![Telegram profile photo for [ Tweet ]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/5d/5de175c307dcb7d40ab512d6de9c9ed57ec0d6084ac5978be9bb8b0570aed305.jpg)
Channel
@Twitte_0w
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
263subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266994051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Twitte_0w |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Twitte_0w |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 263 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 263 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 444 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از نگاه زیستشناسی تکاملی، مغز ما برای «بقا و تولیدمثل» طراحی شده، نه «حقطلبی و شرافت». رفتارهایی مثل مصلحتاندیشی، رنگ عوض کردن و همرنگ جماعت شدن، خطر مرگ و انزوا را کم میکنند. اما شریف بودن یعنی هزینه دادن، بدون اینکه سود مادی ملموسی گیرت بیاید؛ یعنی به خطر انداختن ثروت، امنیت یا قدرت، آن هم فقط برای حفظ یک مفهوم انتزاعی مثل حقیقت یا عدالت. در حسابوکتابِ تکامل، شرافت نوعی «اشتباه محاسباتی در بقا»ست! برای همین هم…
یکی از چیزایی که حسابی نگاهم رو به زندگی عوض کرد، مفهوم «هزینه فرصته». یعنی هر انتخابی که میکنی، فقط هزینهش همون چیزی نیست که میدی. هزینه اصلیش اون چیزیه که از دست میدی؛ بهترین گزینهای که میتونستی بهجاش انتخاب کنی ولی نکردی. وقتی سه ساعت تو اینستاگرام میچرخی، هزینه فرصتش فقط اون سه ساعت نیست. هزینه فرصتش میتونه کتابی باشه که نخوندی، ورزشی که نکردی، یا حرفی که میتونستی با کسی که برات مهمه بزنی. وقتی تو …
❤1
شاید لازم باشه یادآوری کنم که هیچچیز، به اندازهی پیشرفت شما دهن آدمهایی رو سرویس نمیکنه که یه روزی نادیدهتون گرفتن. پس کار کنید، پسانداز کنید، خوب بپوشید، سالم بخورید، درس بخونید، ورزش کنید، و به خودتون برسید. پس کار کنید حال کنید، حال کنید کار کنید. |مهدی|
❤1
«اگر هر چیزی ارائه کردید کافی نبود؛ نبودتان را ارائه کنید.» |raamsar|
همه تقصیرها را به دوش بکش، خودت را مقصر مطلق اعلام کن و بعد از صحنه حذف شو. گویی غیبتت تنها راه جبران بودنت هست. |هلیا|
Be with someone who you don’t have to hide anything. با کسی باش که لازم نباشه چیزی رو ازش پنهون کنی.
هر وقت دنیا براتون خیلی سخت و جدی شد به این بیت خیام فکر کنید ««فردا که از این دیر کهن درگذریم با هفت هزارسالگان سر به سریم»» iAm ashkán
میانهی راه ایستاد و از خودش پرسید: یعنی تمام زندگی همین است؟ «همین تحمل کردنها، صبر کردنها و دوام آوردنهای اجباری؟» …
جان گاتمن میگه: "یا برای شریک عاطفیتون کاری رو که گفتید انجام بدید، یا اصلا حرفش رو نزنید! اینکه میخواستم واسهات گل بگیرم! میخواستم بیام بریم بیرون! میخواستم واسه تولدت فلان کنم! بیشتر از این که شما رو جذاب و قوی نشون بده، حرفهاتون رو بی اعتبار و خودتون رو غیرِ قابلِ اتکا نشون میده! پس یا انجامش بده، یا حرفش رو نزن...!
در خود بطلب هر آنچه خواهى كه تویی مولانا
درس امشب: نگید من محبتم رو زبونم نیست تو رفتارمه! اگر بلد نیستید یاد بگیرید! آدمیزاد «باید» بشنوه که دوست داشتنیه، زیباست و عزیزه...! |mg_bartender|
عمل کردن بهتر از حرف زدنه. تنهایی بهتر از رابطه اشتباهه. سکوت بهتر از بحث بیفایدهست. و تمرکز روی خودت بهتر از مقایسهست.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Twitte_0w. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[ Tweet ]” (@Twitte_0w), 263 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Twitte_0w.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.