Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 32 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,936–13,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 14:41
13,946
+3
5 Sept 2026, 05:57
13,943
-7
3 Sept 2026, 07:48
13,950
-7
2 Sept 2026, 03:37
13,957
-3
1 Sept 2026, 00:16
13,960
-7
30 Aug 2026, 22:14
13,967
-3
29 Aug 2026, 19:45
13,970
-2
28 Aug 2026, 22:58
13,972
-6
28 Aug 2026, 00:54
13,978
+3
26 Aug 2026, 21:59
13,975
-9
25 Aug 2026, 19:26
13,984
+7
24 Aug 2026, 22:59
13,977
-3
23 Aug 2026, 11:15
13,980
+6
22 Aug 2026, 00:25
13,974
+10
20 Aug 2026, 17:04
13,964
+10
19 Aug 2026, 19:33
13,954
-2
18 Aug 2026, 18:09
13,956
-6
17 Aug 2026, 20:48
13,962
+3
16 Aug 2026, 17:53
13,959
+1
15 Aug 2026, 03:05
13,958
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 13,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
40 (22 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
38,380
Reactions total
604
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,664 reactions across 39 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,015
61.0%
👍
295
17.7%
❤
134
8.05%
🐳
67
4.03%
🤩
60
3.61%
custom 5314748207455037486
59
3.55%
custom 5348199165102959405
15
0.901%
custom 5350839260024974818
11
0.661%
custom 5350597019574513543
5
0.3%
custom 5314694297025538245
2
0.12%
custom 5314289895789849799
1
0.06%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 40 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VelesFinanceRu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🏆 Bybit собрал в одном состязании трейдеров с разных платформ и разыгрывает между ними 100 000 USDT
Присоединяйтесь к команде Veles!
Как принять участие?
1️⃣ Зарегистрируйтесь на Bybit или войдите в существующий аккаунт.
2️⃣ Создайте API-ключ на Bybit и подключите его к Veles.
3️⃣ На странице акции в блоке «Select your linked Broker» найдите Veles, выберите его и зарегистрируйтесь.
Только зарегистрированные пол…
Итоги августа с Veles
В августе на криптовалютный рынок вернулись объёмы, волатильность и ликвидность. Вместе с ними пришли и большие возможности для тех, кто торгует вместе с Veles.
Статистика Veles за август
⭐️ торговый объем - $328M
⭐️ суммарная прибыль пользователей - $1.18M
⭐️ в рекордный день вы заработали $175K 🔥
⭐️ вы закрыли 1.64M сделок и рассчитали 2.9M бэктестов
Лучшие стратегии месяца
1️⃣ 5 ботов для…
♟️ Бот на палладии заработал 58.41%, пока сам палладий дешевел. Отличный повод разобрать на нем обновленную статистику бэктестов
Раньше бэктест показывал прибыль и список сделок — выводы вы делали сами. Теперь в разделе «Статистика» появилось 3 новых блока метрик. Объясняем их на бэктесте XPD BOT.
1️⃣ Тег «Хороший результат» — вывод, который просчитан за вас
Зелёный тег в шапке ставится исходя из формулы: прибыль …
🔥 Veles Tech Digest: Выпуск #27 (01.08-28.08)
Завершаем лето специальным дайджестом обновлений за месяц и вспоминаем все важные обновления и релизы августа.
✅ Аналитика бэктестов стала нагляднее — умные теги сразу показывают, насколько стратегия хороша, результаты теста можно смотреть в форматах: NET и GROSS, метрики сгруппированы по смыслу, а данные по сделкам стали точнее
✅ Сверхточные бэктесты на тиках доступн…
За восемь дней биткоин прибавил около 38% от июньского дна. И приток денег в спотовые BTC-ETF продолжается.
Индекс страха и жадности держится в зоне жадности: покупателей на рынке сейчас заметно больше, чем продавцов. На таком движении сложнее всего решать — входить в лонг сейчас или ждать отката, и цена меняется быстрее, чем вы успеваете взвесить оба варианта.
У ручного трейдинга есть альтернатива: настроить страт…
📹📹📹 Поторгуем!
Как не поддаваться FOMO на текущем рынке и стабильно торговать в плюс?
Ответим на этот вопрос вместе с экспертом Veles и приглашенным трейдером Демьяном
В формате LIVE
⭐️ подберем сетапы для внутридневной и ситуативной торговли
⭐️ разберем правила подбора сетки под актив
⭐️ ответим на ваши вопросы
⌚️ Завтра в 17:00 на YouTube
Нефть подешевела на 5%. Бот на нефть заработал 40,72%
Последние пять месяцев цена нефти движется в диапозоне, максимальное движение — почти 37%. Однако итог за весь период: минус 5,42%. Что делать в таких ситуациях? Отрабатывать движения ботами.
Вы можете как собрать своего бота, так и запустить готового BRENTOIL LONG BOT.
Как он устроен?
⚫️вход открывается по трём условиям одновременно: тепловая карта ликвидаци…
Как не поддаться FOMO и при этом успеть за рынком?
Ответ: заранее настроить торговую стратегию, запустить ее и... закрыть Veles.
😎 Боты сами отработают все движения без человеческого фактора.
По случаю роста биткоина выбрали 4 варианта, которые очень хорошо показали себя с начала 2026 года. Представьте, какие PnL у них будут, когда рынок выйдет из медвежки.
*Не является ИИР
Как правильно построить стратегию?
Каждый год трейдеры заново пытаются предсказать направление. И каждый год оказывается, что деньги на дистанции приносит не прогноз, а структура: куда распределён капитал, в каком сезоне рынок и что из рутины можно отдать алгоритмам.
🍄 Поговорим об этом на стриме 20 августа в 17:00 с СТО и Co-Founder Veles Русланом Молчановым и нашим партнёром Андреем Ярдом.
На стриме разберём:
…
♟️ Золото дорожает, и крупные игроки продолжают его покупать
Центральные банки добавили 289 тонн золота в свои резервы только за II квартал 2026 года — это один из самых высоких показателей за последние годы. Среди крупнейших покупателей — Китай. Tether тем временем увеличил свои золотые запасы до более 146 тонн.
Золото сейчас держится на уровне около $4 400 за унцию.
Что всё это значит?
1️⃣ Центральные банки ди…
👍9🐳5🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @VelesFinanceRu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@VelesFinanceRu edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🐋 Биткоин — снова в районе 65 000$. Акции крупных компаний и нефть — растут, а многие альткоины сейчас очень волатильны. Мы начали собирать актуальных ботов и поняли — именно комьюнити должно решить, каким активами они будут торговать. Что думаете?
будем торговать BTC, SOL, ETH46%
торгуем акциями14%
хотим ботов на сырье19%
диверсифицируемся — торгуем металлами15%
ждем стратегии на альткоины41%
другое (напишу в комьюнити)2%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
INVESTCOIN @investcoin_free · 47,439 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич @wallet_with_bitcoins · 87,328 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Veles.Finance | Новости” (@VelesFinanceRu), 13,946 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VelesFinanceRu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.