Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Володя Неординарный

Channel

Володя Неординарный

@Volodya_Neordinarny

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

81subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698613235
TypeChannel
Username@Volodya_Neordinarny
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Volodya_Neordinarny

Growth

818281.59 August 2026 — 81 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81 subscribers17 August 2026 — 82 subscribers18 September 2026 — 81 subscribers9 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:1781-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:0682+1
9 Aug 2026, 18:4781no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:4681first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 46s
Average length
20m 46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2630.6%
❤‍🔥1618.8%
🔥1315.3%
👍89.41%
😢55.88%
🍾33.53%
🎉33.53%
👌33.53%
🤩33.53%
💔22.35%
👏11.18%
😱11.18%
🤝11.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC44 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Эта штука спасла мой день 😁😋🥰 Можно поесть со спагетти, а можно завернуть в бурито 😁

❤‍🔥61🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC43 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вывод! Ролтон в любом случае на мой взгляд здесь сильно обкакались… Тем более в попытке подражать Buldak, чтобы попасть в последний вагон тренда. И к тому же мне пипец как не нравится горькое послевкусие

3❤‍🔥1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC39 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Окей, эта штука, именно вкус карбонары, уже получше по вкусу. Лапша правда всё ещё не очень вкусная, однако есть более менее можно Тем не менее это такое себе. Его я бы ещё мог с натяжкой порекомендовать, но лучше всё-таки купить либо Доширак, либо BigBon или ещё какую лапшу, которая на вкус понежнее и не слишком острая, хотя здесь я соус добавил совсем чутьчуть, но всё равно припекает. P. S. : справедливости ради

2💔1🔥1🤝1

3 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC42 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

РЕБЯТААА! Не знаю, кто ещё пробовал, но ЭТО шляпа полная! Такая же острая, как Бульдак, хотя соуса добавил немного, не всю пачку, а где-то одну четверть, но вкуса нету никакого, просто будто бы что-то отвратное 🤮 Фу! Ни в коем случае не рекомендую к покупке! Попробовал только то, что в жёлтой упаковке, НО это совершенно невкусно. Боюсь даже розовый пробовать. Если кто пробовал, как оно вам? Есть ли те, с кем мнени

1💔1😢1😱1

1 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я тутачки поучаствовал 😁

❤‍🔥1👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC31 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @projectevolutiondubPhoto

Первая серия нашего дубляжа ВЫШЛА!!! Мы надеемся, что не разочаруем вас, и если вам понравилось - подпишитесь, пожалуйста, на группу, чтобы следить за новостями. На случай если заблокируют: disk.yandex.ru/i/4nC7JB42... t.me/projectevo... Режиссер дубляжа: Софья Мосалева Работа со звуком: Вячеслав Никитин Перевод: Стелла Кукер Идея проекта: Евгений Семёнов Роли озвучивали: Циклоп - Максим Пупынин Джин Грей - Елена Еф

5❤‍🔥1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC71 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Не каждый день увидишь модный показ. Тем более в метро!

2❤‍🔥1🤩1

26 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3❤‍🔥2🤩1

24 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC65 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Арбузный сезон объявляю открытым 😁

👍6🍾3🎉3🔥21🤩1

18 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC79 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @AniBazaTGPhoto

Люпен III: Бессмертная родословная / Lupin the IIIrd the Movie: Fujimi no Ketsuzoku [2025] Озвучили: Droed, Skyfinger, Володя Неординарный, Пsих, Megera, LucyNyuElf Работа со звуком: ReNNokiTo Роспись ролей: Zhapar Перевод: Roger-Z » СМОТРЕТЬ ОНЛАЙН [01/01]« #Люпен_III_Бессмертная_родословная #фильм #Lupin_the_IIIrd_the_Movie_Fujimi_no_Ketsuzoku #лето_2025 #сёнен #экшен #приключения #аниме #anime #озвучка #AniBaza

2

16 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Извиняюсь за щитпост, но для меня это было очень важно сказать

👌3

16 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC77 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я сейчас понимаю очень важную для себя мысль. Если кто-то говорит о людях такие мерзкие гадости, накрутив себе в голове, какой ты на самом деле, то это скорее говорит о самом человеке, который рассказывает про тебя такие вещи. И даже если кто-то из вас где-то ошибся и сделал что-то не то в чате блогера даже самое мелкое, что вполне можно было бы проигнорировать просто, чтобы не провоцировать конфликт, а лучше разобр

😢4❤‍🔥2🔥2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Volodya_Neordinarny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Володя Неординарный” (@Volodya_Neordinarny), 81 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Volodya_Neordinarny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.