Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🗣🧠❌️ViolanTuCerebro🗣🧠❌️

Channel

🗣🧠❌️ViolanTuCerebro🗣🧠❌️

@VTCoficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,175subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001532239808
TypeChannel
Username@VTCoficial
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VTCoficial

Growth

2,1512,1852,1686 August 2026 — 2,151 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,151 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,159 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,166 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,171 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,173 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,178 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,185 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,181 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,175 subscribers2,1756 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,146–2,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:012,175-6
31 Aug 2026, 15:532,181-4
28 Aug 2026, 10:252,185+7
25 Aug 2026, 10:072,178+5
22 Aug 2026, 16:042,173+2
19 Aug 2026, 10:172,171+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:272,170+4
13 Aug 2026, 11:172,166+7
10 Aug 2026, 05:002,159+8
6 Aug 2026, 18:302,151no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:202,151first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 19s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8337.1%
💯3917.4%
💩229.82%
😁177.59%
👍156.70%
👏114.91%
🤬104.46%
73.13%
🤮73.13%
👌41.79%
👎31.34%
🏆20.893%
🍌10.446%
😈10.446%
🙈10.446%
🤨10.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC169 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PilarBaselgaPhoto

Aquí se puede ver con claridad que España controla el Estrecho de Gibraltar, y que los anglosionistas (EEUU, GB e Israel) quieren controlarlo porque con el bloqueo de Ormuz y BAb el Mandeb, están fritos. Necesitan IMPERATIVAMENTE controla el Estrecho de Gibraltar para poder circular con el petróleo y el gas, tanto desde el mar Rojo como del mar Negro Para ello, España va a ser obligada a ceder sus aguas territoriale

🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC232 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DesdeEigerPhoto

"Nosotros, sin embargo, ni tenemos hijos ni casa ni coche. En propiedad no tenemos nada más que un iPhone y una estantería del Ikea de treinta euros porque no podemos tener más y ese es nuestro imperativo y es ma­­terial. Pero nos autoconvencemos pensando que la li­­ber­­tad era prescindir de críos y casa y coche porque «quién sabe dónde estaré mañana». Nos han hecho creer que saber dónde estaremos mañana es una impo

💯7🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC256 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @VenganzaV5Video

Por si aún no sabes por dónde va la cosa. 2010 | Barbara Spectre, judía proinmigración masiva tercermundista a Europa, fundadora de organización judía Paideia, en Estocolmo, Suecia: «Europa no será más esas sociedades monolíticas que fueron durante el último siglo. Los judíos estarán al centro de todo eso.» Fuente: Voluntas

🔥4💩3

5 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC280 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤬3🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC173 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @elchicotristeVideo

Traslado de hoy de inmigrantes ilegales desde Ceuta hasta Andalucía.

🤬7🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC240 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @libresysoberanosFSPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥8

4 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC223 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @herQlesPhoto

🇪🇸🇲🇦 | #ÚltimaHora El Gobierno anuncia una partida extraordinaria de 25 millones para atender a los MENAs que han entrado en Ceuta en los últimos cuatro días.

💩8🔥6

4 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC216 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DesdeEigerVideo

Lo de este país de SUBNORMALES es inenarrable.

💩8🔥5

3 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC258 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @libresysoberanosFSPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯14🔥21🤨1

2 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC295 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @elcadenazoVideo

🇲🇦 🇪🇸 Más imágenes de inmigrantes saltando de camiones del Ejército para no ser deportados a Marruecos. t.me/tsanoticias

🔥6

2 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC364 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇪🇸🇲🇦 | Ceuta hace unas horas: las imágenes que desmienten la vuelta a la normalidad de la que habla el Gobierno.

🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @VTCoficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🗣🧠❌️ViolanTuCerebro🗣🧠❌️” (@VTCoficial), 2,175 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VTCoficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.