Unsure if I should bother posting my latest articles from UFOUAP.com here or not. I will gauge interest by the level of engagement on this post! So engage away...and I will decide. Engagements now turned on. Oops.
👍7👏1

Channel
@UFOUAP
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
183subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001263451259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UFOUAP |
| Created | 8 June 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UFOUAP |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 183 | +1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 182 | +2 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 180 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 181 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 182 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 181 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 182 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 183 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 183 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 8 June 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 70.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2019 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Unsure if I should bother posting my latest articles from UFOUAP.com here or not. I will gauge interest by the level of engagement on this post! So engage away...and I will decide. Engagements now turned on. Oops.
👍7👏1
AARO Officials Keep Saying More After They Leave Former acting AARO director Tim Phillips now describes objects in space and impossible maneuvers – things he never said while in the chair. He's not the first. The pattern raises a simple question: what are officials allowed to say while they're still on the job? https://www.ufouap.com/articles/aaro-officials-say-more-after-leaving/ 🛸
Breaking UFO / UAP news in real time. Researched articles from UFO history. Investigative Series. UFOUAP.com
If authentic, easily the best orb UFO footage ever filmed. Spotted by hikers on Cumbral volcano, Colombia 🇨🇴 Thank you to @AgndaAlien
https://nypost.com/2022/10/28/filmmaker-claims-video-exists-of-captured-alien-creature-from-brazil-ufo-incident/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/20199827/us-warship-enormous-ufo-black-triangle-sea/
US Department of Defense opens new office about "unidentified anomalous phenomena across space, air, and maritime domains." https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3100053/dod-announces-the-establishment-of-the-all-domain-anomaly-resolution-office/
❤1
Rep. Tim Burchett - a long term advocate for disclosure - told The Sun Online he has been informed by reliable sources that "material" has been recovered from the objects or craft that have been reported in skies over the US. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/18594935/us-wreckage-ufos-truth-congressman/
UFO sleuths make extraordinary discoveries https://thehill.com/opinion/3488406-ufo-sleuths-make-extraordinary-discoveries-congress-should-take-note/
BREAKING UFO NEWS Main stream media coverage of UFO UAP sightings by experienced pilots continues to increase. THE WEEK: Taking UFOs seriously. Why the Pentagon is urging pilots to report their close and counters. June 14 2019 edition. Connect with UFO UAP | Post disclosure on your favorite platforms. Twitter: http://twitter.com/UFOUAP Telegram: https://t.me/UFOUAP LBRY: https://open.lbry.com/@UFOUAP Web & Newslet…
Photo, posted without a caption
This is where we are so far… anything missing? Twitter: http://twitter.com/UFOUAP Telegram: https://t.me/UFOUAP LBRY: https://open.lbry.com/@UFOUAP Web & Newsletter: https://UFOUAP.com YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9c33udUev4WxwS38LgJ6wA/ Facebook: http://fb.com/UFOUAP
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @UFOUAP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UFO UAP - Post disclosure” (@UFOUAP), 183 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UFOUAP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.