essentially been trading on the sidelines and writing content on narratives, tech and memes which I’ve found interesting or bought. Before that I was the CMO for one of the biggest launches of 2024 that did a 50x from public sale which inevitably blew up fo…
❤34
Right on queue.
❤11🔥7
Onchain reacting as expected the past 24 hours. Slow grind up on low volume and people positioning in the leaders again. I don’t have a great read on majors or macro since I’ve been spending all my time onchain. Only pillar I’m willing to sit on is the fact that MSTR and STRC isn’t an issue and fud related to has minimal impact on the short and medium term, if it was to have long term impact then the discussion wou…
❤26
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @TrissysEdge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trissy's Edge” (@TrissysEdge), 4,700 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrissysEdge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.