Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Real Madrid vs Valencia 📺

Channel

Real Madrid vs Valencia 📺

@VerFutbol6

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

28,236subscribers

-559 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002812423939
TypeChannel
Username@VerFutbol6
Description🏆 Canal para ver fútbol gratis ⚽️ Champions League y LaLiga en DAZN 🗣 Publicidad: @FutbolEnPrimera Este canal NO representa ninguna organización oficial. No copyright infringement intended ©️
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/VerFutbol6

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

28,04229,09528,568.522 August 2026 — 28,795 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,863 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,834 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,804 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,002 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,065 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,021 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,095 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,053 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,035 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,000 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,954 subscribers5 September 2026 — 28,977 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,916 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,844 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,781 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,709 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,672 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,635 subscribers25 September 2026 — 28,534 subscribers4 October 2026 — 28,368 subscribers8 October 2026 — 28,268 subscribers13 October 2026 — 28,181 subscribers14 October 2026 — 28,188 subscribers15 October 2026 — 28,178 subscribers16 October 2026 — 28,160 subscribers17 October 2026 — 28,133 subscribers18 October 2026 — 28,139 subscribers19 October 2026 — 28,128 subscribers20 October 2026 — 28,102 subscribers21 October 2026 — 28,124 subscribers22 October 2026 — 28,101 subscribers23 October 2026 — 28,088 subscribers24 October 2026 — 28,072 subscribers25 October 2026 — 28,042 subscribers26 October 2026 — 28,576 subscribers27 October 2026 — 28,514 subscribers28 October 2026 — 28,482 subscribers29 October 2026 — 28,448 subscribers30 October 2026 — 28,436 subscribers31 October 2026 — 28,403 subscribers1 November 2026 — 28,381 subscribers2 November 2026 — 28,333 subscribers3 November 2026 — 28,305 subscribers4 November 2026 — 28,287 subscribers5 November 2026 — 28,263 subscribers6 November 2026 — 28,236 subscribers28,23622 August 20266 November 2026
47 measurements spanning 76 days, net -559. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,884–29,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 10:5628,236-27
5 Nov 2026, 13:4428,263-24
4 Nov 2026, 15:3128,287-18
3 Nov 2026, 17:4628,305-28
2 Nov 2026, 15:4828,333-48
1 Nov 2026, 19:0028,381-22
31 Oct 2026, 17:4528,403-33
30 Oct 2026, 16:2928,436-12
29 Oct 2026, 17:0828,448-34
28 Oct 2026, 16:1528,482-32
27 Oct 2026, 16:2828,514-62
26 Oct 2026, 13:3628,576+534
25 Oct 2026, 15:0028,042-30
24 Oct 2026, 16:3528,072-16
23 Oct 2026, 17:1628,088-13
22 Oct 2026, 18:3128,101-23
21 Oct 2026, 16:1828,124+22
20 Oct 2026, 13:4528,102-26
19 Oct 2026, 10:1628,128-11
18 Oct 2026, 11:3928,139first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 28,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,890
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.049%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held56 (27 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total49,117
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
152
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 33 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9083.3%
👍65.56%
🔥65.56%
👾43.70%
🙉10.926%
🦄10.926%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (64.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC432 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Nos vemos en nada con la jornada de hoy de #UCL 🇪🇺

1 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Victoria cómoda del Real Madrid ante el Racing de Santander 🟥✅

❤1

31 Oct 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

El FC Barcelona vuelve a la senda de la victoria a lo grande ⚽️⚽️

25 Oct 2026, 22:20 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

SORPRESA EN EL CAMP NOU 🔥 El Real Madrid de Mourinho se impone por 1-2 al todopoderoso Barça de Hansi Flick. Un gol de Rapinha y dos de Mbappé cerraban el partido ⭐️🇪🇸

25 Oct 2026, 19:45 UTC≈5,810 views3 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

21:00 | 🔵🔴 Barça 🆚 Real Madrid ⚪ 👉 https://t.me/+rCTpMo-AasQxYjI0 🇪🇸 (DAZN) ✅ 👉 https://t.me/+gtQyvDZUiN5jMWU0 🇪🇸 (DAZN) ✅ 👉 https://t.me/VerFutbol7 (HD) ⚽ Ver toda LaLiga 26/27 GRATIS: https://t.me/VerFutbolGratisConFEP 🔴

❤3

25 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC≈7,140 viewsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Ganador de El Clásico de hoy ⭐️

  1. FC Barcelona ⚽️46%
  2. Real Madrid ⚽️55%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC≈5,340 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Preparen sus palomitas, nos vemos a las 21:00 🇪🇸

❤3

21 Oct 2026, 17:45 UTC≈4,340 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Buen partido de dominancia del Real Madrid ⚽️✅

❤1

20 Oct 2026, 16:11 UTC≈3,660 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

✅ El PSG está imparable y golea al Manchester City y FC Barcelona, equipos que están invictos en sus respectivas ligas 💀

👍2❤1

18 Oct 2026, 16:32 UTC≈2,980 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

El Real Madrid consigue una victoria firme ante el Sevilla sin Vinicius Jr 👀 Marcaron Arda Güler, Mbappé (2) y Diomandé ✅

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @VerFutbol6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@VerFutbol6 edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @VerFutbol6 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Poll174 voters

Ganador de El Clásico de hoy ⭐️

  1. FC Barcelona ⚽️46%
  2. Real Madrid ⚽️55%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Sept 2026, 18:21 UTCAnonymous Poll689 voters

Partidazo a las 21:30 🇪🇸

  1. Elche ⚽️18%
  2. Real Madrid ⚽️83%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Sept 2026, 11:29 UTCAnonymous Poll681 voters

Partidazo a las 16:15 ✅

  1. Gana Levante ⚽️17%
  2. Gana FC Barcelona ⚽️84%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Real Madrid vs Valencia 📺” (@VerFutbol6), 28,236 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VerFutbol6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.