Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elections 2026

Channel

Elections 2026

@USAelections24

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

7,748subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002021060230
TypeChannel
Username@USAelections24
Created17 January 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/USAelections24

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,7427,7627,7525 August 2026 — 7,761 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,761 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,762 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,757 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,750 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,746 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,742 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,743 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,745 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,746 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,744 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,753 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,745 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,743 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,748 subscribers7,7485 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,739–7,765 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:187,748+5
13 Sept 2026, 09:157,743-2
9 Sept 2026, 10:007,745-8
3 Sept 2026, 22:217,753+9
31 Aug 2026, 18:347,744-2
28 Aug 2026, 18:487,746+1
25 Aug 2026, 16:427,745+2
22 Aug 2026, 12:177,743+1
19 Aug 2026, 08:567,742-4
16 Aug 2026, 03:587,746-4
12 Aug 2026, 14:037,750-7
9 Aug 2026, 08:217,757-5
6 Aug 2026, 03:207,762+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:057,761no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:117,761first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.4%
avg views ÷ 7,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held16 (23 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total4,710
Reactions total190
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 46s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,572 reactions across 16 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
34722.1%
👍31520.0%
🤔21513.7%
🔥17311.0%
🤡16310.4%
😁694.39%
🤣573.63%
🤪352.23%
🥴342.16%
👀311.97%
🤯301.91%
💊281.78%
🕊201.27%
🤬110.7%
👎70.445%
👏70.445%
60.382%
🗿40.254%
🙏40.254%
🤓40.254%
8 further kinds120.763%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,572 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @USAelections24. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,160 views82 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ninotok

В Москву прилетел самолет ВВС США, но до сих пор остается тайной цель этого неожиданного визита. Песков разводит руками, и вот уже много часов нет никаких подробностей... А пока - послушайте новый выпуск "Супервторника" с лучшей американисткой Сашей Филиппенко! О новой любимице?/фаворитке?/любимой женщине?/сотруднице? Дональда Трампа; рекордном госдолге США; экономической войне с Канадой и новых угрозах в адрес Ирана

👍4130🔥10👎1

25 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈2,550 views108 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Зачем же прилетел во Внуково гигантский военно-транспортный Boeing C-17 Globemaster III ВВС США? Он вылетел 23 августа из Вашингтона в Ригу, а сегодня — в Москву. Песков говорит, что Кремль информации о борте не располагает (удивительно, правда?) и встреч с представителями администрации США на этой неделе в Кремле не запланировано. 🥟 Если прилетели не за порцией чебуреков… возможно это вывоз одного или нескольких за

🤔49👀2818👍6🙏4👏2🥰1

23 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,830 views97 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кит Келлог опубликовал фотографию из Киева с бывшим вице-президентом Трампа Майком Пенсом. Это неудивительно, ведь Келлог был советником Пенса по национальной безопасности. Теперь они оба за пределами нынешней администрации и фактически за пределами MAGA. Это любопытно, учитвая, как изменился образ Пенса в последние месяцы. Казалось, что он на обочине американской политики, но, по стечению обстоятельств, его Advanc

👍61🤔1811🔥5🗿2

11 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈5,130 views135 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Добро пожаловать в предвыборную кампанию 2028! На протяжении всей политической карьеры Марко Рубио его жена Жанетт держится в тени. Она давала интервью всего дважды – в 2012 г. (когда Митт Ромни рассматривал Рубио в качестве кандидата в вице-президенты) и в 2016 г. (когда сам Рубио выдвигался на праймериз Республиканской партии). И вот первое с 2016 г. интервью. В каждом цикле наступает момент, когда все отрицают,

70🤔30👍236🔥3🤷‍♂2🤡1

11 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈8,200 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Любимый момент всей истории: автофургон кейтеринга, неторопливо перемещающийся от президентского самолёта к военному. Именно там, судя по сообщениям источников NYT, WaPo и других, находился президент Трамп. Это (и не только это) мы обсудили с Нино Росебашвили в Супервторнике. 🛩 8 июля в Анкаре Дональда Трампа перед камерами доставили на борт президентского самолёта Air Force One, после чего президента незаметно выв

😁44🔥12🤔10🤡65🫡2👏1

30 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈4,370 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @PlushevChannel

Приходите на новый выпуск «Обсудим» в 19.00 мск! В гостях – бывший российский дипломат Борис Бондарев, и с ним сегодня обсудим: - что тревожит Лаврова, - чем Китай собрался помочь Ирану, - каковы итоги 40-дневной операции Зеленского, и многое другое.

👍25🔥117🌚2👎2

30 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC≈4,660 views130 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Никогда такого не было, и вот опять: Илон Маск возобновляет деятельность своего супер-PAC America PAC, который в 2024 г. потратил более $260 млн на поддержку избрания Трампа (основным жервователем был сам Маск, который в целом потратил более $300 млн на избирательную кампанию Трампа и Республиканской партии). Как сообщили Axios источники, America PAC сосредоточится на агитации «от двери к двери», цифровой рекламе и

🤡71🤔2312💊10🤬6👍5🕊2🏆1

29 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC≈4,140 views151 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Лора Лумер решила закрыть все гештальты! В Харькове она взяла интервью у основателя «Азова» и командующего Третьим армейским корпусом Украины. Я задала все вопросы, которые хотела задать. В том числе: правда ли, что в «Азове» и украинской армии полно неонацистов, размахивающих свастиками? Действительно ли мы финансируем армию нацистов, воюющую против россиян? Ранее, беседуя с Владимиром Зеленским, Лумер призналась: Я

🔥78😁25👍2411🤡6🤣4🗿2👎1

29 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC≈5,130 views122 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

В Сенате прошло первое голосование по законопроекту о санкциях в отношении России: 86 за и 12 против (11 демократов и 1 республиканец). Это ещё не принятие закона, но после такого в Сенате он уже не провалится. До голосования у законопроекта был как минимум 61 соавтор (видно как прямо во время общения с прессой авторы узнают, что точных голосов не 60, а 61). Владимир Зеленский и Александр Стубб наблюдали за заседани

68👍38🔥11🕊3👎2

28 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈3,550 views115 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Все следят за встречей Трампа и Зеленского, проходящей прямо сейчас за закрытыми дверями, а с Нино Росебашвили мы говорили о том, что в действительности встреча с сенаторами может оказаться гораздо более значимой (и о многом другом). Всегда есть вероятность, что Трамп немедленно предоставит PAC-2 и PAC-3, но… уверенности мало. Реальные изменения мы вероятно увидим позже. Первые кадры из Вашингтона дали Москве то, ч

70👍26🔥18👎1

26 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC≈9,530 views101 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Через 3 месяца был повторён ужин Ассоциации корреспондентов Белого дома. Трамп и действительно решил попробовать себя в роли стендапера, но хорошо встретили, кажется, только одну шутку: Мы добились поразительных успехов, о которых СМИ никогда не упоминают. Например, при моей администрации наконец-то был свергнут некогда грозный и могущественный режим, который безжалостно нападал на США, его бывшие лидеры отстранены о

👍33🥴26💊1613🤡4🤬4👀3🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC≈3,710 views103 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @USApoRusski

Переговоры между Рубио и Лавровым: госсекретарь США прокомментировал процесс и результаты Главные заявления по Украине: ▪️ О потерях России: «Россияне, как я полагаю, теряют от пяти до шести тысяч солдат в неделю. Это колоссальная цифра». ▪️ О прежних мирных инициативах: «Предложения "Анкориджа" провалились... Дело в том, что мирное соглашение невозможно без согласия обеих сторон, а украинцы на это не согласились,

🤪35👍19🤔1713🕊11👏3💊2🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @USAelections24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Милов. Команда
@team_milov · 31,576
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
Безвольные каменщики
@kamenschiki · 56,312
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Мозг на полную
@full_brains · 21,979
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q139721129 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelAlexandra Filippenko
Descriptionscholar of American politics

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elections 2026” (@USAelections24), 7,748 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USAelections24.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.