Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for haawall

Channel

haawall

@VT_marketsiraq

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

-9,014 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002288676845
TypeChannel
Usernames@Haawall @VT_marketsiraq
Created23 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/VT_marketsiraq

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

29,0774,539.56 August 2026 — 9,030 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,027 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,022 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,039 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,019 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,996 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,997 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,967 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,966 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,970 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,964 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,965 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,936 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,888 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,743 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,695 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,899 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,889 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,884 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,077 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,055 subscribers29 October 2026 — 2 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,959 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,959 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16 subscribers166 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -9,014. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 10:0616-8,943
3 Nov 2026, 04:568,959no change
3 Nov 2026, 04:478,959+8,957
29 Oct 2026, 07:402-9,053
26 Oct 2026, 00:269,055-22
22 Oct 2026, 15:499,077+193
18 Oct 2026, 23:308,884-5
16 Oct 2026, 08:018,889-10
13 Oct 2026, 10:168,899+204
7 Oct 2026, 01:198,695-48
30 Sept 2026, 07:358,743-145
19 Sept 2026, 14:408,888-48
15 Sept 2026, 03:008,936-29
11 Sept 2026, 08:398,965+1
6 Sept 2026, 12:578,964-6
1 Sept 2026, 18:128,970+4
29 Aug 2026, 19:258,966-1
26 Aug 2026, 10:538,967-30
23 Aug 2026, 04:458,997+1
19 Aug 2026, 20:178,996first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 23 February 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1618.8%
avg views ÷ 16 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held24 (23 February 2025 – 29 October 2026)
Views total777
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
51s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3976.5%
💔611.8%
🔥611.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2025 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

29 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC164 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

متمانەترین کۆمپانیا لە سەرتاسەری عیراق و کوردستان..📊

🔥5

Signed VTmarkets

28 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC344 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026

بازاری فۆریکس لەگەل ئیمە📊. کێ حەز دەکات کاریک بکات تەنها خێری زۆر زیاتر بی لە زەرەر فۆریکس لەگەل ئێمە📊🔥 https://www.vglobaltrader.com/trade-now/?affid=NzQ0ODQyMg==&invitecode=bstn9UOb

❤4

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

28 Oct 2026, 13:54 UTC269 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

✨ کۆمپانیای VT Markets ✨ یەکێکە لە کۆمپانیا جیهانیە سەرەکییەکان لە بواری بازرگانی فۆرێکس، و بەو تایبەتمەندییانەی خوارەوە دیاری دەکرێت: • ✅ مۆڵەتی نێودەوڵەتی و سیستەمی چاودێری متمانەپێکراو. • ✅ جیاوازی نرخ (سپرید) نزم و جێبەجێکردنی خێرا. 🌌 • ✅ زیاتر لە 1000 ئامرازێکی دارایی بۆ بازرگانی (فۆرێکس، ئاماژەکان، زیوەکان، وزە، پشکەکان). • ✅ پلاتفۆرمەکانی MT4 و MT5 بۆ نوێژکاران و شارەزایان. • ✅ خێرایی پارەدانان و پارەراکێش…

❤2🔥1

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

14 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC≈1,490 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1

ئادمینم ئەوێت بۆ پۆست کردن♥️. @S4XFANs 🫰.

❤4💔2

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

13 Jul 2026, 23:07 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1

adminm awe ke weste chat ka ♥️. @S4XFANs

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

7 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,900 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1Video

من دوێنی سپید بووم💔🇵🇹.

💔4❤3

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

4 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,960 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

21 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,860 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1

کەناڵ بۆ فرۆشتن (بێ مەعمەلە) 📌 @Hawalx1 📌 @Haawall 📌 @HUB69SX 📌 @roshtwm40 🔹 هەموویان بۆ فرۆشتنن. 🔹 بێ مەعمەلە و ڕاستەوخۆ لەگەڵ خاوەنەکە. 📩 بۆ کرین و زانیاری زیاتر پەیوەندی بکەن: @Hawaalll

❤4

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

15 Jun 2026, 11:12 UTC≈1,790 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1

کەناڵی 1.5K هەمووی کورد هەیە بە15هەزار بۆ کرین @Hawaallll

❤4

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

13 Jun 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,660 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1Photo

سایتیکی جیاواز ئاسیا ئاسیا بگۆرە👈 FIB کۆرەک بگۆرە بۆ👈 FIB کۆرەک بگۆرە بۆ 👈Fastpay کۆرەک بگۆرە بۆ 👈FIB ئاسیا بگۆرە بۆ 👈Fastpay تەنها لەریگای سایتەکەمان https://hawal.online 🔥.👈

❤2

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

11 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,170 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1Photo

� خزمەتگوزاری سۆشیال میدیا بە نرخێکی گونجاو 🚀 ✅ ئەندامی تێلگرام ✅ ڤیوی تیکتۆک ✅ لایکی تیکتۆک ✅ فۆلۆوەر بۆ سۆشیال میدیا ✅ بۆتی تێلگرام ✅ کەناڵی تێلگرام ئامادە بۆ فرۆشتن ⚡ خێرا و متمانەپێکراو 💰 نرخەکان گونجاون 📩 بۆ زانیاری زیاتر و داواکاری، پەیوەندیمان پێوە بکە @Hawaallll 🔥 ئەگەر دەتەوێت گەشە بە هەژمارەکەت بدەیت، ئێستا پەیوەندی بکە! �

❤1

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

10 Jun 2026, 17:18 UTC889 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawalx1Photo

🔥 ئەندامی ڕاستەقینەی تێلگرام بە باشترین نرخ 🔥 ✅ ئەندامی ڕاستەقینە و چالاک ✅ زیادکردنی خێرا و سەلامەت ✅ گونجاو بۆ چەنەل و گرووپەکان ✅ نرخی گونجاو و خزمەتگوزاری متمانەپێکراو دەتەوێت چەنەلەکەت گەورەتر بێت و باوەڕی خەڵک پەیدا بکات؟ ئێستا پەیوەندیمان پێوە بکە. @Hawaallll بۆ داواکردن و وەرگرتنی زانیاری زیاتر.

❤3

Signed 𓏺︎︎︎ ࣪‹𓏺𝙷𝙰𝚆𝙰𝙻𝙻›𓏺⊰🕸️

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @VT_marketsiraq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“haawall” (@VT_marketsiraq), 16 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VT_marketsiraq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.