https://t.me/ShatoshiCoin
🤔3🥰1

Channel
@UNiVERSALCRYPTOSIGNALSOCALL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
50subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002371977349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UNiVERSALCRYPTOSIGNALSOCALL |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UNiVERSALCRYPTOSIGNALSOCALL |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 50 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 51 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
403 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 17.1% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 13.2% | |
| 🥰 | 45 | 11.2% | |
| 💯 | 37 | 9.18% | |
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 7.20% | |
| 🤩 | 29 | 7.20% | |
| 🎉 | 28 | 6.95% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 6.70% | |
| 😍 | 26 | 6.45% | |
| 🐳 | 18 | 4.47% | |
| 🤡 | 14 | 3.47% | |
| 🏆 | 13 | 3.23% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 2.98% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.744% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/ShatoshiCoin
🤔3🥰1
中国密码鲸公司🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖 pinned «https://x.com/Happy21333Happy»
https://x.com/Happy21333Happy
❤2👍1
中国密码鲸公司🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖 pinned a photo
把它发布在我们的官方X页面上。 迷惑群众。 试着发财或被转发。 但是等等——它变得更假了。 每周,最流行、最荒谬和最具娱乐性的假新闻将通过AirDrop获得奖励。 #benzcoin — 头条新闻是假的,但奖励是真实的。 CA GCyrxfsENKBXdERFa8WQ97pkZQ8UnpLVpdqbAxhSpump 电报:https://t.me/+QiN4 网站:(假新闻) 介绍假新闻——几乎太真实的模因硬币。这枚硬币助长了互联网上最疯狂的头条新闻和最荒谬的阴谋。 但是等等——它变得更假了。 每周,最流行、最荒谬和最具娱乐性的假新闻将通过AirDrop获得奖励。 # — 头条新闻是假的,但奖励是真实的。 Twitter: https://x.com/splencegtr?s=21 CA:GCyrxfsENKBXdERFa8WQ97pkZQ8UnpLVpdqbAxhSpump TELIGRAM : ht…
❤16🔥14🏆9🐳9🙏8🤡7
中国密码鲸公司🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖 pinned a photo
Moon Moon ($MOON) 预售 Fairlaunch 现已上线! 由一位拥有权威数据且已曝光人肉搜索的开发者支持✅ 已通过审计 + KYC 验证🔒 Pinksale 热门榜单第一名📈 出自 $SOLAMA 背后的开发者:这个梗的爆款,曾实现 10 万倍增长,市值突破 1.5 亿美元! 下一个重磅利器,不容错过!🌕🐺 👉 预售链接:https://www.pinksale.finance/solana/launchpad/9Q35HLJ3M3c1tNcUV8fEGKNokFS24gHcgpsrUH58fvut Raydium 将于 9 月 15 日星期一下午 2 点(UTC)上线,敬请提前参与!预售结束日期:2025年9月14日 19:00 UTC 网站:https://moonmoontoken.com Telegram:https://t.me/MoonMoonToken X(Twitter):https…
❤16🔥13🐳9🤡7🏆4🙏4
https://t.me/+Ouv3I_NXEBo0M2E1
Hey
$MOONCAT 氛围
❤2
社区军队中的坚强品格至关重要 巨魔十亿美元 $TROLL
❤2
中国密码鲸公司🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UNiVERSALCRYPTOSIGNALSOCALL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@UNiVERSALCRYPTOSIGNALSOCALL named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中国密码鲸公司🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖” (@UNiVERSALCRYPTOSIGNALSOCALL), 50 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UNiVERSALCRYPTOSIGNALSOCALL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.