Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1,795. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,612–34,210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 05:19
33,800
-37
5 Sept 2026, 00:21
33,837
-73
3 Sept 2026, 06:59
33,910
+27
1 Sept 2026, 22:35
33,883
+180
31 Aug 2026, 22:29
33,703
+541
30 Aug 2026, 22:46
33,162
+601
29 Aug 2026, 23:04
32,561
+26
28 Aug 2026, 23:45
32,535
+41
27 Aug 2026, 23:08
32,494
+61
27 Aug 2026, 01:14
32,433
+33
26 Aug 2026, 04:34
32,400
+44
25 Aug 2026, 04:02
32,356
+28
23 Aug 2026, 23:45
32,328
+39
22 Aug 2026, 06:36
32,289
+34
21 Aug 2026, 00:32
32,255
+55
19 Aug 2026, 23:12
32,200
+22
18 Aug 2026, 22:05
32,178
+19
17 Aug 2026, 19:45
32,159
+26
16 Aug 2026, 14:44
32,133
+72
14 Aug 2026, 19:46
32,061
first reading
Engagement
124 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 33,800 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,260
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
90
of 124 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
124 (1 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
833,450
Reactions total
14,502
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 14:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
116
Videos
601
Links
611
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7h 58m
Average length
4m 42s
Measured directly from 102 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,432 reactions across 124 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,642
25.2%
❤
4,359
23.6%
💯
1,645
8.92%
🤬
1,447
7.85%
😈
951
5.16%
🔥
922
5.00%
🤔
712
3.86%
🤣
601
3.26%
🙏
397
2.15%
😡
348
1.89%
🥴
329
1.78%
👏
318
1.73%
😱
295
1.60%
👀
257
1.39%
💊
175
0.949%
😁
153
0.83%
😢
125
0.678%
🤨
102
0.553%
🥱
95
0.515%
🤯
83
0.45%
23 further kinds
476
2.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,432 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
214
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 124 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
200
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @US_History1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 124 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Their robes bore the mark of capacitors, relics of ancient circuitry disguised as holy design. Above them, structures of wire and stone reached upward, their lines and coils quietly drawing aether from the sky, all hidden in plain sight.
Join➡️ Untold Stories🪬
I recommend hidden channel: "📖 The Black Book Records"
🌲 In the fall of 1999, a strange story allegedly emerged from a remote forest in North Carolina.
According to local accounts, residents reported fires appearing at roughly the same time each night, metallic sounds echoing through the trees, and an unusual silence settling over the area before sunrise.
The story became even stranger when a hunter supposedly discovered a perfectly circular clearing containing a large s…
Hulda Clark was ahead of her time. She understood how important the Rife frequencies were.
Join➡️ Untold Stories🪬
I recommend hidden channel: "📖 The Black Book Records"
🗝 In 1779, a piece of furniture could be more than a cabinet — it could be a mechanical masterpiece.
German cabinetmaker David Roentgen created this extraordinary writing cabinet for Frederick William II, the future King of Prussia. At the time, Roentgen was considered one of Europe's most distinguished furniture makers, and his workshop attracted some of the most powerful figures on the continent.
His clients includ…
I'm going to read the FIRST prayer delivered to the Continental Congress and it's going to blow your mind.
Why have they fought so hard to erase this? Allow me to answer this question ✝️
Join➡️ Untold Stories🪬
I recommend hidden channel: "📖 The Black Book Records"
The document, produced in February 1951 and declassified in 2014, summarizes a Soviet scientific paper that examined striking similarities between parasitic worms and cancerous tumors
Join➡️ Untold Stories🪬
I recommend hidden channel: "📖 The Black Book Records"
🚗 In 1957, parking underground could be as simple as pressing a button.
Filmed in Hampstead, London, this remarkable footage captures an invention that looks surprisingly modern even today: an automatic underground car storage system.
With the push of a button, a concealed mechanical lift lowered a car beneath the pavement, removing it from the street and bringing it back up when needed. No multi-storey parking garag…
🏰 Beneath Disneyland: The Strange “Ryan’s Cave” Mystery
Disneyland is famous for its carefully designed environments, hidden details and backstage infrastructure. But years ago, an unusual story began circulating online about something supposedly far more unexpected beneath the park.
A man known online as Ryan allegedly explored an underground passage and claimed that it eventually led into — or extremely close to — …
🏺 The Gilgamesh Conspiracy: Why Did the Internet Connect an Ancient King to Hillary Clinton?
Few ancient names have generated as many legends as Gilgamesh, the legendary king at the center of the ancient Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh.
But an unusual conspiracy theory that has circulated online claims that the story goes much further.
According to the theory, Hillary Clinton was somehow connected to requests concerni…
What if 9,000-foot trees once covered the Earth, but something cut them down, and their remains are the mountains we see today?
Join➡️ Untold Stories🪬
I recommend hidden channel: "📖 The Black Book Records"
🛸 The Soviet “Grey Creature” File: A Mystery From the Winter of 1989
In the winter of 1989, an extraordinary story allegedly emerged from the Soviet Union.
According to claims attributed to supposed classified Soviet archives, a team of Soviet personnel encountered an unidentified object near a forest inspection station in the northern part of Chelyabinsk.
The story becomes even stranger from there.
Witness accounts …
🥴55❤27😨16😁11👍10
Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @US_History1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@US_History1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Untold Stories” (@US_History1), 33,800 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/US_History1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.