https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqh71So79I0
β€9π3π1

Channel
@VibesOfCosmosAuthentic
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
3,293subscribers
+43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001503696707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VibesOfCosmosAuthentic |
| Created | 26 July 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VibesOfCosmosAuthentic |
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 3,293 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 3,294 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 3,297 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 3,294 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 3,292 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 3,294 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 3,291 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 3,286 | +19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 3,267 | +8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 3,259 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 3,256 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 3,252 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 3,251 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 3,250 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 3,250 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
259 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 128 | 49.4% | |
| β€ | 101 | 39.0% | |
| π | 18 | 6.95% | |
| π€ | 8 | 3.09% | |
| π― | 3 | 1.16% | |
| π₯ | 1 | 0.386% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 259 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqh71So79I0
β€9π3π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XFoO3dxr_I0
β€9π4π1
Inverted looks so familiar
β€14π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh4gM1gaevI
π10β€4π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n9ZNx73-TBA
π12β€4π1
We have studied the sun's paths for years now, and we think we have a better understanding of our realm. Also many new ideas about the craters and the actual structure has being re-evaluated. Things are getting very very strange. Take care and big HUGE thank you for your support! πGoeVibes to ALL!π β€οΈ
β€26π13π€6π1π₯1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l85RgvR9pd4
π12β€8π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π6π€2π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π8β€1π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eKzr2u2Vafg
π10β€2π1
For all us LUNAtics out there... enjoy the reality you knew all along, just VoC reminded you. GeoVibes to ALL! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uHFI0-54CGs
π9β€8π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtpzFoAzLfk
π12β€4π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @VibesOfCosmosAuthentic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βVIBES of COSMOSπβ (@VibesOfCosmosAuthentic), 3,293 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VibesOfCosmosAuthentic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.