Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mudit F – Essay

Channel

Mudit F – Essay

@UPSCwithMuditF

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,177subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003869466903
TypeChannel
Username@UPSCwithMuditF
DescriptionAIR 353, UPSC CSE-2025 / Essay 150, 139 / Twitter: @muditfx
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 21 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/UPSCwithMuditF

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:222,177first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
118.3%
avg views ÷ 2,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,580
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.617%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 202617 September 2026)
Views total25,750
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

436 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30570.0%
🔥5111.7%
👍245.50%
👏122.75%
💯122.75%
👌112.52%
😱112.52%
🤩51.15%
😢40.917%
10.229%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 436 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC≈2,920 views30 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

281👍1

13 Sept 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,620 views19 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Bertrand Russell, on the importance of having hobbies

💯127

10 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,600 views9 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @Rangamanju

Now onto what i did specifically in this attempt that was missing in my previous attempts. I don't claim any of them necessarily contributed to the score, but perhaps there was a method in the madness 1) Rewrite the essay statement in black, boxing it 2) Start the essay with a poem, end with a poem- both generated on the spot at the time of brainstorming 3) Poem written in black to contrast with the writing in blue

9

8 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,940 views13 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Each point represents a para. Disclaimer: Brainstorming in exam-conditions is way more challenging. Wouldn't have come up with all of these points. This is also not an exhaustive list of dimensions one could think of on the topic. Just an idea of how one can structure.

13

8 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈4,120 views13 reactionsread 19 September 2026

SYNTHESIS 1. A leader should LISTEN, not FOLLOW (utility in both) – How to ensure that? – 2, 3 ways a. Institutionalise feedback (social audits, grievance redressal mechanisms) b. Encourage dissent c. Build institutions/systems stronger than personalities CONCLUSION Gandhi was able to succesfully traverse the tight-rope delicately. Some leaders aren’t capable enough to do that. And that exactly is

13

8 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈3,960 views16 reactionsread 19 September 2026

A good leader is one who follows the followers. INTRO Gandhi – followed the followers (Concerns of the masses linked to INM; loincloth, khadi, salt); BUT also did the opposite – defied the followers (Chauri Chaura) – what’s correct? OR People of Ayodhya questioning Maa Sita’s chastity – deliberating Lord Rama’s decision of listening to the followers. THESIS Why it may be the sign of a good leader? 1. Followers

16

8 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 19 September 2026

Brainstormed a quote I found interesting from this year's Essay paper:

27 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC≈2,760 views12 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

UPSC CSE PYQs from back in the day (CSE-1947-1955), have at it

😱111

26 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,630 views27 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

22🔥5

21 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈3,680 views24 reactionsread 19 September 2026

Doubter is a true man of science (2024) "A well educated mind will have more questions than answers" Similar theme - Curiosity, Skepticism

👍159

21 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC≈3,430 views7 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Shared by Arpit Rituraj (AIR 875, 2025) Similar theme repeated: “Shelving hard decisions is the least ethical course”

🤩52

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UPSCwithMuditF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mudit F – Essay” (@UPSCwithMuditF), 2,177 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSCwithMuditF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.