Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ULTIMATE CHAD CALLS

Channel

ULTIMATE CHAD CALLS

@UltimateChadCalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

107subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001800391164
TypeChannel
Username@UltimateChadCalls
CreatedBetween 1 September 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UltimateChadCalls

Growth

1071091087 August 2026 — 109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 109 subscribers9 September 2026 — 107 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 14:38107-2
9 Aug 2026, 07:45109no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:28109first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2025 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Dec 2025, 16:15 UTCviews —

ULTIMATE CHAD CALLS pinned «TRUST ME BRO $TMB (XRPL) This one could be the new Meta. Team seems based and active. Community holding strong. Good narrative and nice memes. Check this out. https://dexscreener.com/xrpl/tmb.rlk1zo3qvzw4ps4fgbkhen4fcmax2uf8sf_xrp "Trust Me Bro" (TMB) …»

16 Dec 2025, 16:14 UTC127 viewsread 9 August 2026

TRUST ME BRO $TMB (XRPL) This one could be the new Meta. Team seems based and active. Community holding strong. Good narrative and nice memes. Check this out. https://dexscreener.com/xrpl/tmb.rlk1zo3qvzw4ps4fgbkhen4fcmax2uf8sf_xrp "Trust Me Bro" (TMB) - the memecoin where skepticism is left at the door and trust is the currency. Imagine a world where your investment decisions are made with a handshake emoji and a

2 Nov 2025, 11:57 UTC191 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

LEDGERGUY Buy! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 💸 Spent: 100.00 XRP ($254.23) 🔀 Bought: 27,182.35 LEDGERGUY 👤 rUCc...1Cr | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💵 Market Cap : $93,527 📊 Chart | Trending 💵 Buy on: Horizon - PHNIX Bot 🔥 XRP TRENDING #1

2 Nov 2025, 07:21 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🆕 New BUY LEDGERGUY 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 💵 500.00 XRP | $1,260.00 🪙 207,238 LEDGERGUY ⛏ Tx | ⚠️ New Holder!!! 🪙 Buyer | Wallet: 520.66 XRP 🦅 Chart | XRPL Trending 💰 Market Cap: $49,076 ⭐️ Hold: 159

1

2 Nov 2025, 05:00 UTC87 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🆕 New BUY LEDGERGUY 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 👨‍⚖ 🐳 Small Whale Alert 💵 50.00 XRP | $125.50 🪙 35,447 LEDGERGUY ⛏ Tx | +31.91% | T: 1.47% 🪙 Buyer | Wallet: 4653.48 XRP 🦅 Chart | XRPL Trending 💰 Market Cap: $35,967 ⭐️ Hold: 148 | Trust: 242 🛒 Horizon | XMagnetic 🤖 Ribble | XRP Sniper 🔍 XTR Scanner | Bubble Map 😀 XTR bot in 3320 groups.

2 Nov 2025, 03:54 UTCviews —

ULTIMATE CHAD CALLS pinned «$LEDGERGUY ON XRP This one could be the new Meta. Dev seems based and active. Community very strong. Narrative is very crazy too. ATH after ATH happening here. Check this out. https://dexscreener.com/xrpl/4c45444745524755590000000000000000000000.reuo2p6…»

2 Nov 2025, 03:54 UTC126 viewsread 9 August 2026

$LEDGERGUY ON XRP This one could be the new Meta. Dev seems based and active. Community very strong. Narrative is very crazy too. ATH after ATH happening here. Check this out. https://dexscreener.com/xrpl/4c45444745524755590000000000000000000000.reuo2p65tfnhksxuietsjxufcyyiik83f5_xrp?s=35 Ledger Guy is a project inspired by the very first meme ever created on the internet, as well as the familiar face seen on the

22 Oct 2025, 13:50 UTC71 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @delugebuybotVideo

Binance on Sol Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 0.43 SOL ($79.87) 🔀 61 403 705.657 BNB 👤 14acsK...rqo5 | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $1 216 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events

22 Oct 2025, 11:19 UTCviews —

ULTIMATE CHAD CALLS pinned «$BNB ON SOL Binance On Solana BE7fpmN76XrihTE5q68sZrZZV6psTR3746oH52tLNNJv We will try to push this again today....Check This Out... 1K Mcap. Low cap. t.me/BINANCE_ON_SOL NFA : DYOR»

22 Oct 2025, 11:19 UTC92 viewsread 9 August 2026

$BNB ON SOL Binance On Solana BE7fpmN76XrihTE5q68sZrZZV6psTR3746oH52tLNNJv We will try to push this again today....Check This Out... 1K Mcap. Low cap. t.me/BINANCE_ON_SOL NFA : DYOR

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UltimateChadCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ULTIMATE CHAD CALLS” (@UltimateChadCalls), 107 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UltimateChadCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.