📌Hello to our regular friends Thank you for following our channels over the years We have prepared two special and different channels for you Each channel has different content, but it is better for you to join both channels to have access to new and different videos -------------------------------------------------------- 🔥Hola a nuestros amigos habituales. Gracias por seguirnos en nuestros canales durante todos e…

Channel
Valentina94
@Valentina948
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,942subscribers
+609 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001944646559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Valentina948 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Valentina948 |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 20,942 | +22 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 20,920 | +31 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 20,889 | +6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 20,883 | +14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 20,869 | +34 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 20,835 | +61 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 20,774 | +29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 20,745 | +13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:32 | 20,732 | +15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:28 | 20,717 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 20,704 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 20,696 | +34 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 20,662 | +22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 20,640 | +24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 20,616 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 20,629 | +15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 20,614 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 20,593 | +55 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 20,538 | +38 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 20,500 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.9%
- avg views ÷ 20,942 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,280
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 November 2025 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 15s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
🔻You can find the rest of the channels with the help of the link below. Various new models. 📌Puedes encontrar el resto de los canales en el enlace de abajo. Varios modelos nuevos 🔻🔻🔻 @ferows @morfi @ferows
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Valentina948. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@AlejitaRios · 9,6461 postAndyRugerio Andy Rugerio
@AndyRugeriobot · 7,6361 postClaarakush
@Claarakushof · 8,2441 postDorismar
@Dorismar · 13,5691 postGemmastw
@Gemmastw · 22,7791 postJennirb
@Jennirb · 1,4641 postKarolRosado
@KarolRosado · 9,5641 postKeylaChicaiza Keyla Chicaiza
@KeylaChicaiza8 · 6,1641 postLakikis
@Lakikis · 5,4511 postLilith Regia LilithRegia
@LilithRegia · 15,3581 postLunadiaz Luna diaz
@Lunadiaz · 7,9271 postMaferShof mafer mafersho
@MaferShof_mafer · 5,9531 postManuelaQuintero Manuela Quintero
@ManuelaQuinterobot · 8,4181 postZuarifit
@Zuarifit · 3,0261 postaylin criss aylincriss
@aylincrissonly · 18,2981 postbrendagege
@brendagege · 4,7531 postcelialora celia lora
@celialora6 · 6,9481 postdelettraaoficial
@delettraaoficial · 11,3131 postgraciebon
@graciebonlady · 4,1151 postimskirby
@imskirbybot · 12,9511 postjanicenichole
@janicenichol · 5,8361 postjefaooficial
@jefaooficial · 11,0851 postladydusha lady dusha
@ladydusha5 · 7,6621 postlorenanerdygirl
@lorenanerdygirl9 · 5,6111 postluzcelina
@luzcelinabot · 3,3081 postnetxuu
@netxuu · 10,9541 postMelaniepavola Melanie pavola
@pavola · 17,2721 postrosslyn
@rosslyn · 4,0681 postvaleruky
@valeruky · 3,7081 postyazflexi
@yazflex · 5,4561 postzowip
@zowip · 3,1201 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@jefaooficial · 11,0859 postsGemmastw
@Gemmastw · 22,7796 postsAlejitaRios
@AlejitaRios · 9,6465 postsaylin criss aylincriss
@aylincrissonly · 18,2985 postsDorismar
@Dorismar · 13,5695 postsAndyRugerio Andy Rugerio
@AndyRugeriobot · 7,6364 postsimskirby
@imskirbybot · 12,9514 postsLilith Regia LilithRegia
@LilithRegia · 15,3584 postsClaarakush
@Claarakushof · 8,2443 postsKarolRosado
@KarolRosado · 9,5643 postsKeylaChicaiza Keyla Chicaiza
@KeylaChicaiza8 · 6,1643 postsladydusha lady dusha
@ladydusha5 · 7,6623 postsManuelaQuintero Manuela Quintero
@ManuelaQuinterobot · 8,4183 postsMelaniepavola Melanie pavola
@pavola · 17,2723 postsdelettraaoficial
@delettraaoficial · 11,3132 postsjanicenichole
@janicenichol · 5,8362 postsLakikis
@Lakikis · 5,4512 postslorenanerdygirl
@lorenanerdygirl9 · 5,6112 postsLunadiaz Luna diaz
@Lunadiaz · 7,9272 postsMaferShof mafer mafersho
@MaferShof_mafer · 5,9532 postsyazflexi
@yazflex · 5,4562 postsluzcelina
@luzcelinabot · 3,3081 postnetxuu
@netxuu · 10,9541 postrosslyn
@rosslyn · 4,0681 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Valentina94” (@Valentina948), 20,942 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Valentina948.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.