Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اساتید دانشگاه تهران

Channel

اساتید دانشگاه تهران

@UTeacherz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,030subscribers

+2,141 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001542490103
TypeChannel
Username@UTeacherz
Descriptionنظرات دانشجویان راجع به اساتید دانشگاه تهران «این کانال هیچ رسمیتی از سوی دانشگاه ندارد» ✒️ثبت نظر: @UTeachersBot 💢 مسئولیت نظرات این کانال با ادمین ها نیست. تمامی مطالب کانال، صرفاً نظرات دانشجویان در مورد اساتید می باشد.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/UTeacherz

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,88819,03017,9596 August 2026 — 16,889 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,888 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,894 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,903 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,901 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,917 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,931 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,949 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,954 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,969 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,997 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,005 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,017 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,034 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,063 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,107 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,138 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,209 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,279 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,429 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,587 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,648 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,690 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,732 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,767 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,795 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,815 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,843 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,855 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,870 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,883 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,904 subscribers30 September 2026 — 18,024 subscribers6 October 2026 — 18,069 subscribers10 October 2026 — 18,100 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,182 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,185 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,192 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,201 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,209 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,210 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,448 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,588 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,660 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,692 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,742 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,764 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,807 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,825 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,899 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,943 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,958 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,987 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,998 subscribers2 November 2026 — 19,006 subscribers3 November 2026 — 19,022 subscribers4 November 2026 — 19,019 subscribers5 November 2026 — 19,030 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,141. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,567–19,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:1619,030+11
4 Nov 2026, 18:2119,019-3
3 Nov 2026, 18:0119,022+16
2 Nov 2026, 17:2719,006+8
1 Nov 2026, 19:0118,998+11
31 Oct 2026, 18:1018,987+29
30 Oct 2026, 19:0118,958+15
29 Oct 2026, 16:5618,943+44
28 Oct 2026, 14:0418,899+74
27 Oct 2026, 11:4718,825+18
26 Oct 2026, 13:4618,807+43
25 Oct 2026, 12:4718,764+22
24 Oct 2026, 14:0418,742+50
23 Oct 2026, 10:4718,692+32
22 Oct 2026, 09:0718,660+72
21 Oct 2026, 04:4918,588+140
20 Oct 2026, 04:5618,448+238
19 Oct 2026, 04:1818,210+1
18 Oct 2026, 02:4618,209+8
17 Oct 2026, 03:1518,201first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.4%
avg views ÷ 19,030 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,300
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held23 (4 January 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total24,500
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 03:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈15
Links
≈2,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

619 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍37159.9%
👎20833.6%
🔥406.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 619 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Oct 2026, 22:15 UTC≈12,000 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

اگر نظری راجع به هرکدوم دارید در قسمت کامنت بنویسید.

🔥11

9 Oct 2026, 22:14 UTCviews —

اساتید دانشگاه تهران pinned «بهترین دانشگاه ایران در رشته معماری کدام است؟»

9 Oct 2026, 22:14 UTC≈12,500 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

بهترین دانشگاه ایران در رشته معماری کدام است؟

  1. نمیدانم! /مشاهده نتایج46%
  2. دانشگاه تهران39%
  3. دانشگاه علم و صنعت1%
  4. دانشگاه شهید بهشتی3%
  5. دانشگاه هنر تهران6%
  6. دانشگاه هنر اصفهان2%
  7. دانشگاه یزد1%
  8. دانشگاه شیراز1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥29👍4

5 Jan 2026, 17:38 UTC≈61,600 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 فرزاد زیویار 🧑🏻‍🏫 نام درس: تربیت بدنی ✍️ نظر: اول ترم که میخواستم باهاش بردارم نظر خاصی دربارش پیدا نکردم و همینطور شانسی باهاش برداشتم، ولی واقعا استاد خوبیه برخلاف خیلی دیگه از استادای تربیت بدنی اذیت نمیکنه. تمریناش خیلی سخت نیست و بازم میگم نسبت به استادای دیگه خیلی روال تره حضورغیاب براش مهمه ولی اگه از قبل باهاش هماهنگ کنین اصلا گیر نمیده اکثر بچه ها هم گفت که بین ۱۹ تا ۲۰ میده اگه سعی نکنین بپیچونینش را…

👍66👎25

5 Jan 2026, 17:38 UTC≈48,600 views93 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 احسان معانی میاندوآب 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده علوم مهندسی ✍️ نظر: سلام امیدوارم سلامت باشین. استاد معانی استاد محترم و با عشقی هستن. تی ای دارن مثل دسته گل. سر کلاساشون درس خون باشی میتونی نمره اضافی بگیری.مثلا هر جلسه یک یا بیشتر سوال مطرح میکنن و میگن هرکی جواب بده ۰.۲۵ صدم میگیره و ... روز دانشجو هم نیم نمره به همه هدیه دادن. تو درس دادن جزو سلاطین ریاضی ۲ هستن تعریف بیجا نمیکنم هرکی با ایشون داشته ک…

👎54👍39

5 Jan 2026, 17:38 UTC≈41,300 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 نیلوفر سادات روستاییان 🧑🏻‍🏫 نام درس: تربیت بدنی ✍️ نظر: این استاد به معنای واقعی کلمه متواضع و با درکه امتحانش فوق العاده راحته و سه حرکت بیشتر نداره و اون هم با توجه به میزان پیشرفت خودتون از روز اولی هست که تست میگیره اگر غیبت هاتون بیشتر بشه هم میتونید به جای اون ی روز دیگه ای که کلا داره شرکت کنید در کل خیلی با دانشجو راه میاد و به فکر پیشرفت همه هست @UTGroups

👍24👎3

5 Jan 2026, 10:46 UTC≈39,600 views59 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 عباس قربانی 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده معارف و اندیشه اسلامی ✍️ نظر: با سلام و ارادت. استاد قربانی با توجه به نظراتی که راجع بهش هست،استاد با شخصیت و مهربانی هستند.با ایشون یک درس عمومی داشتم اونم اندیشه یک آیت الله سبحانی بود. ایشون میانترم میگیره تا دانشجو رو به شیوه ای مجبور به خوندن کنه اما میانترمش سفت و سخت نبود. تو تاریخ برگزاریش هم با دانشجو کنار میاد. .سر کلاس ایشون چیزی رو میبینید که تو کلاس هیچ…

👎51👍8

4 Jan 2026, 18:57 UTC≈23,800 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 سید فضل‌الله قدس میرحیدری 🧑🏻‍🏫 نام درس: ورزش / تربیت‌بدنی ✍️ نظر: این ترم با استاد سید فضل‌الله قدس میرحیدری ورزش فوتبال داشتیم. جلسات اینطور بود که اول جلسه ۱۰ دقیقه‌ای روپایی میزدیم برای گرم‌کردن و بعدش شروع به تمرین تکنیک‌های فوتبالی میکردیم. مثل پاس، حرکت با توپ، دریبل و شوت. هر جلسه معمولا اول تکنیک جلسه قبل رو تمرین میکردیم و بعد تکنیک جدید رو. اخر کلاس هم ۱۰ الی ۱۵ دقیقه فوتبال بازی میکردیم. کلاس‌ها معم…

👎13👍5

4 Jan 2026, 15:07 UTC≈24,000 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 مهدی نوری 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده اقتصاد ✍️ نظر: کلان داشتم باهاش خیلی پراکنده درس میده، سر کلاس مطالب بی ربط زیاد داره، دیر هم میاد. خود آدم باید بشینه منبع رو بخونه، کلاس هیچ فایده ای نداره، همیشه قبل اینکه بیاد یه ربعی دستیارش آقای ضیایی میومد، درسو مرور میکرد یه توضیحاتی میداد و یه چیزایی از اقتصاد کلان درس میداد، اون یه ربعا خیلی برامون مفید تر و منسجم تر از کل کلاسای یه ساعته بعدش بود!!! هرهفته …

👍23👎4

4 Jan 2026, 13:29 UTC≈23,600 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 جعفر نوری یوشانلوئی 🎖 درجه: دانشیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی ✍️ نظر: دو ترم باهاشون تجارت داشتم و واقعا خسته شدم تو کلاس فقط از روی یه جزوه‌ای می‌خونن و بچه‌ها می‌نویسن خودم هم سعی می‌کردم چند جلسه‌ اول بنویسم اما دیدم نمی‌تونم با چنین روش تدریسی ارتباط نتونستم برقرار کنم هیچی هم سر کلاس از حقوق تجارت یاد نگرفتم من منکر سواد ایشون نیستم اما هنر تدریس چیزیه که هر استادی نداره اگرچه اینطور که شنیدم ا…

👍43👎3

4 Jan 2026, 13:28 UTC≈19,400 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 زهرا آقایی 🧑🏻‍🏫 نام درس: شیمی تجزیه ✍️ نظر: ایشون از روی اسلاید های خودشون درس میدن که کاملا ناقص و پر از غلطه سر کلاس هم بیشتر مثال هارو غلط حل میکنن و وقتی بهشون میگین هم اصلا توجهی نمیکنن و کار خودشون رو ادامه میدن. در کل اصلا انتقاد پذیر نیستن و با دانشجو راه نمیان. سر میانترم هم گفتن هرکس اعتراض کنه و نمره ای بهش اضافه نشه، دو نمره کم میکنن ازش. در کل اصلا پیشنهاد نمیشه @UTGroups

👎16👍11

4 Jan 2026, 13:28 UTC≈23,100 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👤 جواد حق گو 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده معارف و اندیشه اسلامی ✍️ نظر: من این ترم با استاد حق گو قانون اساسی داشتم. البته هنوز نمیتونم درباره نحوه نمره دادنشون نظر بدم ولی شنیدم منصفن و حق هر کسی رو دقیق بهش میدن.برای همین میگن هر ترم هم نوزده و بیست داره هم مردودی.به لحاظ کیفیت کلاس شخصا یکی از بهترین دروس دوران تحصیلم رو داشتم. سطح بحثهایی که در کلاس مطرح میکنن خیلی بالاتر از یه درسه دو واحدی اونم دروس عمو…

👍23👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @UTeacherz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Oct 2026, 22:14 UTCFinal Results2,260 voters approx.

بهترین دانشگاه ایران در رشته معماری کدام است؟

  1. نمیدانم! /مشاهده نتایج46%
  2. دانشگاه تهران39%
  3. دانشگاه علم و صنعت1%
  4. دانشگاه شهید بهشتی3%
  5. دانشگاه هنر تهران6%
  6. دانشگاه هنر اصفهان2%
  7. دانشگاه یزد1%
  8. دانشگاه شیراز1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

همیار دانشگاه تهران
@hamyarUT · 25,172
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
شبکه دانشگاه تهران UTV
@Ut_internet_tv · 25,318
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Ut.ac
@ut_ac · 41,012
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
کوی‌ستان
@Kooyestan · 44,305
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه تهران
@UT_Central_Library · 25,129
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
دانشگاه تهران
@UT_NEWSLINE · 56,671
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
مرکز مشاوره دانشگاه تهران
@UTcounseling · 24,645
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 September 2026
توییتر دانشگاه تهرانی ها
@uttweet · 143,897
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
سامانه کاریابی دانشگاه های تهران
@job_ut · 27,096
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
کتابخانه دانشجویی ایران
@ketabkhaneh_iran · 74,422
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
کتابخانه مجازی دانشگاه
@PNUIRketab · 90,859
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
جزوه جو | jozvehjo
@jozvehjo · 24,345
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
[ بیشُعوری ]
@officialbish0uri · 29,028
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 September 2026
دانشجو برتر 🎓
@danshjo_bartar · 95,405
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
اپلای مپ
@ApplyMap · 19,453
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اساتید دانشگاه تهران” (@UTeacherz), 19,030 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UTeacherz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.