Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UPSC EPFO APFC 2027

Channel

UPSC EPFO APFC 2027

@UPSC_EPFO_APFC_2027

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

45,938subscribers

+4,379 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001761658145
TypeChannel
Username@UPSC_EPFO_APFC_2027
DescriptionAdmin : @Vip_2468 #UPSC #IAS #IPS #PRELIMS #CURRENTAFFAIRS ▪️Daily Current Affairs ▪️Gk complete Notes 👉 Get Topicwise Chapterwise PDF, E-Notes, Quizzes etc.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UPSC_EPFO_APFC_2027

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@UPSC_EPFO_APFC_2027 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@UPSC_CDS_NDA_CAPF_AC
held 7 August 20267 August 2026

Growth

41,49645,93843,7177 August 2026 — 41,559 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,559 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,521 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,496 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,634 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,583 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,874 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,786 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,895 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41,791 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,733 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,661 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,610 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,650 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,818 subscribers22 August 2026 — 41,956 subscribers24 August 2026 — 42,452 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,456 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,535 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,547 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,619 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,685 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,862 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,953 subscribers1 September 2026 — 43,073 subscribers2 September 2026 — 43,591 subscribers3 September 2026 — 43,853 subscribers4 September 2026 — 44,124 subscribers7 September 2026 — 44,293 subscribers10 September 2026 — 44,785 subscribers12 September 2026 — 45,347 subscribers14 September 2026 — 45,617 subscribers15 September 2026 — 45,720 subscribers18 September 2026 — 45,938 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 41 days, net +4,379. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,830–46,604 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:3845,938+218
15 Sept 2026, 23:5945,720+103
14 Sept 2026, 04:4045,617+270
12 Sept 2026, 12:4045,347+562
10 Sept 2026, 09:1944,785+492
7 Sept 2026, 02:5744,293+169
4 Sept 2026, 11:3644,124+271
3 Sept 2026, 01:4543,853+262
2 Sept 2026, 01:2643,591+518
1 Sept 2026, 01:4543,073+120
31 Aug 2026, 04:3542,953+91
30 Aug 2026, 03:4842,862+177
29 Aug 2026, 00:5942,685+66
28 Aug 2026, 02:2642,619+72
27 Aug 2026, 02:0442,547+12
26 Aug 2026, 01:4742,535+79
25 Aug 2026, 05:0242,456+4
24 Aug 2026, 04:0442,452+496
22 Aug 2026, 09:5541,956+138
21 Aug 2026, 00:4341,818first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.97%
avg views ÷ 45,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,120
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.181%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held50 (10 October 202518 September 2026)
Views total123,621
Reactions total213
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
166
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

460 reactions across 44 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42191.5%
👍91.96%
💋61.30%
👎51.09%
🔥30.652%
🕊20.435%
😁20.435%
🤡20.435%
🥴20.435%
❤‍🔥10.217%
🌚10.217%
🎉10.217%
👌10.217%
💩10.217%
🗿10.217%
😨10.217%
🥰10.217%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 460 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 04:38 UTC859 views3 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

🚨 UPSC EPFO APFC 2026 — TEST SERIES APFC PRAYAAS 2026 by The Civil Studies 🔥 26 TESTS • 13 Sectional • 3 Combined • 10 Full-Length ✅ Numerical + Factual Questions ✅ Case Study + Statement-Based Questions ✅ UPSC-Style Application & Elimination ✅ Detailed Solutions ✅ test discussion 💰 ₹999/- for First 50 Students Schedule 🎯 TAKE THE DEMO TEST ON OUR APP For application https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?

3

16 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,740 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Poll

In the year 1911, who among the following formed the social service league in Bombay ? [EPFO 2021]

  1. (a) G K Gokhale38%
  2. (b) S A Dange22%
  3. (c) N M Joshi34%
  4. (d) M R Jaykar6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

16 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,680 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Poll

Who among the following did not represent the militant nationalist school of thought in India ? [EPFO 2021]

  1. (a) Ashwini Kumar Dutt10%
  2. (b) Vishnushastri Chiplunkar39%
  3. (c) Krishna Kumar mitra30%
  4. (d) Lala Lajpat Rai21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1😨1

16 Sept 2026, 07:30 UTC≈2,020 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

🚨 UPSC EPFO APFC 2026 — TEST SERIES APFC PRAYAAS 2026 by The Civil Studies 🔥 26 TESTS • 13 Sectional • 3 Combined • 10 Full-Length ✅ Numerical + Factual Questions ✅ Case Study + Statement-Based Questions ✅ UPSC-Style Application & Elimination ✅ Detailed Solutions ✅ test discussion 💰 ₹999/- for First 50 Students Schedule 🎯 TAKE THE DEMO TEST ON OUR APP For application https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?

2

15 Sept 2026, 13:45 UTC≈2,310 views3 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

🚨 APFC paryaas 60 — STARTING 25 SEPTEMBER 🚨 60 DAYS • 60 QUESTIONS DAILY 🎯 📚 30 APFC Subject Questions 🧮 30 Maths + Reasoning + English Questions 🎯 3,600 Questions in 60 Days 💰 LAUNCH OFFER — ₹499/- ⚡ FIRST 50 STUDENTS ONLY 📲 Join through The Civil Studies App Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ingenium.tca2048⁠� Laptop / Tablet / iOS: https://thecivilstudies.ingeniumedu.com/⁠� 📎 Complete 60

3

15 Sept 2026, 07:37 UTC≈2,650 views4 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

🚨 MISSION APFC 60 — STARTING 25 SEPTEMBER 🚨 60 DAYS • 60 QUESTIONS DAILY 🎯 📚 30 APFC Subject Questions 🧮 30 Maths + Reasoning + English Questions 🎯 3,600 Questions in 60 Days 💰 LAUNCH OFFER — ₹499/- ⚡ FIRST 50 STUDENTS ONLY 📲 Join through The Civil Studies App Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ingenium.tca2048⁠� Laptop / Tablet / iOS: https://thecivilstudies.ingeniumedu.com/⁠� 📎 Complete 60-

3🥰1

14 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC≈3,020 views6 reactionsread 18 September 2026

🔴 LAST DATE TODAY — 14 SEP 🏛 UPSC EPFO APFC — 80 Posts

6

11 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈4,990 views15 reactionsread 18 September 2026

🔥 APFC Exam application date has been extended.🔥 Last date - 14th Sept! Till 06:00 🕕 PM

15

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @UPSC_EPFO_APFC_2027. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz502 voters

In the year 1911, who among the following formed the social service league in Bombay ? [EPFO 2021]

  1. (a) G K Gokhale38%
  2. (b) S A Dange22%
  3. (c) N M Joshi34%
  4. (d) M R Jaykar6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz430 voters

Who among the following did not represent the militant nationalist school of thought in India ? [EPFO 2021]

  1. (a) Ashwini Kumar Dutt10%
  2. (b) Vishnushastri Chiplunkar39%
  3. (c) Krishna Kumar mitra30%
  4. (d) Lala Lajpat Rai21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Sept 2026, 10:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz899 voters

Who among the following was not part of the group of 'no-changers' in the Congress party ? [EPFO 2021]

  1. (a) Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel27%
  2. (b) Dr Ansari30%
  3. (c) Babu Rajendra Prasad21%
  4. (d) Motilal Nehru23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Sept 2026, 10:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz896 voters

In the year 1911, who among the following formed the social service league in Bombay ? [EPFO 2021]

  1. (a) G K Gokhale41%
  2. (b) S A Dange21%
  3. (c) N M Joshi32%
  4. (d) M R Jaykar6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 May 2026, 17:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,910 voters approx.

भारतीय संविधान ने .............. की स्थापना की है। The Indian constitution has established ..............

  1. स्वतंत्र न्यायपालिका प्रणाली /independent judicial system75%
  2. आंशिक न्यायपालिका प्रणाली /partial Judicial system9%
  3. दोहरी न्यायपालिका प्रणाली/dual judicial system13%
  4. बहुल न्यायपालिका प्रणाली/plural judicial system2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 May 2026, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,150 voters approx.

भारतीय संविधान में पहली संशोधन कब किया गया था? When was the first amendment made in the Indian constitution?

  1. 19538%
  2. 195166%
  3. 195215%
  4. 194910%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 18 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UPSC EPFO APFC 2027” (@UPSC_EPFO_APFC_2027), 45,938 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSC_EPFO_APFC_2027.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.