Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آموزش هک و امنیت| UltraSec

Channel

آموزش هک و امنیت| UltraSec

@UltraSecurity

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

80,501subscribers

-635 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001114832438
TypeChannel
Username@UltraSecurity
Descriptionاشکان مقدس | اولترا سیکیوریتی مرجع تخصصی هک و امنیت تماس با ادمین : @AmScan دوره های هک و امنیت Ultraamooz.com/shop اینستاگرام https://www.instagram.com/ultraamooz_
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 April 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UltraSecurity

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

80,50181,13680,818.56 August 2026 — 81,136 subscribers6 August 2026 — 81,110 subscribers7 August 2026 — 81,086 subscribers8 August 2026 — 81,050 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81,015 subscribers10 August 2026 — 80,961 subscribers11 August 2026 — 80,919 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,872 subscribers13 August 2026 — 80,810 subscribers14 August 2026 — 80,747 subscribers16 August 2026 — 80,677 subscribers17 August 2026 — 80,629 subscribers18 August 2026 — 80,604 subscribers19 August 2026 — 80,561 subscribers20 August 2026 — 80,533 subscribers22 August 2026 — 80,501 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80,406–81,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 05:1580,501-32
20 Aug 2026, 21:1580,533-28
19 Aug 2026, 20:2680,561-43
18 Aug 2026, 20:3480,604-25
17 Aug 2026, 17:2880,629-48
16 Aug 2026, 15:3780,677-70
14 Aug 2026, 20:2580,747-63
13 Aug 2026, 14:4980,810-62
12 Aug 2026, 11:3880,872-47
11 Aug 2026, 14:0580,919-42
10 Aug 2026, 15:4280,961-54
9 Aug 2026, 14:1481,015-35
8 Aug 2026, 15:2281,050-36
7 Aug 2026, 18:0281,086-24
6 Aug 2026, 20:5381,110-26
6 Aug 2026, 02:4581,136first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.26%
avg views ÷ 80,501 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,040
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held30 (27 June 202619 August 2026)
Views total65,510
Reactions total1,454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,110
Videos
165
Links
599

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
2m 43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,139 reactions across 30 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,51648.3%
95830.5%
🔥40212.8%
😁1554.94%
👎581.85%
😱230.733%
🤩220.701%
🎉50.159%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UltraSecurity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,990 views37 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔴 در حال ارسال گجت بلوایکس(BlueX) هستم برای دوستانی که سفارش داده بودن ❤

29👎5🔥3

17 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈3,120 views261 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🌕 باگ بانتی روی وب ۳ بهتره یا وب ۲؟ 🔴 خیلی ها میخوان باگ بانتی وب رو شروع بکنن اما آیا وب ۲ ارزش داره یا وب ۳؟ قراره توی ویسی که داریم خیلی کامل راجب این موضوع صحبت کنیم همچنین چالش هایی که داره و موضوع خیلی مهم نقد کردن درآمد که توی وب ۲ چالش زیاده داره اما توی وب ۳ بیشتر پلتفرم ها با کریپتو پرداخت میکنن :) بقیه اش هم توی ویس میگم 👍 👍 اگر تعداد لایک ها به ۵۰۰ تا برسه ویسش رو توی کانال قرار میدم 👍 @UltraSecurity

👍2497👎5

14 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC≈4,430 views24 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🔴 موجودی گجت BlueX فقط 20 عدد بود که تا الان 8 تاش فروش رفته فقط 12 تا دیگه ازش مونده

🔥183👎3

14 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈4,350 views28 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🎁 برای خرید گجت میتونید با کد تخفیف Bluex تخفیف بيشتري بگیرید و تا آخر امشب هم فعال خواهد بود

18😁5👎3🎉2

14 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈4,380 views41 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🙏 از همه شما ممنونم که اینقدر حمایت میکنید از گجت BlueX ❤️ ♦️ من نمیگم گجت ما از Flipper Zero بهتره ! اما فکر کنید سازنده Flipper Zero توی سایت Kick Starter نزدیک به دو میلیون دلار حمایت شده از سمت مردمش و بعدش گجت رو ساخته و عرضه کرده، اما ما با کمترین امکانات سخت افزاری و محدودیت همون امکانات بلوتوث هکینگ در Flipper Zero رو ساختیم، فرق اصلی اینه:) @UltraSecurity

38👎3

13 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈3,920 views19 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔵گجت سخت افزاری BlueX برای تست نفوذ بلوتوث (Bluetooth Hacking) 🔹معرفی گجت سخت افزاری بلوایکس (BlueX) گجت سخت افزاری بلوایکس (BlueX) از برد توسعه ESP32-DevKitC استفاده میکنه و توانایی اینو داره که روی بلوتوث حملات مختلقی انجام بده ، گجت فلیپرزیرو توی بحث بلوتوث حملاتی مثل BLE SPAM و Keyboard Spoof برای حملات HID و همچنین GATT Exploit رو داره و گجت BlueX هم تمامی این امکانات رو داره با همون دقت و قدرتی که توی فلیپر

18👎1

13 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈3,890 views29 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🌕 گجت سخت افزاری BlueX برای تست نفوذ بلوتوث (Bluetooth Hacking) چطوری ساخته شد؟ 🔴واقعا خوشحالم که این سومین گجت سخت افزاری هست که داریم تو حوزه هک و امنیت تولید میکنیم ، در گجت های قبلی GHOST و PULSE تجربیات خوبی به دست اومد و تصمیم گرفتم که ساخت یک گجت جدید رو شروع کنم، ایده ای که داشتم این بود که با کمترین امکانات سخت افزاری بتونم یک گجت برای تست نفوذ بلوتوث تولید کنم موضوعی که اونقدر خوب بهش پرداخته نشده اما استف

27👎2

10 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈5,420 views57 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

💎 بلاخره کارای بسته بندی گجت هم تموم شد و شما در نهایت با این بسته بندی گجت رو تحویل میگیرید 👍

🔥3810👍5👎4

9 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈5,540 views53 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔴 راجب قیمت گجت BlueX خیلی ها سوال کرده بودن، برای کسانی که قبلا توی دوره های ما شرکت کردن قیمتش میشه ۲ میلیون ۸۵۰ ، همیشه هوای بچه های قدیمی رو داریم:) برای کسانی که از ما دوره نخریدن با قیمت ۳ میلیون ۵۰۰ ارائه میشه ♦️ ظرفیت تولید گجت به شدت محدوده پس همین هفته آماده باشید که فروش باز میشه @UltraSecurity

34😁9👎6👍2🔥1😱1

8 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC≈5,560 views59 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔴 گجت سخت افزاری BlueX برای تست نفوذ بلوتوث، به مراحل پایانی رسید ♦️ خیلی سعی کردم همه چیز دقیق و درست و با کیفیت باشه تقریبا الان سه هفته هست یکسره درگیر کد نویسی هستم و طراحی گجت، تمامی پروژه رو دارم یکنفره پیش میبرم و به شدت سنگین بوده تا حالا، امیدوارم بازم بتونیم گجتی ارائه کنیم که در شأن و لول شما عزیزان و تمامی مردم ایران باشه ❤️ @UltraSecurity

50👍6🔥2👎1

8 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈5,220 views84 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Voice message

🎙چطوری کیف پول سخت افزاری Cold Card هک شد و 70 میلیون دلار به سرقت رفت؟ 👍 از همگی ممنونم بابت حمایت بی نظیری که داشتید❤️ قراره یه نگاهی به آسیب پذیری های سطح Firmware داشته‌باشیم که مطمنم براتون جالبه @UltraSecurity

84

3 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈8,050 views697 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🌕چطوری کیف پول های بیت کوین (Bitcoin)هک میشن ؟ 🔴 یه خبری اومده که یک هکر تونسته توی ۴۱ دقیقه کیف پول سخت افزاری بیت کوین رو خالی بکنه و ۷۰ میلیون دلار زده به جیب:) 🫆 حالا سوالی که پیش میاد اینه که چطوری این شخص هکر تونسته کیف پول سخت افزاری بیت کوین رو هک بکنه؟ روشش خیلی جالب بوده.... 👍 اگر تعداد لایک ها به ۵۰۰ تا برسه ویسش رو توی کانال قرار میدم 👍 @UltraSecurity

👍66919👎4🔥3😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @UltraSecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTCAnonymous Poll480 voters

نسخه های محدودی از این گجت ساخته میشه، کسانی که میخوان اعلام کنن💪

  1. 👍 من هستم44%
  2. شاید بعدا خریداری کردم60%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 276,796 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش هک و امنیت| UltraSec” (@UltraSecurity), 80,501 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UltraSecurity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.