International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net +507. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,663–8,347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 18:28
8,268
+91
4 Nov 2026, 23:25
8,177
+250
2 Nov 2026, 06:36
7,927
+26
30 Oct 2026, 07:19
7,901
+23
26 Oct 2026, 22:06
7,878
+13
23 Oct 2026, 21:35
7,865
+47
20 Oct 2026, 17:06
7,818
+24
17 Oct 2026, 08:26
7,794
+17
14 Oct 2026, 09:38
7,777
+24
10 Oct 2026, 13:37
7,753
+9
4 Oct 2026, 19:40
7,744
-7
25 Sept 2026, 13:01
7,751
+3
17 Sept 2026, 04:18
7,748
+5
13 Sept 2026, 09:15
7,743
-2
9 Sept 2026, 10:00
7,745
-8
3 Sept 2026, 22:21
7,753
+9
31 Aug 2026, 18:34
7,744
-2
28 Aug 2026, 18:48
7,746
+1
25 Aug 2026, 16:42
7,745
+2
22 Aug 2026, 12:17
7,743
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
60.6%
avg views ÷ 8,268 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,010
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
44 (23 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
140,320
Reactions total
4,212
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 00:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
859
Videos
536
Links
598
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
13m 09s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,784 reactions across 44 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
982
17.0%
❤
937
16.2%
👍
746
12.9%
🔥
520
8.99%
😁
437
7.56%
🤬
389
6.73%
🤔
375
6.48%
💊
362
6.26%
👏
160
2.77%
🤣
133
2.30%
❤🔥
110
1.90%
🥴
106
1.83%
🎉
82
1.42%
🙈
65
1.12%
🤯
61
1.05%
🤪
51
0.882%
👻
35
0.605%
👀
34
0.588%
🍾
27
0.467%
🙊
27
0.467%
27 further kinds
145
2.51%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,784 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 44 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @USAelections24. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (32.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Трамп предлагает Дане Уайту возглавить пресс-службу? Может сразу с Хабибом?
Президент США написал (в шутку?), что задача: защищать администрацию от «безумных левых». Заканчивается публикация просьбой: «Дана, пожалуйста, согласись!» Трамп очень любит бои UFC (не даром же проводил бой на лужайке Белого дома), а Дана Уайт как глава Ultimate Fighting Championship давно поддерживает президента. И не случайно Кирилл Дмитр…
Назначение Стивена Миллера = объявление политической войны. Трамп назначил его новым главой аппарата Белого дома, он сменит Сьюзи Уайлс 9 ноября.
Миллер — один из самых преданных людей Трампа с 2016 г., но главное, что Миллер не просто исполнитель президентской воли, он один из главных авторов.
Именно Миллер архитектор массовых депортаций, он требовал от иммиграционной службы ICE не менее 3 000 арестов в день. Это …
Во-первых, это красиво! Избранный губернатором Айовы демократ Роб Сэнд в студенческие годы работал моделью, участвуя в показах Prada, Galliano, Number (N)ine в Милане и Париже. Он учился на политолога в Брауновском университете, а подиум помогал оплачивать образование.
Потом он получил юридическое образование, стал прокурором, занимался коррупционерами обеих партий и помог раскрыть крупнейшую в истории США схему мах…
Трамп встретился с Дмитриевым и пообещал «большую красивую сделку» для всей Европы
Журналистка: Вы лично встречались с посланником президента Путина, который находился в Белом Доме?
Трамп: Да.
Журналистка: О чём вы беседовали?
Трамп: Я не могу рассказать вам, о чём мы беседовали, но могу сказать, что будет заключено соглашение. Это будет масштабное соглашение и оно будет касаться не только Украины. Я бы даже сказал,…
Настоящие переговоры проходят у Мелании Трамп, которая собрала в Белом доме по итогам операции в Олешках спецпредставителя Кирилла Дмитриева, главу фракции «Слуга народа» Давида Арахамия, украинского омбудсмена Дмитрия Лубинца и российскую омбудсмена Яну Лантратову.
Мелания рассказала, что Украина и Россия закрепили в письменных соглашениях её статус «эксклюзивного посредника», а отдельно как «непосредственный участ…
Рэм Эмануэль предложил первые шаги Демократам: антикоррупционный пакет в первые три месяца работы. Правила для трёх ветвей власти:
1️⃣ Запрет торговли акциями
2️⃣ Запрет участия в рынках прогнозов, денежных ставках на исход событий
3️⃣ Обязательная передача активов в слепой траст, которым владелец не управляет (и не управляет семья)
4️⃣ Ограничение сроков пребывания в должности
5️⃣ «Правило Кушнера»: запрет получать …
О важности просто иметь номер телефона: Трамп взял и ответил на звонок Даши Бернс в эфире Politico и поговорил о «голубой волне» и о том, что он готов сотрудничать с новыми членами Конгресса от Демократической партии
Я не хочу просто сидеть там два года и налагать вето на всё подряд.
Даша задала вопрос о том, готов ли президент проводить иммиграционную реформу вместе с демократами и он не стал отпираться, а ответил …
Трамп поздравил демократов с победой и сразу объяснил как понимает сотрудничество:
Я думаю, они захотят работать со мной. Иначе я просто буду накладывать вето на всё, а им этого не захочется
Такое трамповское приглашение к диалогу после публикации кепки «ВЕТО».
Будем осторожны с очередными политическими похоронами Трампа. Мы уже провожали Трампа после выборов 2020 г., после штурма Капитолия, после несостоявшейся «кр…
51+ в Сенате у Демократов, теперь можно сказать, что даже голос Джона Феттермана (часто голосующего с Республиканцами) не имеет значения в случае голосования строго по партийной линии. Ведь наверняка этот счёт будет пополнен, может быть Мичиганом, где баллотируется Абдул Эль-Сайед и Мэном, где Трой Джексон пытается победить Сьюзан Коллинз.
И не откажем в комплименте тому сотруднику Белого дома, который заказал сегод…
У демократов начинается следующий этап.
ОБЗАВЕДИТЕСЬ АДВОКАТАМИ
написал конгрессмен Роберт Гарсия — демократ (и вероятнее всего с 3 января председатель) в Комитете Палаты представителей по надзору. И закрепил сообщение.
Там-то будет главный центр расследований: слушания, требования предоставить документы, вызовы для дачи показаний.
Гарсия уже обозначил направления работы: возможная коррупция семьи Трампа, деятельнос…
Трампу не удалось добиться смены режима в Иране, зато получилось в Техасе. Джеймс Таларико победил Кена Пакстона.
Последний раз Техас избирал демократа в Сенат в 1988 г. И особенно важно, что Трамп поддержал Пакстона на республиканских праймериз против действующего сенатора республиканцы Джона Корнина. Сначала Трамп помог партии избавиться от собственного сенатора (не трамписта), а теперь помог демократам занять рес…
❤123🎉61😁23👍22🍾10🔥7❤🔥1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @USAelections24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
One Big Union @one_big_union · 20,017 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
Алексей Наумов. Внешпол @vneshpol · 21,198 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Милов. Команда @team_milov · 31,195 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
Безвольные каменщики @kamenschiki · 56,685 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Мозг на полную @full_brains · 23,170 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
Таня Ф. @tanya_f · 20,962 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elections 2026” (@USAelections24), 8,268 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USAelections24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.