Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UPCX Channel

Channel

UPCX Channel

@UPCXchannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,829subscribers

-81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001966010826
TypeChannel
Username@UPCXchannel
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UPCXchannel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8291,9101,869.57 August 2026 — 1,910 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,885 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,874 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,867 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,860 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,859 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,851 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,846 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,842 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,835 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,832 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,829 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,817–1,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:391,829-3
13 Sept 2026, 20:581,832-3
10 Sept 2026, 13:411,835-7
5 Sept 2026, 11:591,842-4
1 Sept 2026, 16:041,846-5
29 Aug 2026, 18:441,851-8
27 Aug 2026, 01:141,859-1
24 Aug 2026, 01:241,860-7
20 Aug 2026, 14:031,867-7
17 Aug 2026, 13:391,874-11
13 Aug 2026, 23:271,885-13
10 Aug 2026, 10:111,898-11
7 Aug 2026, 17:031,909-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:471,910first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1470.0%
🔥210.0%
🤔210.0%
👏15.00%
😁15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC12 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔥 Imagine paying for your morning coffee, shopping online, and sending money overseas—all from one seamless payment experience. #UPCX is building a digital payment ecosystem designed to make everyday transactions simpler, faster, and more connected. The future of payments isn't about doing more⚡️ It's about making every #payment feel effortless. 🔗 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2085701861550514304

25 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC90 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎉 From WebX 2026 Highlights! UPCX had an amazing time at WebX 2026, discussing the future of blockchain and digital payments with industry leaders and the community. Thank you again to everyone who connected with us. Exciting things are ahead! 🚀 🔗 Official Tweet: https://x.com/i/status/2080830835880595541

7🔥2👏1

15 Jul 2026, 03:39 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🙏 Thank you all for the two days of WebX2026! At the UPCX booth, we were visited by many of you each day, and the original goods ran out of distribution in about an hour after opening, receiving an overwhelmingly positive response beyond our expectations 🔥 At the booth, under the theme of Beyond Payments, we introduced use cases connected not only to payments but also to Onchain Finance and next-generation financia

3

23 Apr 2026, 15:41 UTC226 viewsread 7 August 2026

📈 The cross-border payments market is heading toward $290 trillion by 2030 🌍 ⏱ Blockchain settles in minutes. Traditional rails take days. 💸 The cost difference? Up to 7% saved. The math isn’t complicated. The infrastructure just needs to be ready when the volume arrives🚀 ⚙️ Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2045729152565682619

19 Apr 2026, 08:01 UTC505 viewsread 7 August 2026

Most people think of payments as sending money from A to B 💸➡️💸. UPCX thinks further — scheduled payments, recurring payments, escrow, multi-sig, offline capability, NFC tap, Named Accounts ✨ Payments built for how life actually works, not just how banks want it to work 💡 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2045370495013401010

18 Apr 2026, 16:57 UTC231 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😁 South Korea's Toss — used by 30 million people, that's 60% of the country's population — is building its own L1 blockchain and filed 24 stablecoin trademarks ✅ When the world's most advanced mobile-first financial apps start building on-chain, the mass adoption conversation becomes real ⚡️ 🔗 https://t.co/ijzkK67oJZ 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2045000564681908524

14 Apr 2026, 22:41 UTC321 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎙️ CMO CHAT: AI + Web3 — Real Infrastructure or Just Marketing Noise ❓ AI is everywhere. But is it actually being built into Web3, or is it just a talking point? Join us this Thursday as we cut through the hype, explore where AI and Web3 are genuinely converging, and what that means for the road ahead. 🗓 16 April 2026 🔜 1PM UTC 🔗https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1lKQRvjWqLZGE?s=20 Don't miss it — mark your calendar 🔥 💬

12 Apr 2026, 15:43 UTC132 viewsread 7 August 2026

⭐️ Imagine your wallet address being @yourshop instead of 0x4f3a...d82c~ 💡 UPCX Named Accounts make that real - readable, tradeable, memorable on-chain identities. 🚀 The biggest barrier to Web3 payments isn't speed or cost. It's the moment someone has to copy-paste a 42-character string and hope they got it right. 🔗 Simplicity is the future of adoption. 🔥 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2042780931619008777

11 Apr 2026, 19:29 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💵 Ripple + Convera just launched a stablecoin sandwich model 🥪 Dollars in, stablecoin in the middle 😀, local currency is out.. 140 currencies. 200 countries. near-instant settlement New rules for real-time payments kick in globally this April 2026 🗓 The question isn't whether this shift is happening 🤔 it's who built the infrastructure for it first. 🔗 Link: https://t.co/XSsPbclA9y 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/s

5 Apr 2026, 14:16 UTC376 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Web3 and crypto raised 💰 $9.27 billion across 255 deals in Q1 2026 alone. March delivered $6.04B💲nearly 6× February's pace payments infrastructure captured $2.8B of that the money knows where the opportunity is 🎯 🔗 https://cryip.co/web3-and-crypto-fundraising-report-for-q1-2026/ 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2040750056316264527

29 Mar 2026, 13:49 UTC177 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ NTT. Japan's largest telecom. 100 million+ subscribers. They don't sign MOUs for fun When enterprise players at that scale start positioning in Web3 payments, it's worth paying attention to why. 🔗 https://t.co/rjiNb6hdfc 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2037465919245418632

2

26 Mar 2026, 05:17 UTC145 viewsread 7 August 2026

👉 Here's something worth thinking about — most Web3 startups don't fail because of bad code they fail because payment infrastructure breaks the moment real users show up 38% of people who try to buy crypto with a card hit a wall and leave. they don't come back. UX isn't separate from infrastructure. it IS infrastructure 🔥 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/Upcxofficial/status/2037092383343464873

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @UPCXchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Velo News & Updates
@veloupdates · 156,600
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UPCX Channel” (@UPCXchannel), 1,829 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPCXchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.