Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ꮋᴇиɜʙᴇдᴀнный ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋий

Channel

Ꮋᴇиɜʙᴇдᴀнный ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋий

@UnknownEnglish

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,081subscribers

-147 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001284261822
TypeChannel
Username@UnknownEnglish
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/UnknownEnglish

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,0816,2286,154.57 August 2026 — 6,228 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,228 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,220 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,210 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,201 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,195 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,181 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,176 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,156 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,176 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,174 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,164 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,155 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,132 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,102 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,081 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,059–6,250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 09:216,081-21
5 Oct 2026, 18:356,102-30
28 Sept 2026, 10:406,132-23
18 Sept 2026, 14:396,155-9
14 Sept 2026, 12:156,164-10
11 Sept 2026, 00:406,174-2
6 Sept 2026, 11:396,176+20
2 Sept 2026, 04:246,156-7
29 Aug 2026, 18:596,163-13
26 Aug 2026, 11:486,176-5
23 Aug 2026, 19:396,181-14
20 Aug 2026, 01:446,195-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:386,201-9
13 Aug 2026, 00:346,210-10
10 Aug 2026, 04:546,220-8
7 Aug 2026, 01:156,228no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:036,228first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4741.2%
👍3934.2%
🤔2118.4%
🤩54.39%
👏21.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC284 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

QUESTION Why is it correct to say "Thirty pounds is a lot of weight to lose," even though pounds seem plural? What's the rule here? It is not helpful to think in terms of “rules”. There is a logical relationship involved, and if you understand the logical relationship you will understand why the third-person singular form of the verb is used. “Thirty pounds” is a quantity and as such it is uncountable. It is measur…

🤩4❤1👍1🤔1

2 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC437 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

QUESTION Is "according to me" correct? There is nothing wrong with it grammatically, but it is logically awkward. We use “according to” only when we want to present some other source as the authority for what we are saying. If we are the source of the information, then it is not “according to”, since we are speaking on our own authority. If I know that something is true, I can say with confidence that it is true an…

👍3❤1🤔1

31 Jul 2026, 04:28 UTC419 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @english_academysPoll

«Ubiquitous» - значит ❓

  1. Скрытый и недоступный для глаз24%
  2. Устаревший и вышедший из употребления25%
  3. Вездесущий, встречающийся повсеместно38%
  4. Сложный для понимания14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤2👍2

28 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTCviews —

Ꮋᴇиɜʙᴇдᴀнный ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋий pinned «❓ Ищете надежного репетитора по иностранным языкам? ❗️Мы создали площадку Very English Репетитор (very-english.ru), где собраны лучшие квалифицированные преподаватели. ❓ Почему стоит выбрать именно нас: ▪️Быстро: регистрация в два клика. ▪️Выгодно: никаких…»

28 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC603 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SALUBRIOUS səˈluːbrɪəs целебный, целительный, здоровый, полезный для здоровья •the salubrious mountain air and water — целебный горный воздух и вода •salubrious food — полезная еда •salubrious exercise — полезное упражнение •Fresh air and exercise are always salubrious.▫️Свежий воздух и физические упражнения всегда благотворно сказываются на здоровье. •'Salubrious'! That's just the word I was looking for.▫️"Целебны…

👍2

27 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC567 viewsread 12 August 2026

❓ Ищете надежного репетитора по иностранным языкам? ❗️Мы создали площадку Very English Репетитор (very-english.ru), где собраны лучшие квалифицированные преподаватели. ❓ Почему стоит выбрать именно нас: ▪️Быстро: регистрация в два клика. ▪️Выгодно: никаких комиссий ни до, ни после. ▪️Напрямую: все контакты преподавателей доступны сразу после авторизации. ⚡️ Переходите на very-english.ru и выбирайте своего идеальн…

26 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC583 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

EFFACE ɪˈfeɪs стирать, изглаживать, вычеркивать, принижать, затмевать, превосходить •the image on the coin is effaced — изображение на монете стёрлось •efface the boundaries — уничтожить границы; стереть границы •efface from mind — вычёркивать из памяти •Time cannot efface the memory of that day.▫️Время не может стереть память о том дне. •Nothing could efface her grief.▫️Ничто не могло стереть её горе. •She effaced…

❤5👍1

23 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC624 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

DEIGN deɪn соблаговолить, снисходить, изволить, удостаивать •deign no reply — не удостоить ответом •He did not deign an answer.▫️Он не снизошёл до ответа. •He did not deign to speak.▫️Он не соизволил заговорить. •I wouldn't deign to answer that absurd accusation.▫️Я бы не удостоил ответом столь нелепые обвинения. ⭕️Unknown

❤6👍2🤩1

20 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC619 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

FULMINATE ˈfʊlmɪneɪt громить, взрываться, взрывать, сверкать, греметь, изливать гнев •fulminate against — метать громы и молнии •fulminate anathemas — сыпать проклятиями; осыпать бранью •fulminate orders — издавать громовые приказы •Many people are fulminating against the cruelty of blood sports.▫️Многие люди негодуют по поводу жестокости охотников. •The editorial fulminated against the proposed tax increase.▫️Реда…

👍7❤1

19 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC548 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Would it be grammatically correct to use the word "would" twice in a sentence? For example: “I would not be surprised if he would win”. It isn’t wrong in English to use would twice in a sentence, but in standard constructions a would in the if-clause (“… if he would win.”) should be avoided. In your example, the acceptable form is “I would not be surprised if he won,” keeping would in the main clause and using a pas…

👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @UnknownEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 04:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz609 voters

«Ubiquitous» - значит ❓

  1. Скрытый и недоступный для глаз24%
  2. Устаревший и вышедший из употребления25%
  3. Вездесущий, встречающийся повсеместно38%
  4. Сложный для понимания14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VeryEnglish ☕️ | Очень по-английски
@veryenglink · 56,157
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
🇬🇧 Learn English 🇬🇧
@ieltstoeflcefrr · 65,507
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Английский в фразах
@EngInPhrases · 20,525
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 September 2026
Английский на слух
@EnglishByEar · 41,545
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
English Academy🎓 | Академия Английского языка
@english_academys · 28,920
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
5 слов на английском
@anglyskyi_yazyk · 83,136
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
Вечерний English
@anglyskyb · 19,486
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 October 2026
English Time🇬🇧
@anglyskya · 19,872
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ꮋᴇиɜʙᴇдᴀнный ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋий” (@UnknownEnglish), 6,081 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnknownEnglish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.