Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ویدیو چک |‌ اخبار فوتبال ⚽️

Channel

ویدیو چک |‌ اخبار فوتبال ⚽️

@VideoCheckOrg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

44,551subscribers

-7,537 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624737462
TypeChannel
Username@VideoCheckOrg
Descriptionفوتبال یعنی زندگی🤍 ❌️ اینجا پشت پرده و حواشی فوتبال جهان رو براتون به نمایش میگذاریم ❌️ ‼️ طرفدار تیمی نیستیم ‼️
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VideoCheckOrg

Growth

44,55152,08848,319.515 August 2026 — 52,088 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,494 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,082 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,677 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,330 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,137 subscribers22 August 2026 — 49,855 subscribers24 August 2026 — 49,115 subscribers25 August 2026 — 48,764 subscribers26 August 2026 — 48,263 subscribers27 August 2026 — 47,994 subscribers28 August 2026 — 47,628 subscribers29 August 2026 — 47,269 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,976 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,474 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,065 subscribers2 September 2026 — 45,727 subscribers3 September 2026 — 45,326 subscribers6 September 2026 — 44,551 subscribers15 August 20266 September 2026
19 measurements spanning 21 days, net -7,537. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,420–53,219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 01:5544,551-775
3 Sept 2026, 19:0145,326-401
2 Sept 2026, 13:3345,727-338
1 Sept 2026, 10:3546,065-409
31 Aug 2026, 07:0446,474-502
30 Aug 2026, 03:3646,976-293
29 Aug 2026, 05:2747,269-359
28 Aug 2026, 08:5847,628-366
27 Aug 2026, 05:2947,994-269
26 Aug 2026, 08:0348,263-501
25 Aug 2026, 04:3348,764-351
24 Aug 2026, 00:1649,115-740
22 Aug 2026, 08:1649,855-282
20 Aug 2026, 23:3450,137-193
20 Aug 2026, 00:3550,330-347
18 Aug 2026, 21:2650,677-405
17 Aug 2026, 20:1351,082-412
16 Aug 2026, 21:3451,494-594
15 Aug 2026, 14:3152,088first reading

Engagement

855 posts held, back to 15 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.497%
avg views ÷ 44,551 subscribers
Avg views / post
221
847 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
855
of 855 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 637 of 847 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held855 (15 August 20268 September 2026)
Views total187,601
Reactions total5,591
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 23:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,550
Videos
1,100
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 03m
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 212 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,591 reactions across 634 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,98853.4%
92316.5%
🔥90316.2%
👍2474.42%
💔2284.08%
🤡1943.47%
👎1081.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 637 of the 855 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 855 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 21:06 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

🏆نتایج شب اول از هفته اول رقابت های لیگ قهرمانان اروپا 🏟 @VideoCheckOrg

🔥1

8 Sept 2026, 20:01 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

نیمه اول سکس تموم؛ رئال مادرید 2-0 اینتر 🏟 @VideoCheckOrg

🔥1

8 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC193 viewsread 8 September 2026
Photo

🚨⚽️⚽️ ترکیببب رئال مقابل اینتر 🏟 @VideoCheckOrg

8 Sept 2026, 18:15 UTC225 views7 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

مورینیو با وجود غیبت گولر، بازم حاضر نشد خرید 140 میلیون یورویی رو فیکس کنه و براهیم دیاز رو بهش ترجیح داد 🏟️ @VideoCheckOrg

🤣7

8 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC253 views6 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

⚽️ ترکیب رئال مادرید مقابل اینتر ساعت : 22:30 🏟️ @VideoCheckOrg

🔥4🤣2

8 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC255 views7 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

چمیونزلیگی که نکوست از بازی اولش پیداست 🏟️ @VideoCheckOrg

🔥7

8 Sept 2026, 16:36 UTC284 views11 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

🚨🔴⚽️| فوووووووووووری؛ زارع امروز اومده دوش بگیره پاش بریده و 8 تا بخیه زده😐😂، به همین علت 3 هفته از میادین دور خواهد بود 🏟️ @VideoCheckOrg

🤣6💔5

8 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC304 views9 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇺🅰️🇪🇸اگر وینیسیوس جونیور امشب پاس گل بدهد، با ثبت ۳۳ پاس گل، در کنار نیمار به عنوان چهارمین پاسور برتر تاریخ لیگ قهرمانان اروپا قرار خواهد گرفت. ⚪️در صورت ثبت دو یا چند پاس گل، او از رکورد نیمار عبور خواهد کرد. فرض کن این عقب مونده با نیمار یکی بشه 😬 🏟️ @VideoCheckOrg

🔥5🤣4

8 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC264 views9 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

وقتی اونقد پخت و پز کردی که میترسن بزارنت نامزد توپ طلا 🔥 🏟️ @VideoCheckOrg

🤣9

8 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 8 September 2026

🚨🏆 اینم از 10 نامزد پایانی توپ طلا : ⚽️ پاچو کیونونس ⚽️ دکلان رایس ⚽️ رودری ⚽️ فابین رویز ⚽️ ویتینیا ⚽️ اوپامکانو ⚽️ وینی ⚽️ سالیبا ⚽️ فران تورس 🏟️ @VideoCheckOrg

🤣8

Showing the 12 most recent of 855 posts we hold for @VideoCheckOrg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ویدیو چک |‌ اخبار فوتبال ⚽️” (@VideoCheckOrg), 44,551 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VideoCheckOrg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.