اگر نظری راجع به هرکدوم دارید در قسمت کامنت بنویسید.
🔥11

Channel
@UTeacherz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,030subscribers
+2,141 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001542490103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UTeacherz |
| Description | نظرات دانشجویان راجع به اساتید دانشگاه تهران «این کانال هیچ رسمیتی از سوی دانشگاه ندارد» ✒️ثبت نظر: @UTeachersBot 💢 مسئولیت نظرات این کانال با ادمین ها نیست. تمامی مطالب کانال، صرفاً نظرات دانشجویان در مورد اساتید می باشد. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UTeacherz |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:16 | 19,030 | +11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:21 | 19,019 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:01 | 19,022 | +16 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:27 | 19,006 | +8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:01 | 18,998 | +11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:10 | 18,987 | +29 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 18,958 | +15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 18,943 | +44 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:04 | 18,899 | +74 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 18,825 | +18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 18,807 | +43 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 18,764 | +22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:04 | 18,742 | +50 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 18,692 | +32 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 18,660 | +72 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 18,588 | +140 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 18,448 | +238 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 18,210 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 18,209 | +8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:15 | 18,201 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (4 January 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 24,500 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 03:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
619 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 371 | 59.9% | |
| 👎 | 208 | 33.6% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 6.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 619 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اگر نظری راجع به هرکدوم دارید در قسمت کامنت بنویسید.
🔥11
اساتید دانشگاه تهران pinned «بهترین دانشگاه ایران در رشته معماری کدام است؟»
بهترین دانشگاه ایران در رشته معماری کدام است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥29👍4
👤 فرزاد زیویار 🧑🏻🏫 نام درس: تربیت بدنی ✍️ نظر: اول ترم که میخواستم باهاش بردارم نظر خاصی دربارش پیدا نکردم و همینطور شانسی باهاش برداشتم، ولی واقعا استاد خوبیه برخلاف خیلی دیگه از استادای تربیت بدنی اذیت نمیکنه. تمریناش خیلی سخت نیست و بازم میگم نسبت به استادای دیگه خیلی روال تره حضورغیاب براش مهمه ولی اگه از قبل باهاش هماهنگ کنین اصلا گیر نمیده اکثر بچه ها هم گفت که بین ۱۹ تا ۲۰ میده اگه سعی نکنین بپیچونینش را…
👍66👎25
👤 احسان معانی میاندوآب 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده علوم مهندسی ✍️ نظر: سلام امیدوارم سلامت باشین. استاد معانی استاد محترم و با عشقی هستن. تی ای دارن مثل دسته گل. سر کلاساشون درس خون باشی میتونی نمره اضافی بگیری.مثلا هر جلسه یک یا بیشتر سوال مطرح میکنن و میگن هرکی جواب بده ۰.۲۵ صدم میگیره و ... روز دانشجو هم نیم نمره به همه هدیه دادن. تو درس دادن جزو سلاطین ریاضی ۲ هستن تعریف بیجا نمیکنم هرکی با ایشون داشته ک…
👎54👍39
👤 نیلوفر سادات روستاییان 🧑🏻🏫 نام درس: تربیت بدنی ✍️ نظر: این استاد به معنای واقعی کلمه متواضع و با درکه امتحانش فوق العاده راحته و سه حرکت بیشتر نداره و اون هم با توجه به میزان پیشرفت خودتون از روز اولی هست که تست میگیره اگر غیبت هاتون بیشتر بشه هم میتونید به جای اون ی روز دیگه ای که کلا داره شرکت کنید در کل خیلی با دانشجو راه میاد و به فکر پیشرفت همه هست @UTGroups
👍24👎3
👤 عباس قربانی 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده معارف و اندیشه اسلامی ✍️ نظر: با سلام و ارادت. استاد قربانی با توجه به نظراتی که راجع بهش هست،استاد با شخصیت و مهربانی هستند.با ایشون یک درس عمومی داشتم اونم اندیشه یک آیت الله سبحانی بود. ایشون میانترم میگیره تا دانشجو رو به شیوه ای مجبور به خوندن کنه اما میانترمش سفت و سخت نبود. تو تاریخ برگزاریش هم با دانشجو کنار میاد. .سر کلاس ایشون چیزی رو میبینید که تو کلاس هیچ…
👎51👍8
👤 سید فضلالله قدس میرحیدری 🧑🏻🏫 نام درس: ورزش / تربیتبدنی ✍️ نظر: این ترم با استاد سید فضلالله قدس میرحیدری ورزش فوتبال داشتیم. جلسات اینطور بود که اول جلسه ۱۰ دقیقهای روپایی میزدیم برای گرمکردن و بعدش شروع به تمرین تکنیکهای فوتبالی میکردیم. مثل پاس، حرکت با توپ، دریبل و شوت. هر جلسه معمولا اول تکنیک جلسه قبل رو تمرین میکردیم و بعد تکنیک جدید رو. اخر کلاس هم ۱۰ الی ۱۵ دقیقه فوتبال بازی میکردیم. کلاسها معم…
👎13👍5
👤 مهدی نوری 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده اقتصاد ✍️ نظر: کلان داشتم باهاش خیلی پراکنده درس میده، سر کلاس مطالب بی ربط زیاد داره، دیر هم میاد. خود آدم باید بشینه منبع رو بخونه، کلاس هیچ فایده ای نداره، همیشه قبل اینکه بیاد یه ربعی دستیارش آقای ضیایی میومد، درسو مرور میکرد یه توضیحاتی میداد و یه چیزایی از اقتصاد کلان درس میداد، اون یه ربعا خیلی برامون مفید تر و منسجم تر از کل کلاسای یه ساعته بعدش بود!!! هرهفته …
👍23👎4
👤 جعفر نوری یوشانلوئی 🎖 درجه: دانشیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی ✍️ نظر: دو ترم باهاشون تجارت داشتم و واقعا خسته شدم تو کلاس فقط از روی یه جزوهای میخونن و بچهها مینویسن خودم هم سعی میکردم چند جلسه اول بنویسم اما دیدم نمیتونم با چنین روش تدریسی ارتباط نتونستم برقرار کنم هیچی هم سر کلاس از حقوق تجارت یاد نگرفتم من منکر سواد ایشون نیستم اما هنر تدریس چیزیه که هر استادی نداره اگرچه اینطور که شنیدم ا…
👍43👎3
👤 زهرا آقایی 🧑🏻🏫 نام درس: شیمی تجزیه ✍️ نظر: ایشون از روی اسلاید های خودشون درس میدن که کاملا ناقص و پر از غلطه سر کلاس هم بیشتر مثال هارو غلط حل میکنن و وقتی بهشون میگین هم اصلا توجهی نمیکنن و کار خودشون رو ادامه میدن. در کل اصلا انتقاد پذیر نیستن و با دانشجو راه نمیان. سر میانترم هم گفتن هرکس اعتراض کنه و نمره ای بهش اضافه نشه، دو نمره کم میکنن ازش. در کل اصلا پیشنهاد نمیشه @UTGroups
👎16👍11
👤 جواد حق گو 🎖 درجه: استادیار 🏢 محل کار: دانشکده معارف و اندیشه اسلامی ✍️ نظر: من این ترم با استاد حق گو قانون اساسی داشتم. البته هنوز نمیتونم درباره نحوه نمره دادنشون نظر بدم ولی شنیدم منصفن و حق هر کسی رو دقیق بهش میدن.برای همین میگن هر ترم هم نوزده و بیست داره هم مردودی.به لحاظ کیفیت کلاس شخصا یکی از بهترین دروس دوران تحصیلم رو داشتم. سطح بحثهایی که در کلاس مطرح میکنن خیلی بالاتر از یه درسه دو واحدی اونم دروس عمو…
👍23👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @UTeacherz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بهترین دانشگاه ایران در رشته معماری کدام است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اساتید دانشگاه تهران” (@UTeacherz), 19,030 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UTeacherz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.