INPLAY. ✅ 2+ fouls in 8/11 starts, already on 1 & had 2 in the last game vs Liverpool.

Channel
@ValueBetSpotter
@VBSTelegram
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,446subscribers
-1,056 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001330654971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VBSTelegram |
| Description | Join our free £250 cash competition every week 👉 ValueBetSpotter.com 🏈 NFL: https://t.me/VBSNFLTelegram 18+ | play safe & be gamble aware. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VBSTelegram |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:37 | 32,446 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 32,454 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:52 | 32,468 | -27 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 32,495 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:47 | 32,510 | -19 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:47 | 32,529 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 32,547 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 32,542 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 32,547 | -16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 32,563 | -21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 32,584 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:48 | 32,599 | -14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 32,613 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:51 | 32,618 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 32,620 | -22 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 32,642 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 32,651 | -12 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 32,663 | -27 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 32,690 | -27 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 32,717 | first reading |
Engagement
227 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 155 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.6%
- avg views ÷ 32,446 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,040
- 85 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 85
- of 227 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 227 (10 July 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 513,180 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Nov 2026, 19:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,410
- Videos
- ≈22
- Links
- ≈661
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.64%
- 6 of 227 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 6,360
- over 6 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 6,500
- over 221 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 227 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 1 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
✅ That didn’t take long did it. 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
🚀 Two fun superboosts to track alongside our 11/1 bet here. ✅ Alexander Isak shots on target: 1, 2, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2 📚 PaddyPower ✅ Kai Havertz shots on target: 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2 📚 SkyBet All stats include super sub. Good luck if you’re on! 🚀
🚀 Telegram exclusive, be quick. 😍 HUGE 11/1 VALUE BUILDER SPOTTED! Back this Liverpool vs Arsenal bet, here 👇 bit.ly/LivArsBOOST ✅ Liverpool are unbeaten at Anfield vs Arsenal since 2012. An unbelievable record, unbeaten at home in 13/13 games. ✅ Ezri Konsa fouls won vs Liverpool: 1, 4, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4 ✅ Liverpool have had 3+ corners in 29/30 home league games. ✅ Arsenal have had 3+ corners in 28/30 away league …
📅 Spurs vs C Palace 💰 £20 returns £59 ✅ Daichi Kamada has been fouled in 17/20 games. ✅ Omar Marmoush has committed 1+ foul in 16/20 games. ✅ Spurs have had 5+ goal kicks in 18/20 games. Fouls breezed in here, red card destroyed the goal kicks sadly. Good luck if you’re on! 🚀
😍 YET ANOTHER FULL HOUSE! ✅ 3 bets on this game, 3 wins. We can’t stop winning, get in there. 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
😍 But the main winner here at 7/4, get in there. ✅ LAVIA 2 FOULS WON! 🤝 Shoutout StatManBettor on Twitter for the assist here too. 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
👀 Winners galore here, get in there. ✅ Chelsea to score first. 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
👊 Feel this is far too high in the early kick off. Lavia fouls won with super sub: 4, 2, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 2, 2 Good luck if you’re on! 🚀
🚀 Two superboosts we like the look of here. ✅ Bryan Mbuemo shots on target: 1, 0, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 4, 1 (PaddyPower). ✅ Chelsea have scored first in 8/11 games in all competitions (Bet365). Good luck if you’re on! 👊
🚀 12/1 Telegram exclusive! 📅 Everton vs Newcastle 👇 Add this to your betslip, here. bit.ly/ThursdayBOOST Found a seriously bizarre but consistent pattern between Newcastle & Everton here. Odds have already dropped from 14/1 here so have to post early. ✅ Newcastle, incredibly, have had the most corners in each half in 8 of their last 10 games vs Everton. ✅ In the last 10 head-to-heads, Newcastle have had a massive …
😍😍😍 £10 TO £100 CHALLENGE IS COMPLETE!!!!! ✅ You’re all waking up £100 better off than yesterday. 👊 Get in there, worth the slower payouts for prices this good sometimes. Such an easy challenge win. We’re going again, don’t miss bet one, join here 👇 bit.ly/DabbleFREE10 Search ValueBetSpotter & follow us so you don’t miss a single bet. 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 #ad, 18+, New Customer Offer, T&Cs apply, gambleaware.or
Showing the 12 most recent of 227 posts we hold for @VBSTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@VBSTelegram edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 26 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 26 October 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@wizardcfc · 8,856#1
@TipsterCharlie_TC · 20,726#2
@Winnerscb · 5,099#3
@DWbetsFREE · 3,061#4
@GMKFootball · 5#5
@fba_bets · 2,597#6
@jami3betting · 1,226#7
@TipsterCasey · 1,572#8
@BFMPlayerProps · 1,526#9
@hbettingfree · 2,913#10
@pubpunts · 863#11
@dbspotstrends · 1,059#12
@JamieWoodsTips · 412#13
@jahtipsfree · 609 (as read 16 September 2026)#14
@TippoBets · 556#15
@GoatPredictionsTips · 2,577#16
@lemzyltd · 25,126#17
@thecashcornerr · 1,408#18
@stevekevasbets · 214#19
@SP_Tips · 473#20
@BettingGod06 · 16,778#21
@thesmartbettorsb · 11,127#22
@hsmfree · 3,678#23
@TipsterCharlieAlts · 2,105#24
@R10Bets · 757#25
@MaccaFreeTips · 4,395#26
@dylbets · 903 (as read 16 September 2026)#27
@AlcatrazBets · 1,368#28
@OddsNotifer · 1,513#29
@BFMFreeOlds · 1,544#30
@sautrix · 440#31
@ShootersTips · 3,119#32
@pintotennis · 498#33
@pikarillo · 3,725#34
@ApuestasGuruES · 2,863#35
@XEQBOtipster · 296#36
@FinnishBabushhh · 2,331#37
@footypickz · 3,675#38
@MaldiniBets10 · 2,088#39
@tipsertbet · 576#40
@coco3x3 · 454#41
@LkTips7 · 3,430 (as read 16 September 2026)#42
@KinginBoxing · 2,522#43
@Zipperedbets · 351#44
@TaivoTipster · 1,775#45
@sbp_free · 804#46
@vf_tips · 13,277 (as read 16 September 2026)#47
@blackbetapuestas · 397#48
@canaltarjeteros · 2,701#49
@Manchapicks · 1,508#50
@golazobets_apuestas · 1,011#51
@high5BettingFREE · 686#52
@picksanubis · 1,620#53
@mclovintipster10 · 5,741#54
@thesmartbettorxxx · 4,934#55
@NBAInjuries · 104,422#56
@exotic_tips · 882#57
@TheRealChePicks · 6,202#58
@arbitragebetting4 · 3,939#59
@tipstertrust · 10,307#60
@andreaskloft · 2,513#61
@Olimpo_Apuestas · 365#62
@ApuestasTarjetass · 2,865 (as read 16 September 2026)#63
@SportguruToday · 748#64
@AF_Tipster · 937#65
@dv_tips · 2,574#66
@oddsnotifierdemo · 1,957#67
@fliptheslip · 899#68
@TipsterCharlieCombatSports · 1,814#69
@MarshaladaBetting · 3,136#70
@fabiamanbets · 396#71
@apuestasgbeytenis · 3,353#72
@nygaardbetting · 369#73
@slavstipsgroup · 3,738#74
@GolDeUlloa · 8,401#75
@foofighterR6S_bets · 422#76
@tennismasterrpicks · 10,751#77
@TheTipmunk · 109#78
@anonymousbet5 · 5,391#79
@davidbettingprops · 159 (as read 16 September 2026)#80
@DodoTips · 1,071#81
@thegeniustips · 1,060#82
@guatefut · 1#83
@paivatipsss · 4#84
@ScamaZZa · 673 (as read 16 September 2026)#85
@ResellBetsLord · 2,910#86
@Grupo6freeCV · 3,396#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lemzyltd · 25,126
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@ValueBetSpotter” (@VBSTelegram), 32,446 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VBSTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.