Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100,749–101,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 15:41
101,056
-97
15 Sept 2026, 10:42
101,153
-73
13 Sept 2026, 20:57
101,226
-17
12 Sept 2026, 05:36
101,243
+331
10 Sept 2026, 00:01
100,912
+67
6 Sept 2026, 16:57
100,845
+14
2 Sept 2026, 18:16
100,831
+9
1 Sept 2026, 16:45
100,822
-5
31 Aug 2026, 17:04
100,827
-13
30 Aug 2026, 18:38
100,840
-39
29 Aug 2026, 20:12
100,879
+14
28 Aug 2026, 19:12
100,865
+28
27 Aug 2026, 18:17
100,837
-39
26 Aug 2026, 14:56
100,876
-28
25 Aug 2026, 16:53
100,904
-38
24 Aug 2026, 18:08
100,942
-173
22 Aug 2026, 23:23
101,115
-78
21 Aug 2026, 11:06
101,193
-26
20 Aug 2026, 12:13
101,219
+42
19 Aug 2026, 09:03
101,177
first reading
Engagement
879 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.01%
avg views ÷ 101,056 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,080
556 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
556
of 879 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 554 of 556 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
879 (5 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
3,379,609
Reactions total
35,512
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 21:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,100
Videos
≈12,100
Links
≈10,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 02m
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 251 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
56,509 reactions across 861 posts, in 70 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
11,172
19.8%
❤
9,186
16.3%
👍
4,343
7.69%
🤬
3,434
6.08%
🤣
3,115
5.51%
💩
2,771
4.90%
😢
2,713
4.80%
🔥
2,576
4.56%
😁
2,393
4.23%
🤯
2,227
3.94%
custom 5206406068275545915
1,577
2.79%
😨
1,300
2.30%
🤮
1,063
1.88%
👎
972
1.72%
🖕
821
1.45%
🙏
616
1.09%
❤🔥
596
1.05%
👏
574
1.02%
🕊
565
1%
💔
422
0.747%
50 further kinds
4,073
7.21%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 876 of the 879 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,871 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 879 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 879 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tyumen72chs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 879 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
14.7%
129 of 879 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
129
posts carrying an erid · 88 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
6,290
over 129 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,490
over 750 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxAkioC
20
5 August 2026
31 August 2026
2Vtzqwwz1bh
6
19 August 2026
30 August 2026
2Vtzqws6b31
4
4 September 2026
17 September 2026
2Vtzqv76Efm
3
1 September 2026
3 September 2026
2VtzqvEWB5V
3
2 September 2026
6 September 2026
2VtzqwRsnxA
3
10 August 2026
17 August 2026
2VtzqxV2mnz
3
8 August 2026
17 August 2026
2VtzqujwEsm
2
2 September 2026
16 September 2026
2Vtzqw3TEYT
2
2 September 2026
16 September 2026
2VtzqwTNe9y
2
13 August 2026
28 August 2026
2VtzqwXnQqZ
2
3 September 2026
16 September 2026
2VtzqxaZswq
2
29 August 2026
31 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 76 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 879 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В Тюменской области подошли к концу выборы, длившиеся три дня. Участки для голосования прекратили работу в 20:00.
Сейчас избирательная комиссия приступит к подсчету голосов. Ожидается, что предварительные итоги объявят уже завтра.
По информации, размещенной на сайте областного избиркома, явка на выборы депутатов регионального парламента в Тюменской области (с учетом автономных округов) к 18:00 достигла 64,37%. На в…
Ищете, где аккуратно оформить брови в Тюмени?
Хотите изменить форму или подобрать подходящее окрашивание?
Давно хотели попробовать ламинирование бровей или ресниц? ✨
| БРОВИ | РЕСНИЦЫ | ТЮМЕНЬ‼️ |
Анна — специалист по оформлению бровей и ресниц, имею свидетельство о профессии бровиста.
Предлагаю вам следующие услуги:
• коррекция и оформление бровей
• окрашивание бровей
• коррекция + окрашивание
• ламинирование бр…
В областном центре планируется модернизация системы фотовидеофиксации.
Камеры, установленные в Тюмени и на объездных дорогах, будут фиксировать расширенный перечень нарушений ПДД: движение по обочине, несоблюдение требований к расположению транспортных средств на проезжей части, а также нарушения правил маневрирования (разворотов и поворотов).
Мы в Макс| Мы во ВКонтакте
😱 Ядовитые змеи залезают на тюменские дачи
Гадюка длиной почти в метр притаилась прямо в траве — и хозяйка едва не наткнулась на нее во время косьбы. Хорошо, что рядом оказался работник, который как в боевике спокойно заманил змею в бутылку.
Даже осенью, когда змеи кажутся сонными и медлительными, они остаются опасными и могут укусить.
Найденную гадюку планируют выпустить в лесу — подальше от людей.
Нашгород ру
…
Медведь растерзал двух мужчин в Сибири
Один из них ушёл в лес искать пропавшую корову, второй отправился на поиски односельчанина
18 сентября 44-летний работник фермы ушёл в лес возле деревни Север (Томская область) и не вернулся. На следующий день искать его отправился 46-летний местный житель.
Сегодня тела обоих мужчин нашли в лесу. Неподалёку находился агрессивный медведь — хищника застрелили.
Мы в Макс| Мы во…
Шестеро осужденных на пожизненный срок в ЯНАО могут получить работу швей.
Как сообщил уполномоченный по правам человека Андрей Нестерук, в ИК-18 рассматривают такую возможность для тех, кто должен возмещать ущерб.
Омбудсмен добавил, что вопрос расширения занятости в учреждениях округа продолжат обсуждать с УФСИН, обеспечивая безопасность и соблюдая закон.
Мы в Макс| Мы во ВКонтакте
В России предложили ввести водительские удостоверения для курьеров на электровелосипедах.
Глава СПЧ Валерий Фадеев считает, что транспорт курьеров нужно приравнять к мопедам. Тогда электровелосипеды получат номерные знаки, а нарушения курьеров на СИМ смогут фиксировать дорожные камеры.
💬 «Нарушил правила, проехал на красный свет — сначала штраф, а второй раз проехал на красный — лишение прав. Без прав он уже не смо…
24 года назад (20 сентября 2002 года) в Кармадонском ущелье сошел ледник Колка. Более сотни человек до сих пор считаются без вести пропавшими, хотя в их трагической участи почти никто не сомневается.
Среди них – Сергей Сергеевич Бодров.
Мы помним тебя Брат
Мы в Макс| Мы во ВКонтакте
Вдоль шумозащитного экрана у дороги обнаружены десятки погибших птиц настоящее птичье кладбище.
Судя по тому, как расположены тела, одна из вероятных причин столкновения с самим экраном: прозрачная или плохо различимая преграда для птицы может оказаться смертельной.
Но это вопрос уже не к птицам.
Если одна и та же конструкция раз за разом собирает под собой мёртвых пернатых, может быть, кто-нибудь когда-нибудь взг…
💔88😢41🤬10🤯9❤3🤡3🤣3💊2
Showing the 12 most recent of 879 posts we hold for @Tyumen72chs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Tyumen72chs named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@goldbricks72 named in 1 post, 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Тюмень ЧП @tumen_chp · 59,825 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 August 2026
Тюмень с огоньком @tumenjtop · 48,857 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Новости Тюмени и Области @smi_tyumen · 53,844 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 24 August 2026
Новости Тюмени | 72.RU @news_72ru · 99,441 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
ТЮМЕНЬ СЕГОДНЯ @tyumen2 · 77,576 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
Тюмень №1 @tyumen1 · 28,640 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
Подслушано Тюмень @moy_tumen · 30,241 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
Тюмень | Новости | Интересное @tumen_tut · 23,803 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
Тюмень Live @today_tyumen · 48,632 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
Тюмень Вакансии @rabota_tyument · 50,693 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
Тюменская область.рф @my_tyumen · 33,046 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
Тюмень * Новости * Важное @Tyumen_vajnoe · 25,191 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧС Тюмень” (@Tyumen72chs), 101,056 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tyumen72chs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.