No.1 Channel On Telegram To get UDEMY Coupons
Website For Free Coupons: http://www.Coursevania.com
#DMCA Disclosure
https://t.me/coursevaniaDMCA/3
For Feedback/promotions contact
@Tricksinfo_bot
Donate:- https://ko-fi.com/coursevania
Created
Between 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2018 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 114 of the 114 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 68 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @freeonlinecourses_paid_to_free. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
46 measurements spanning 75 days, net -6,190. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 248,612–256,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Oct 2026, 12:48
249,540
-124
19 Oct 2026, 12:04
249,664
-89
18 Oct 2026, 12:37
249,753
-61
17 Oct 2026, 12:19
249,814
-80
16 Oct 2026, 15:11
249,894
-64
15 Oct 2026, 16:55
249,958
-122
14 Oct 2026, 14:30
250,080
-67
13 Oct 2026, 05:09
250,147
-344
8 Oct 2026, 23:38
250,491
-427
4 Oct 2026, 13:14
250,918
-803
26 Sept 2026, 06:39
251,721
-505
19 Sept 2026, 06:56
252,226
-208
16 Sept 2026, 20:37
252,434
-117
15 Sept 2026, 01:41
252,551
-81
13 Sept 2026, 09:41
252,632
-143
11 Sept 2026, 10:42
252,775
-292
8 Sept 2026, 16:01
253,067
-287
5 Sept 2026, 12:17
253,354
-132
3 Sept 2026, 12:37
253,486
-104
2 Sept 2026, 04:57
253,590
first reading
Engagement
2,943 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 154 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.12%
avg views ÷ 249,540 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
1,160 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.253%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,160
of 2,943 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 439 of 1,160 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026
Posts held
2,943 (6 August 2026 – 20 October 2026)
Views total
345,924
Reactions total
455
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Oct 2026, 23:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈103,000
Videos
≈16
Links
≈106,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
369 reactions across 294 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
322
87.3%
👍
19
5.15%
😭
11
2.98%
🔥
10
2.71%
🤩
7
1.90%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 361 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Cómo Transmitir en Vivo Por las Redes Sociales 2025
FREE - 10 Enrolls Left
¿QUIERES REALIZAR TRANSMISIONES EN VIVO PROFESIONALES EN LAS REDES SOCIALES?Únase a nuestro curso completo para mostrarle cómo realizar transmisiones en vivo profesionales en las principales redes sociales. Independientemente del propósito de sus transmisiones en vivo, este curso le mostrará todo lo...
Coupon Code:- OCTUBRE202605
Enrolls: 1…
MailerLite 2025: Cómo Crear Campañas de Email Marketing
FREE - 10 Enrolls Left
MailerLite es un proveedor de servicios de marketing por correo electrónico, te permite crear rápidamente campañas de correo electrónico, realizar un seguimiento de los resultados de tus campañas, gestionar y segmentar a tus suscriptores, crear formularios de suscripción, diseñar ventanas emergentes...
Coupon Code:- OCTUBRE202605
Enroll…
Russian Through Real Dialogues
FREE - 94 Enrolls Left
This course contains the use of artificial intelligence.Most German courses teach you grammar rules and vocabulary lists. Then you sit in a real conversation and freeze.This course is different.Every lesson is built around a single real German dialogue. You will not study it — you will live it. Thro...
Coupon Code:- 809502AB5C3E43424C0B
Enrolls: 94/100
🔗 https…
Aprenda espanhol por meio de conversas reais
FREE - 98 Enrolls Left
Este curso utiliza inteligência artificial.A maioria dos cursos de espanhol ensina regras gramaticais e listas de vocabulário. Depois, você participa de uma conversa real e trava.Este curso é diferente.Cada aula é construída em torno de um diálogo real em espanhol. Você não vai apenas estudá-lo: vai...
Coupon Code:- 13957907578A5EA9BCE2
Enrolls: 9…
Arabic Through Real Dialogues
FREE - 98 Enrolls Left
This course contains the use of artificial intelligence.Most Arabic courses teach you grammar rules and vocabulary lists. Then you sit in a real conversation and freeze.This course is different.Every lesson is built around a single real Arabic dialogue. You will not study it — you will live it. Thro...
Coupon Code:- 9C556BBD89B10F93A2EB
Enrolls: 98/100
🔗 https:…
تعلم الإيطالية من خلال محادثات واقعية
FREE - 98 Enrolls Left
تتضمن هذه الدورة استخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي.تعتمد معظم دورات تعلّم الإيطالية على شرح القواعد وقوائم المفردات. ثم يجد المتعلم نفسه في محادثة حقيقية ولا يعرف كيف يرد.هذه الدورة مختلفة.يرتكز كل درس على حوار إيطالي واقعي واحد. لن تكتفِ بدراسته؛ بل ستعيشه خطوةً خطوة. ومن خلال منهج منظّم من ثلاث مراحل، مستو...
Coupon Code:- F0736DEE79D87ABE8FA4
Enrolls: 98/100
…
Italian Through Real Dialogues
FREE - 99 Enrolls Left
This course contains the use of artificial intelligence.Most Italian courses teach you grammar rules and vocabulary lists. Then you sit in a real conversation and freeze.This course is different.Every lesson is built around a single real Italian dialogue. You will not study it — you will live it. Th...
Coupon Code:- FBFC782D8E7F74761905
Enrolls: 99/100
🔗 https…
Mexikanisches Spanisch lernen mit echten Gesprächen
FREE - 99 Enrolls Left
In diesem Kurs kommt künstliche Intelligenz zum Einsatz.Viele Deutschkurse beginnen mit Grammatikregeln und Vokabellisten. Doch in einem echten Gespräch fehlen Ihnen plötzlich die Worte.Dieser Kurs ist anders.Jede Lektion basiert auf einem echten Dialog auf Deutsch. Sie lernen den Dialog nicht nur, ...
Coupon Code:- 02CE9C0DE493A261B9A2
Enr…
French Through Real Dialogues
FREE - 99 Enrolls Left
This course contains the use of artificial intelligence.Most French courses teach you grammar rules and vocabulary lists. Then you sit in a real conversation and freeze.This course is different.Every lesson is built around a single real French dialogue. You will not study it — you will live it. Thro...
Coupon Code:- B971C58458A053097DDB
Enrolls: 99/100
🔗 https:…
AB-100 Agentic AI Business Solutions Architect Practice Exam
FREE - 98 Enrolls Left
In order to set realistic expectations, please note: These questions are NOT official questions that you will find on the official exam. These questions DO cover all the material outlined in the knowledge sections below. Many of the questions are based on realistic business and enterprise AI transfo...
Coupon Code:- 624AF4060388B71…
CompTIA Linux+ V8 (XK0-006) Practice Exam Course
FREE - 100 Enrolls Left
Ready to advance your Linux administration skills and earn the CompTIA Linux+ (XK0-006) certification? This comprehensive practice exam course is designed to help you assess your knowledge, build confidence, and fully prepare for the real exam. With realistic practice tests that closely mirror the f...
Coupon Code:- 935C4223411E0A2249ED
Enrol…
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,943 posts we hold for @Udemy4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Udemy Free Course ( Udemy Gratis) @Udemyfree4_u · 26,094 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 12 September 2026
Master the Coding Interview @Master_Coding_Interview · 30,285 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
Soft Skills @SoftSkills101 · 35,735 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
Front End World @front_end_first · 25,799 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Programming, data science, ML - free courses by Big Data Specialist @bigdataspecialist · 26,339 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Coding & AI Resources @leadcoding · 35,344 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UDEMY FREE ️| Coursevania” (@Udemy4), 249,540 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Udemy4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.