чисто в теории, кто-то будет слушать мой многострадальный бред, или все уже это исчадие ада в архив закинули? (ну мне лень рисовать, простите🤕)
🕊3

Channel
@Valer1exx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
113subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002456717997 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Valer1exx |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Valer1exx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:02 | 113 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 117 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 115 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 118 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 123 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 121 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
286 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5206271640094145392 | 47 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5262490030399581187 | 46 | 16.1% | |
| 🕊 | 43 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5229176060733588505 | 27 | 9.44% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5309789057826463748 | 25 | 8.74% | |
| custom 5206592809158608037 | 23 | 8.04% | |
| custom 5474301895994546214 | 20 | 6.99% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 4.20% | |
| custom 5325957934658644984 | 4 | 1.40% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.40% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| custom 5260544427394356939 | 2 | 0.699% | |
| custom 5197528826141245249 | 1 | 0.35% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.35% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.35% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.35% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Valer1exx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
чисто в теории, кто-то будет слушать мой многострадальный бред, или все уже это исчадие ада в архив закинули? (ну мне лень рисовать, простите🤕)
🕊3
me core(буду пропускать учёбу ради игрулек): спустя столько лет рисования я наконец понял, как же мне похуй на анатомию
custom 53097890578264637487🕊1
я больше не буду рисовать
🔥8custom 54743018959945462145🕊3custom 53097890578264637481
мне похуй, если из их фанатов только я, подруга и моя кошка
custom 530978905782646374812🕊6custom 52291760607335885053🆒1
фух, теперь можно и пропасть
custom 54743018959945462149custom 52291760607335885054custom 53097890578264637484🕊1
я ебал, спасибо за внимание
❤13custom 54743018959945462146custom 52291760607335885054🔥1🕊1custom 53097890578264637481
Posted without readable text
custom 520627164009414539214custom 52624900303995811877👎2❤1🕊1custom 52605444273943569391
ну ладно, получилось почти так, как я задумывал
❤5custom 52624900303995811875👻3🕊3
ну ладно, раз в год можно и геншин нарисовать
custom 520659280915860803710🔥3❤2👎2🕊1🖕1😨1
заберите у меня телефон, чтобы я не рисовал больше
custom 52624900303995811877❤4custom 52291760607335885054custom 52062716400941453923🕊1
а может мне пора перестать только скетчи и арты ебашить... да не, бред какой-то
custom 526249003039958118710🕊1
kill me plz ебучая мания перерисовывать старые арты, я её обожаю
custom 52062716400941453929🕊1custom 53259579346586449841
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Valer1exx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“наВЭЛьный” (@Valer1exx), 113 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Valer1exx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.