Nyang Ko Anton joing

Channel
VOXEOM
@VOXEOM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,512subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003742219155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VOXEOM |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VOXEOM |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 3,512 | +157 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 3,355 | -61 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 3,416 | +89 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 3,327 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 3,341 | -58 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 3,399 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 3,400 | -49 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 3,449 | -21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 3,470 | -18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 3,488 | +35 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 3,453 | -29 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 3,482 | -23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 3,505 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 3,514 | first reading |
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| custom 6302958665448035959 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 25.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝓱ave u ever dream about the 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘩 sky, your skin turns into the colour of your 𝓈ℴ𝓊𝓁 and a 𝕓𝕖𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕪 marks that glitch prettily every 6 hour? if your answer is 𝙮𝙚𝙨 ꒰(*.. )🔮 ㅤㅤㅤcome through! 𝓭ear 𝚙.𝚘.𝚗.𝚢 ♡ ⸼ ଂ ㅤㅤㅤ·/ᐠ > ˕ <マ ₊˚⊹♡ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Nyang keonho nyang keonho~
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ (+88 CUE) Call. 📞 🎱 SHOTS / هدف ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
🏆1
Sticker, posted without a caption
I’m out, thanks
This or That
- Choosing19%
- Being chosen81%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
This or That
- Distance makes stronger69%
- Distance never works38%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Fight for love28%
- Know when to leave78%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Fall first48%
- Fall harder57%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Public affection52%
- Private romance71%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Listener67%
- Storyteller50%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @VOXEOM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
This or That
- Choosing19%
- Being chosen81%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
This or That
- Distance makes stronger69%
- Distance never works38%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Fight for love28%
- Know when to leave78%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Fall first48%
- Fall harder57%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Public affection52%
- Private romance71%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
This or That
- Listener67%
- Storyteller50%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@VOXEOMS · 2010 postsFLIP IT, KICK IT!
@FLIPCREWS · 131 postFree left.
@ThrenodySect · 5801 postCalyrian's archive.
@calyrians · 101 postchaosteean's
@chaosteeans · 171 post[DISBANDED] 𝓓oveian's : wings of a dove🪽
@doveians · 7891 postleesorè diary-tales!
@leesorefiles · 111 postLoleeans! 𖢷
@loleeans · 3,1211 post♥️
@yugloss · 331 post◌* 𓂃˖˳· yuhα:gloss 🫖♥
@yuhagloss · 3,2431 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@BBOYNEXTZ · 1,3681 postBonheur Of Haeum.
@BonHaeum · 1,4551 post🎱 HUESTON هيوستون
@HUESTONs · 2,0091 postLOSTSEANS.
@LOSTSEANS · 3,8371 postPHUWIN-HOOD: The Home Of Quiet Manuscripts.
@PHUWINHOOD · 5,7811 postREBELEOM: Electric Sirens.
@REBELEOM · 4,4731 postSCREOM
@SCREOM · 1,8831 postTHE-KEONSUNICLUB
@THEKEONSUNICLUB · 2,5251 postどーる// PUCHANZ.CO : 𝘢 𝘱𝘶𝘭𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘪𝘹𝘦𝘭𝘴 💧👾 ˖˟
@puchanz · 2,6631 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Riouschive · 814 postsAnadorée. 📁💗
@spillanadorees · 1813 postskeeans’
@keeansFTW · 63 postsCORTIS’ COMEBACK 🆙⚠️🔍
@cortisscomeback · 22 postsFLIP IT, KICK IT!
@FLIPCREWS · 132 postsGEONIAN ARCHIVE
@GEONIANS · 32 postsFILE$
@VOXEOMS · 202 posts𝒜 llurora⋆˚꩜。
@allurora · 2,0231 postAUGUST’s
@augustproperties · 11 post[HOLD SFS] BADTZLEØ : LIVING OF CARTOON CHAOS.
@BADZTLEO · 2,5831 postCORTISFESS!
@cortisfess · 9,2881 postCORTIS #365TUNEOFCORTIS
@CortisProject · 1,5851 postCORTIS UPDATE
@CORTISUPDATE · 82,3581 postDaishua Archive
@DaisyShua · 111 postDUNKSEAN [HOLD SFS]
@DUNKSEAN · 1,5511 postHYEVION'S ARCHIVE
@Hyevions · 131 postJameist Archive
@Jameists · 301 post𝗷𝗲𝗲-𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲.𝗹𝗼𝗴! ☘︎ ݁˖
@jeemcore · 101 post𝙹𝚄𝙿𝙰𝚆𝚂 🐈 @VAORUE
@Jupaws · 2,0131 postMartin Park
@Martinparka · 11 postSCREOM's Archive
@SCREOMS · 141 postla brisa costera.
@soleeans · 131 post[PAGUY] THE ODYSSEANS: Scions of Unseen Fate.
@TheOdysseans · 11,8341 post𝚆𝙾𝙽𝙴𝙻𝚈𝚂: Chair, Chat (&) Cheers! 𖢷
@WONELYS · 3,0131 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@username · 1,320,3224 postsCHADZUMI: HOLD SFS.
@CHADZUMI · 1,9041 postCØRPHALT — MOTORS VICIOUS
@CorPhalt · 3,0481 post(REST) EDΛINORΛCΞ.
@edainorace · 1,0491 postEOMFLARE
@EOMFLARE · 4,1671 postHOVOID: A Requiem for the One-Eyed.
@HOVOIDS · 1,7441 postHYUCKRUST: Built to Run
@hyuckrust · 1,6361 post𝙹𝚄𝙿𝙰𝚆𝚂 🐈 @VAORUE
@Jupaws · 2,0131 postDISBAND. 𝘭𝘰𝘵𝘶𝘴𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘯. ‧₊˚ 🌸 ๑ “beneath lotus skies.” ♡
@lotusrmen · 1,0541 post[HOLD SFS] 𝘖𝘝𝘝𝘚𝘐𝘙𝘌 : MEOVV DESIRE.
@OVVSIRE · 1,2961 post[REST] RYUJΞAN̈S. 🎱
@RyuOnJeans · 2,3351 postTHE-KEONSUNICLUB
@THEKEONSUNICLUB · 2,5251 postThe Depth Of WONMARINE.
@wonmarine · 1,8901 postYuphony 🩷
@yuphony · 1,8981 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VOXEOM” (@VOXEOM), 3,512 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VOXEOM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.