Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 全球数据(新世界🌊)12pm-2am

Channel

全球数据(新世界🌊)12pm-2am

@WSfenshang

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24,500subscribers

+7,807 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001976722440
TypeChannel
Username@WSfenshang
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/WSfenshang

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,35026,08419,2177 August 2026 — 16,693 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,693 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,617 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,537 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,254 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,986 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,829 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,669 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,539 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,199 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,968 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,860 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,800 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,716 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,702 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,511 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,319 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,266 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,215 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,193 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,093 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,837 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,754 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,590 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,363 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,163 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,861 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,350 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,913 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,084 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,140 subscribers15 September 2026 — 24,500 subscribers24,5007 August 202615 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 39 days, net +7,807. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,290–28,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 04:3924,500-640
13 Sept 2026, 10:1725,140-944
11 Sept 2026, 11:5726,084+11,171
8 Sept 2026, 22:1714,913+2,563
5 Sept 2026, 17:2012,350-511
3 Sept 2026, 15:4012,861-302
2 Sept 2026, 10:1713,163-200
1 Sept 2026, 13:4413,363-227
31 Aug 2026, 11:4713,590-164
30 Aug 2026, 15:1513,754-83
29 Aug 2026, 11:4513,837-256
28 Aug 2026, 11:5614,093-100
27 Aug 2026, 11:1414,193-22
26 Aug 2026, 09:2314,215-51
25 Aug 2026, 08:2214,266-53
24 Aug 2026, 10:2414,319-192
22 Aug 2026, 20:3614,511-191
21 Aug 2026, 13:2414,702-14
20 Aug 2026, 13:4514,716-84
19 Aug 2026, 10:2214,800first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.65%
avg views ÷ 24,500 subscribers
Avg views / post
650
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held25 (25 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total3,249
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

793 reactions across 24 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23429.5%
13817.4%
🔥9812.4%
👏455.67%
👌263.28%
💯263.28%
😱202.52%
😍182.27%
🥰172.14%
🎉162.02%
😢151.89%
🏆141.77%
😭131.64%
😁121.51%
🤣121.51%
❤‍🔥91.13%
🫡81.01%
70.883%
🎃70.883%
💋70.883%
19 further kinds516.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC89 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

插播一条对各行各业都很有用的广告! 请看完! 💲专业国际猎头,寻求各国公司长期合作💴 🔤🔤HR人事经理滴滴我 主要业务覆盖: 1️⃣各国男女岗位:各种ai模特真人模特,键盘手,话务员,翻译,以及小众特殊岗位。 2️⃣各类语言:包括英语,法语,俄语,西班牙语,意大利语,德语,日语,韩语等 3️⃣各种国籍:俄罗斯人,乌克兰人,哈萨克斯坦人,孟加拉人,巴基斯坦人,尼泊尔人,菲律宾人,印尼人,巴西人,墨西哥人,德国人,韩国人,日本人,突尼斯人、摩洛哥人、埃塞俄比亚人以及各种非洲人等等 做海外盘口的盘总,需要外籍模特,翻译,话务的联系! 小路整个东南亚都能安排! 仔细看完! ⚠️各位尊贵的合作伙伴: 1️⃣我们这边的模特在到公司一个月之内会免费更换【路费需要由公司承担】,但前提是她不胜任当前她在贵公司的工作。 2️⃣如果因为某些老板或者管理因为操不到人家,就找借口换人,我们是不包换的哦,想要新模特就要重新计算。 3️⃣或者某位模特已

3👍3💯2🏆1

30 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC429 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

有些同行真的🐶,抹黑别人,误导别人,为了挣钱什么手段也有…伤人…. 我真不想曝光这些逼崽子。什么话都能乱说。 有本事就好好干。抹黑干嘛呢? @btc2q

👍7🔥4🤯2😁2🙏2💋1💯1

30 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC231 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

我做那么久时间的海外数据了,既然有老板怀疑我出售的数据是水军…. 快给我打一针镇定剂吧… 我真不是水军… @btc7q 👹

👍8😁4😍4😭3🤣1🙉1

29 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,140 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026

其实我好久没分享关于我在数据行业的心得,虽然都是夕阳行业了,但是我还坚守在岗位。说全心全意对待,那是不太现实,我也要生活,我也有新的项目去发展,做了那么多年海外数据,你让我放下这一切,难免会舍不得,我在最困难的时候,接触了飞机,筛选了对我来说简单又挣钱的海外数据行业,它让我重生,把超过百万的债务还清了,差点破碎的家也有了希望,买了房买了车买了自己喜欢的。 我非常感激我现在有的一切。 我没坑人 反而被人坑的多。也有一部分老朋友是因为别人坑我,同时被害了。 如果还恨我 我也没话说。反正我真心在数据行业没坑过任何人。 其实现在有很多人找数据找资源都在各种野鸡出海群里找,但他们不知道像我们这种诚信老品牌已经不打广告了,所以很难找到我们。 我也联系了以前的老同行,了解行情,嘘寒问暖。他们原本都做得很好,22年-24年,他们的收入相当可观,可现在他们实话告诉我,他们都在骗人了。因为回不去可观的收入时期。 也有很多小小数据商,利用各种小库

👍97🔥6👌4👨‍💻1😍1

18 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,360 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

反正别被骗了,停一停等一等就少损失。 冒充狗一直都有。 @btc2q 看准用户名,联系我

👍105😱5😁42👎1🤣1

16 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈1,300 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

唉,到底要抓到什么时候啊,各个大佬都难了。

😭10😢7🌚5👀3👍3💔2

16 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

忙的时候忙的一批,闲的时候闲的蛋疼。 你们是不是也这样?私聊我聊聊天吧。蛋疼中。多沟通往往有好的收获! @btc2q

👍11😍5💋4🫡4🤣1

16 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈1,190 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

统一计算汇率6.8了哈,提醒一下各位老板。 海外数据请联系我,么么哒❤️ @btc2q

👌147👍5👏3💯2🏆1

13 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,020 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026

妈的 谁盗我小号… 操了 我也没点文件啊

😱11😢8🕊4🤯4🤣3👻1

7 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,610 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026

大家都喊行情差,没客户,没老板,其实更多的是没有稳定的地方工作。 新项目嫌成本高,老项目嫌时间长。那你别做,回村养老。 海外数据持续输出。 肉鸡远控再等等,技术也在搬家中。 @tianjiao8881 @btc2q 👉

👍136❤‍🔥5👏4🍌2🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,480 views35 reactionsread 30 August 2026

7月份出的好的国家数据排名有以下🥰 Telegram 1.美国tg📱 2.德国tg📱 3.比利时tg📱 4.台湾tg📱 5.香港tg📱 6.巴西tg📱 7.加拿大tg📱 8.巴基斯坦tg📱 9.印度tg📱 10.乌克兰tg📱 Ws 1.美国Ws📱 2.加拿大Ws📱 3.瑞士Ws📱 4.新加坡Ws📱 5.马来Ws📱 6.巴西Ws📱 7.智利Ws📱 8.印尼Ws📱 Zalo 1.越南Zalo✅ VB 1.菲律宾VB📱 华侨 1.马来华侨👍📟 2.美国华侨👍📟 3.德国华侨👍📟 4.法国华侨👍📟 5.西班牙华侨👍📟 6.日本华侨👍💩 需要其他的数据随时给我发信息 下单喊我: @tanjiao8881 👉

14👍9👏7👌2🤩2😘1

27 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈1,190 views31 reactionsread 30 August 2026

6-7月份出的总结我这里出的最多的数据,效果明显好的。 全球各国TG数据🟢 联系: @btc2q 👉

👍12🔥75🥰3👏2👨‍💻1🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @WSfenshang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全球数据(新世界🌊)12pm-2am” (@WSfenshang), 24,500 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WSfenshang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.