Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VlaDeFi

Channel

VlaDeFi

@VladDefi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,865subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002131528884
TypeChannel
Username@VladDefi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VladDefi

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8546,8696,861.57 August 2026 — 6,865 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,865 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,854 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,867 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,860 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,857 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,856 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,860 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,854 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,869 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,868 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,865 subscribers6,8657 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,852–6,871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 05:386,865-3
4 Sept 2026, 03:186,868-1
31 Aug 2026, 21:286,869+15
29 Aug 2026, 03:136,854-6
26 Aug 2026, 04:536,860+4
23 Aug 2026, 09:446,856-1
19 Aug 2026, 17:036,857-3
16 Aug 2026, 14:156,860-7
13 Aug 2026, 02:236,867+13
10 Aug 2026, 13:046,854-11
7 Aug 2026, 21:566,865no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:166,865first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 6,865 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held22 (16 April 202618 August 2026)
Views total1,950
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,262 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,62449.8%
👍1,08333.2%
45313.9%
😁611.87%
👏270.828%
50.153%
💯50.153%
❤‍🔥20.061%
🌭20.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,262 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 22 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VladDefi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 April 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,950 views67 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🚨 КТО ОПЛАЧИВАЛ БАНКЕТ В ВИДЕ 40 000%+ APR НА ROBINHOOD В ПУЛАХ ETH/USDG? Немного предистории и вводных данных: Начнем с самого чейна Robinhood - это EVM-совместимый L2 на базе Arbitrum для токенизированных акций, ETF и других реальных активов (RWA), само собой Uniswap во главе внимания, туда сразу полилась ликва и свопы Пару слов про USDG - это стейбл, который выпускает Paxos (многие думаю уже знакомы с ними чере

🔥41👍206

12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈3,310 views95 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🟣 КАК ПОЛУЧАТЬ ВКУСНЫЙ ПРОЦЕНТ НА СТЕЙБЛЫ ИЛИ ПОКУПАТЬ КРИПТУ ДЕШЕВЛЕ ЧЕРЕЗ JUPITER OFFERBOOK? Jupiter Offerbook - это площадка, где один человек даёт другому USDC в долг под залог крипты. Но в отличие от обычного лендинга, здесь ты сам выбираешь условия: какой актив готов принять в залог, сколько USDC выдать, на какой срок, под какой процент и с каким запасом по цене. Можно создать своё предложение или выбрать уже

👍7421

27 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC≈4,710 views169 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🟣 Про экосистему MONAD И ЧТО ТАМ СЕЙЧАС МОЖНО ПОФАРМИТЬ? Пока рынок выглядит так, будто ушёл в отпуск вместе со мной ☕️, предлагаю посмотреть на экосистему Monad. TVL сети уже перевалил за $700 млн, в стейблах внутри экосистемы находится примерно $562 млн, а TVL самой сети удвоился за 1 месяц. Один только рынок Aave на Monad уже собрал около $448 млн депозитов. То есть капитал туда реально заходит из-за доп наград.

🔥140👍1712

16 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC≈5,630 views78 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

✍️ Pendle превратил PT-looping в одну кнопку На самом деле ожидаемый релиз для привлечения ликвидности и интереса к площадке Раньше эта стратегия выглядела так: купить PT → заложить его в лендинг маркете → занять стейблкоин → купить ещё PT → снова внести его на сторону залога → взять еще раз займ и повторить несколько раз. Теперь Pendle автоматизировал весь процесс внутри V2. Пользователь выбирает PT, кредитный р

👍6310😁4🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈5,880 views364 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у меня юбилей - мне исполнилось 30 лет. К этому возрасту большинство целей, которые я когда-то ставил перед собой, закрыты. Безусловно, какие-то из них я корректировал по ходу жизни, на какие-то физически нужно больше времени, от каких-то отказывался, потому что они теряли актуальность, а на их месте появлялись новые - более масштабные и осознанные. В 20 лет я даже представить не мог, каким человеком стану к

187👍104🔥41👏22😁4💯32❤‍🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC≈5,000 views150 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Что сейчас делать в DeFi? И почему он стал таким скучным? Последнее время мне несколько раз писали в личку и в комменты в стиле: «Ради таких процентов, пфф, ну нафиг» «А что щас делать? Типо 6-7% на стейблы это норм?» Да и по другим каналам и ютубу виден в целом провал по активности. И я понимаю, почему оно так Просто рынок перешел в другую фазу вместе с DeFi, в менее шумную, менее очевидную, гораздо более требо

🔥80👍4822

27 Jun 2026, 11:22 UTC≈5,450 views356 reactions4 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Что бы я делал, имея капитал только в 1000$? Если кто-то из читателей находится в этой стадии - это нормально, тут ничего зазорного нет. Более того, вы уже успешнее значительной части населения РФ. По данным инФОМ 65% россиян вообще не имеют запаса на случай потери основного дохода. То есть живут от зарплаты до зарплаты, перебиваясь долгами. (приободрил как мог, надеюсь у меня тут все богатые и успешные, а если по

🔥302👍3614🌭2👏2

25 Jun 2026, 07:03 UTC≈5,090 views97 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

DeFi в текущем рынке: как я работаю с пулами ликвидности и лендингами, какие ошибки допускают новички? 🔥 Новое видео уже на канале 🔥 ✔️ Таблица из видео ✔️ В этом видео разбираю, как я сейчас смотрю на DeFi-портфель в текущем рынке: где использую лендинг-маркеты, как подхожу к пулам ликвидности V2/V3, почему держу стейбл-подушку и как стараюсь не брать неоправданный риск. Показываю логику распределения капитала по

🔥71👍26

19 Jun 2026, 15:08 UTC≈6,590 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Кого задел взлом протокола Drift - эта новость точно для вас 🚨 Drift Protocol запустил чекер для пострадавших пользователей Теперь вы можете зайти на 🔗 dfx.drift.trade, подключить кошелек и проверить, какая сумма компенсации начислена. Никаких активных действий прямо сейчас совершать не нужно! 🪙 Что такое токены DFX? Это долговая расписка (IOU) от проекта. 1 DFX = $1 ваших зафиксированных убытков по курсу на момен

👍2510🔥61

17 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC≈6,380 views121 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Почему я не верю в пассивный доход в DeFi в том виде, как его продают некоторые: мол, можно уехать чилить, пока капитал будет на тебя работать 24/7. Большинство людей верит в «положил и забыл». Маркетинг продает именно это, потому что так действительно проще продавать курсы и прочую историю. Я прекрасно понимаю: красивый APR в интерфейсе может срывать голову. Но на практике все немного иначе и тут ожидает нас ряд н

👍10119👏1

9 Jun 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,850 views83 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Circle запустила cirBTC - институциональный wrapped Bitcoin на Ethereum с обеспечением 1:1 нативным BTC. Это не просто ещё один обёрнутый биткоин. Это попытка перенести модель USDC на BTC: регулируемый эмитент, прозрачные резервы, on-chain верификация через Chainlink и встроенная интеграция в Circle Mint. 🔍 Как это работает Механика стандартная для wrapped-активов: • Институциональный клиент депонирует нативный B

👍5417🔥10👏2

9 Jun 2026, 06:31 UTC≈4,760 views141 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🤑 Куда сейчас пристроить стейблкоины? Разбираю 5 вариантов в своем новом видео + делюсь мыслями по рынку и что я сейчас делаю 🍿 Смотреть видео 🍿 ✔️ Таблица из видео ☕️ Решил возобновить старую рубрику, так как увидел активность в комментах на ютубе, я если что каждый читаю 😁 Кидайте 🔥, если было полезно, буду иногда выпускать подобные подборочки ------------------------------- YouTube | VlaDeFi | Комьюнити

🔥121👍20

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @VladDefi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CryptoInside
@crypt0inside · 28,710
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Коненков Святослав | White Way
@konenkov_official · 71,464
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Объявления Baby Doge
@BabyDogeAnnRU · 83,633
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
CryptoJobs - работа в криптовалюте
@workers_tg · 32,808
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 10 September 2026
Андрей Меркулов | Покупаю → Ремонтирую → Сдаю
@andrewmerkulov · 26,493
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VlaDeFi” (@VladDefi), 6,865 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VladDefi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.