📌 Salon vocal (libre antenne) sur ce canal Télégram le vendredi 7 août à 21h (heure de Paris) / 15h à Québec animé par Luc MSP. Minou Q de Great Awakening répondra en direct à toutes vos questions en direct. Lien du Salon 👉🏻 https://t.me/lesalondelucmsp?livestream

Channel
Reporter 83 🙏🏻🌎❤️
@VemHiuTyDy
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,874subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001441367946 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VemHiuTyDy |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VemHiuTyDy |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 2,874 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 2,883 | -8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 2,891 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 2,896 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 2,901 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 2,903 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 2,902 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 2,907 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 2,913 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:41 | 2,914 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 2,919 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 2,919 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 37s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 28.1% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 18.8% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Vendredi à 20h00 sur adnm.live Transformation et Révélations 2 sur 2 La technologie au centre des conversations... Et que fait cette statue de Ponce Pilate à la vignette ? Une émission qui se concentre sur la transformation, celle qu'on observe à l'extérieur, et aussi celle qui a lieu à l'intérieur de nous en ce moment même. Une double émission qu'on est obligés de couper en deux parties. Venez nombreux et partagez…
Bonjour,Je vous donne RDV à 19 avec Philippe Guillemant. Nous reviendrons sur son parcours, ses ouvrages et nous échangerons sur la science, le covid, la physique quantique ainsi que l'intelligence artificielle : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtchVOGykUk ce soir.Nicolas
👍2
Bonjour, Marion Sigaut m'a prévenu ce matin que, dans l'émission de mardi dernier sur "L'opération Gergovie", son début d'intervention a été tronquée et commence à la minute 6.35 au moment où elle lit la 3e page de ses notes. Voici donc la partie manquante (dûe à un bug probablement, car nous étions en direct et nous avons été parasités et ciblés avant même de commencer l'émission) : "En 1992, le Sénat réunit dans se…
❤1
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Pendant que tout le monde regarde un clash à la télé... Donald Trump démonte le système financier mondial en silence. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzJy3z7aQ-U
🤔2
Ma chère Christine, Il y a deux ans, jour pour jour, le 6 août 2024, en pleine période des JO 2024, je te recevais pour la dernière fois (sans le savoir) avec Guillaume des Soignants Militants pour parler d'une future pandémie en préparation, à savoir la variole du singe (qui arriva 10 jours après l'émission), en profitant de ce temps de parole pour faire quelques mises au point. L'émission : https://www.youtube.co…
❤1🙏1
Communiqué de @lallemandanne78 Reporter Citoyen Belge Membre de l'Alliance des Médias Citoyens Parfois, quand on est tous très engagés, les routes finissent par se séparer. Mais l'essentiel, c'est que les valeurs restent. En tant que membre de l'alliance des médias citoyens, j'ai décidé de mettre fin à notre collaboration avec Frédéric Boulangeot. C'est une décision mûrement réfléchie, prise en accord avec les princ…
👍1
Bonjour, A 19h, Grégoire Caustru, conférencier, et Bart de Wever, docteur en sciences physiques, nous présenteront une conférence sur les ondes électromagnétiques en parlant des conséquences sur notre santé ainsi que des moyens de s'en protéger : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1slfLhVS2g A ce soir. Nicolas
Voice message, posted without a caption
Communiqué de presse de Sheralight Shine Membre de l'alliance des médias citoyens Les chemins des femmes et des hommes engagés peuvent parfois se séparer. Les convictions, elles, demeurent En tant que membre de l'Alliance des Médias Citoyens, j'ai décidé de mettre un terme au partenariat avec Frédéric Boulangeot. Cette décision a été prise en conscience, au regard de mes principes également partagés par nos membres…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @VemHiuTyDy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@nicolasbouvier · 6,13210 postsLe salon de Luc MSP
@lesalondelucmsp · 2214 postsSylvia Miami Officiel
@sylviamiamiofficiel · 18,5663 postsL’Alliance des Médias Citoyens
@alliancedesmediascitoyens · 8242 postsA.D.N.M
@adnm_live · 42,1471 postVivre Sainement
@vivre_sainement_reel · 17,1171 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@VemHiuTyDy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reporter 83 🙏🏻🌎❤️” (@VemHiuTyDy), 2,874 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VemHiuTyDy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.