Channel name was changed to «|rest¡ ⠔ ⊹ 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗱 。ᘎ»

Channel
|archive¡ ⠔ ⊹ 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗱 。ᘎ
@VLab_msmp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003607440377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VLab_msmp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VLab_msmp |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 8 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 11 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 13 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 14 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 17 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 16 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 17 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5233474098931213882 | 9 | 31.0% | |
| custom 5425117502478771731 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 24.1% | |
| custom 5354859469673102084 | 3 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5197484201431043198 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 3.45% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
❌ Ах да, забыл упомянуть: прошлое фото было сделано две недели назад, всё никак не находил времени поделиться им. А если говорить о насущном, то пару дней назад я тоже "гулял" и сделал пару фотографий. Одну из них также прикреплю здесь. 🤩🤩🤩 ❌❌⁞16.07⁞
✍1custom 52334740989312138821custom 54251175024787717311
Sticker, posted without a caption
❌ Хотел бы поделиться тем, что в последнее время бываю в неплохих местах, пусть и по работе. Недавно как раз ходил к горам на границе шестой и седьмой зон и, думаю, даже могу прикрепить одну фотографию, похожую на ту, что я делал для отчёта. На удивление, с помощью этого устройства можно делать фотографии даже легче, чем с помощью фотокамеры, да ещё и в цвете... 🤩🤩🤩 ❌❌⁞16.07⁞
✍1custom 52334740989312138821custom 54251175024787717311
Sticker, posted without a caption
❌ Сегодня ходил сдавать ежемесячный отчёт и нечаянно разговорился с принимающим. Он оказался на удивление неплохим человеком, к тому же пришёл даже раньше меня. Он немного рассказал о том, что творится в компании. В целом всё как обычно: появилось много новых сотрудников, последние пару месяцев компания проводила масштабный набор стажёров, а ещё пара учёных, работавших с моими исследованиями, не выходят на работу у…
custom 52334740989312138821custom 53548594696731020841custom 54251175024787717311
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩🤩 Войд кивнул. ❌➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ – Не называй меня так. ❌➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Пусть учёному и не нужны были советы и предположения Джона, но халат и правда был теперь в ужасном состоянии. Смотря на него, ни малейшего желания отстирывать это не было, и единственным вариантом оставалось сжечь его... ❌➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ И вот наконец гость соизволил уйти. Войд хотел было поднять руку, отвечая на прощание Джона, но быстро одумался, отдёрнув её…
custom 51974842014310431981custom 52334740989312138821custom 54251175024787717311
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩🤩 Войд молчал чуть ли не несколько минут, игнорируя напоминания Джона. Он перебирал в голове правила, меры предосторожности, грядущие эксперименты и прочие секреты, скрытые в кабинетах лаборатории. Наконец в голове сформировались все "правила посещения". Войд вздохнул и начал "рассказ": ❌➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ – Я согласен. Но только при некоторых условиях, которые ты сейчас выслушаешь... ❌➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Он говорил минут десять, д…
✍1custom 52334740989312138821custom 54251175024787717311
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VLab_msmp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“|archive¡ ⠔ ⊹ 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗱 。ᘎ” (@VLab_msmp), 8 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VLab_msmp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.