خليها في بالك إن الانسان مش ديما ح يتقبل منك اي تصرف ويقعد ساكت باش يحافظ على الود حيجي اليوم اللي يردك فيه صفر ويتجاهلك وكأنه ما يعرفكش

Channel
بوزر
@U_X_U_l
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-11,047 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001830856385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @U_X_U_l |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/U_X_U_l |
Previous handles
@U_X_U_l was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 2 | -11,295 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 11,297 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 11,296 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 11,283 | +13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 11,270 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 11,275 | +12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,263 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 11,268 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 11,270 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 11,275 | +10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 11,265 | +19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 11,246 | +19 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 11,227 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 11,224 | +26 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 11,198 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 11,184 | +29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 11,155 | +12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 11,143 | +60 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,083 | +34 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 11,049 | first reading |
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5816.7%
- avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 116
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (19 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 349 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 94 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @U_X_U_l. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
الخبث مش شطاره ولي يفزع مش مضحكة ولي طبعه راجل خير من الي شكله راجل 😒❤️🩹
ترواح للحوش بمشاكل العمل وتمشي للعمل بمشاكل الحوش وانت ساكت ومتحكيش هاذا هوا صبر الرجال 💔😮💨
صح ميكلموش فينا لاكن عيونهم ديماا علينا 🤦♂️ - فهمت يٌ كميرا ولا 😒👌
الدخان هوا الشي الذي لا يخونك هوا يحترق لا اجلك وانت تموت لااجله نعم هاذا هوا الوفاء 💔🚬
« لاشيء حقيقي سوى الوقت الذي يمضي من أعمارنا "
عمري مقصرت معاهم ولا عمري خلطت فيهم لكن قدام البرانية طلحنا اوسخ ناس
مرات هما ماتغيروش ، انت كنت واخذ عليهم فكره كويسه وبعدين طلعوا ع حقيقتهم بس !
Live stream started
https://t.me/CIC0lO
) إشتـراك لِلٖ ابطَـالٖ (:» @il4lU 🌷 (
t.me/liliii02
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @U_X_U_l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@U_X_U_l edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 15 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Qp_l70 · 2,7883 postsمُحمّد إبراهيم.
@xi7ni · 8233 postsً
@ABI0I · 12 posts﮼مُ .
@Billll7 · 52 posts𝙍𝙀𝘿 𝟸𝟶
@Redl06 · 4802 postsمُحَمَّد عقِيلة .
@cv3ix · 6,4862 posts៹ 𝗌𝖪Ꭵ𝗅𝗅𝗌 .
@llXllUI · 4702 posts- خليفه الزواوي .
@Bl0l7 · 2,7151 post𓏺 𝛦𝖋𝖋𝛦𝘾𝜯
@Bl_lX · 7711 post﮼حمِيَد،الحمِࢪيَ .
@Cili01 · 9,7501 post᷂منـُوش ᷂محمد ᷂.
@GL_5Hl · 1,2681 post𝐀𝐒𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐈.🇪🇦
@IUl_I1 · 10,2651 postمُصعَب،الوَرفلِي .
@M8IOI · 3,2621 post﮼مِيرُو .
@M_III_7 · 4,6101 post-مَحطة مشاعِري
@OH20B · 4,0331 post𝐂𝐔𝐓𝐄
@So0l0 · 6491 post﮼فاطمِة الزَّهرَاء .
@Wlli0o · 1,0451 postݺ٫عـآشِـق بِـلا ضَجيـج♡ .
@X5_5N · 1851 post...
@YIOIR · 11 post• 𝑯 🇱🇾 .
@Z66_0 · 4261 post•『 𝐁𝑳𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐓』
@albdooooooea · 1,9671 post.
@bngaze_2022 · 21 postآيات الثمُوني .
@iiitota05 · 1,8211 postݺ،جيسيكا
@jecka00 · 3461 post- ﮼ميؤوس،مِنهَا
@lNlXI · 8,6101 postأديــــم 🧢
@lPlUI · 2,2231 post𓏺 الدشاش .
@lY19U · 3591 post𓆩🦅𝐴𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟🦅𓆪
@lliirabe1 · 1,2881 postـ قِـفَ 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗣 .
@llvl2Q · 4,7401 postℓ يـوميـآت بنية ليبية
@p_o_x05 · 2,5221 postمُحمَد الدرسِي
@t_o_65 · 4,3421 postذِكْرٌ .
@txa_x09 · 4001 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Redl06 · 4802 posts•『 𝐁𝑳𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐓』
@albdooooooea · 1,9671 post𓏺 𝛦𝖋𝖋𝛦𝘾𝜯
@Bl_lX · 7711 post.
@bngaze_2022 · 21 postمُحَمَّد عقِيلة .
@cv3ix · 6,4861 postݺ،جيسيكا
@jecka00 · 3461 postأديــــم 🧢
@lPlUI · 2,2231 post﮼مِيرُو .
@M_III_7 · 4,6101 post𝐂𝐔𝐓𝐄
@So0l0 · 6491 post
@X0IXI0 · 5561 post• 𝑯 🇱🇾 .
@Z66_0 · 4261 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Kalam_libey · 25,671
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 September 2026
@almshrgii · 123,019
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@zcguiop · 29,254
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 8 September 2026
@qwefghu · 27,738
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
@kjhgtuip · 24,340
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 September 2026
@na3lya · 54,153
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 September 2026
@Q_R_N9 · 79,232
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بوزر” (@U_X_U_l), 2 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/U_X_U_l.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.