خوان رجا دعمين تصويت خلي شوف فزعتكم

Channel
Vn Editor filters
@VnEditorFilters
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,735subscribers
-122 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001693851756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VnEditorFilters |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VnEditorFilters |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 11,735 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 11,744 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:07 | 11,754 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 11,756 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 11,764 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 11,775 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 11,774 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 11,779 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 11,781 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 11,788 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 11,796 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 11,803 | -19 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 11,822 | -16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 11,838 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 11,845 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 11,849 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 11,855 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 11,858 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 11,857 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 69.5% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 22.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
❤9😁2
تصويت ع رقم ٨ لي يصوت يدخل بأخذ فلتر @oo777o
❤6
بالعافيه
❤1
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBpDC1IyPtKw01ZSb0q/103 تصويت فقط للحاج حسين البزوني
لي يصوت يدخل خاص يأخذ لفلتر شباب فلتر يناسب كافه الصور مجانا مجانا @Haa31q
❤2
صوت ودخل خاص @oo777o
❤3
File, posted without a caption
❤6🔥4
Bangset Cinematic Pack 31 Video LUTs
❤9👍9
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
https://t.me/VnEditorFilters
❤5👍3
بريست من اقوى الفلاتر قناتي جديده شاركه مع الأصدقاء 😳😂😂😘❤️😍😁😭😒😜😭😱😃😀😢😏😉😐👷♀👨🚀🧑⚖🧜🧚🐦🔥🌹💐😍👍👍👍😘😒💯⚠️ https://t.me/filter24hours
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @VnEditorFilters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@VnEditorFilters named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tamizhantechofficial · 66,887
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 20 August 2026
@besttutorialsreels · 35,124
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 2 September 2026
@Kabaedits · 71,600
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 20 August 2026
@createwithsid · 80,854
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 18 August 2026
@techlokeshyt · 88,539
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
@capcut · 167,904
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 August 2026
@CapCutTemplatesCom · 75,724
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 August 2026
@capcuttemplatesfree · 162,188
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 16 August 2026
@lightroom_prest · 56,566
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vn Editor filters” (@VnEditorFilters), 11,735 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VnEditorFilters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.