Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ольга Савенкова 🫶

Channel

Ольга Савенкова 🫶

@WayToOlimp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

648subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001218745717
TypeChannel
Username@WayToOlimp
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/WayToOlimp

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6486686586 August 2026 — 668 subscribers6 August 2026 — 668 subscribers15 August 2026 — 665 subscribers22 August 2026 — 664 subscribers28 August 2026 — 658 subscribers5 September 2026 — 648 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 645–671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 17:57648-10
28 Aug 2026, 21:36658-6
22 Aug 2026, 10:35664-1
15 Aug 2026, 01:04665-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:45668no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:34668first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2347.9%
🔥1225.0%
❤‍🔥612.5%
👍612.5%
💯12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WayToOlimp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC49 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Поймала себя на мысли: международные проекты и консультации по выходу на глобальный рынок стали для меня полной нормой. Я даже удивляться перестала! А ведь если остановиться на секунду и посмотреть со стороны... Вау. Когда-то это казалось чем-то из разряда далеких целей, а сегодня — мой обычный рабочий день. 🤩✨

🔥5👍2

26 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC87 views5 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

В пятницу были съемки для ютуб-канала Обожаю эти дни Мы еще стараемся совмещать это с фотосетом и сегодня фотограф прислала результат. Единственное, о чем жалею - что не сделала с этим фотографом хотя бы пару своих фото 🤪 Ну любуйтесь тогда селфи 😁 Обожаю съемки: свои, клиентов. Они позволяют нам создавать свой красивый мир 😍 Скоро похвастаюсь новыми обложками для новых выпусков ❤️

5

25 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC66 viewsread 6 August 2026

Всем привет!!! Мы начинаем!!!! 😍😍😍 Жду вас ☺️

24 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC67 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC63 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

24 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Бизнес делают не только воронки и маркетинг. Бизнес делают ЛЮДИ. ❤️ В последние годы коллеги подсвечивают мне одну важную вещь, о которой я сама даже не задумывалась. Моя главная суперсила — это умение выстраивать глубокие, доверительные отношения. И в партнерстве, и в семье. Когда у тебя дома есть эта опора и безопасность, ты и в бизнес выходишь совершенно из другого состояния — из силы, без суеты и с крутым масшт

❤‍🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вчера я должна была выложить этот пост. Но не выложила - и в этом есть символизм. 🕰️ Вся наша индустрия сейчас работает на пределе из-за хаоса и устаревших моделей. Давайте честно: рынок инфобизнеса изменился, а методы у многих остались из 2021 года. Что происходит прямо сейчас: 1️⃣ На стороне продюсеров: Модель «запустим сторис - нальем трафик - сделаем вебинар» больше не дает стабильности. Продюсеры устали от р

1

21 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC65 viewsread 6 August 2026

В чате ММ поделись тем, почему пропала из активного ведения соц сетей почти на год ❤️ https://t.me/+815Wm-PNWHgzYWNi

15 Jul 2026, 23:12 UTC94 viewsread 6 August 2026

Кто вами управляет: вы алгоритмами или они вами? Коллеги, давайте начистоту: кто реальный босс в вашем бизнесе — вы или алгоритмы соцсетей? Правила игры, которые нам навязали площадки, сегодня выглядят как абсурд: Не выложил вовремя сторис ➔ получай штраф в виде падения охватов. Использовал не тот тренд или стоп-слово ➔ улетел в теневой бан. Не успел за новым алгоритмом ➔ твой глубокий экспертный пост никто не увиди

13 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ловушка «красивого блога»: когда процесс полностью заменил результат Коллеги, продолжим тему контентного рабства и парадокса масштаба. Сегодня поговорим о скрытом кризисе, который на рынке принято считать успехом. Смотришь на профиль эксперта — картинка идеальная: эстетичная лента, регулярные публикации, трендовые шрифты, рилсы каждый день и лайки от коллег по цеху. Со стороны кажется: «Ну вот же, маркетинг работае

💯1

9 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC90 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Парадокс 35-40 лет: почему сильные эксперты сжимаются в контенте? 🧩📉 Коллеги, наблюдаю забавно-грустный парадокс на рынке среди взрослых, состоявшихся экспертов в возрасте 35-40+ лет. За плечами - годы практики, реальные твердые кейсы, международный опыт и тонны прочитанных книг. Но как только дело доходит до блога, они внезапно сжимаются до уровня джуниоров и выдают банальщину в стиле: «Вот 3 совета, как делегиров

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WayToOlimp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ольга Савенкова 🫶” (@WayToOlimp), 648 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WayToOlimp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.